Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction (한국건축시공학회지)

The Korean Institute of Building Construction (한국건축시공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Decision Making Model for a Public Construction Project Delivery Method Selection based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

AHP를 이용한 공공공사 입찰 방식 의사결정지원 모델

  • Lee, Ung-Kyun (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Catholic Kwandong University)
  • Received : 2017.08.16
  • Accepted : 2017.10.12
  • Published : 2017.12.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The bidding method of public works is decided based on the experience of the officials in charge and the convenience of the work, but the validity of decision making process for the bidding method has not been verified. Another challenge in the bidding method selection is its objective validation is not easy because the decision making is based on experience, when a new type of project is ordered or a new bidding method is applied In this study, therefore, a decision making model to facilitate the selection of a public construction project delivery method was developed and examined with its applicability. This model was developed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and was verified through 32 persons who were actually in charge of the works. As a result of applying this model, 5 of the 32 persons showed consistency in using the model. and they expressed positive opinions about the model. The model can provide a guide while recognizing the fact that they cannot depend entirely on the model. Therefore, the model proposed in this study is expected to reduce the work-related burden of the persons who are involved in the related work and help the objective performance of their tasks when a new bidding method or project appears in the future.

공공공사의 입찰 방식 결정은 공무수행담당자의 경험 및 업무의 편의성 등을 고려하여 결정되고 있는데, 입찰을 위한 방식 결정 과정의 타당성 검증은 이루어지지 못하고 있는 실정이다. 입찰방식의 선정에 있어 또다른 도전과제는 경험위주의 의사결정을 근간으로 하고 있어 새로운 형태의 프로젝트 발주 또는 새로운 형태의 입찰방식 적용 시 그것에 대한 객관적 타당성을 마련할 방법이 쉽지 않다는 점이 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 공공공사 프로젝트 발주 방식 선정에 도움을 줄 수 있는 의사결정모델을 개발하고 이의 활용성을 검토하고자 한다. 본 연구는 계층분석적의사결정기법을 이용하여 모델을 개발하였고 실제 업무 수행 담당자 32명을 통해 검증하였다. 모델 활용결과 32명 중 5명의 모델활용에 일관성이 있었으며, 담당자들은 모델에 전적으로 의존할 수 없다는 사실을 인지하면서도 가이드를 제시해줄 수 있다는 점에서 긍정적 의견을 제시하였다. 이를 통해 본 연구에서 제시한 모델이 향후 새로운 형태의 입찰방식 또는 과제 발생 시 관련 업무 수행자의 업무관련 부담을 줄여주고 객관적인 공무수행에 도움을 줄 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi EA, Kim H, Park SY, Cho HJ, Lee SB. The improvement plan of project delivery systems in the public construction projects. Proceeding of Korean Institute Construction Engineering and Management; 2008 Nov 7-8; Seoul, Korea. Seoul (Korea): Korean Institute Construction Engineering and Management; 2008. p. 509-12.
  2. Yu IH & Kim KR. Project delivery systems and project performance : an evaluation model for public construction projects. Proceeding of Korean Institute Construction Engineering and Management; 2007 Nov 9-10; Busan, Korea. Seoul (Korea): Korean Institute Construction Engineering and Management; 2007. p. 41-7.
  3. Choi EA, Kim BO, Lee SB. A Study on the Selection Criteria for Delivery System of Public Construction Projects in Local Governments. Journal of The Korean Institute of Building Construction. 2009 Oct;9(5):113-9. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2009.9.6.113
  4. Moon HS, Hong TH, Koo GJ, Hyun CT. The Analysis on the Impact Factors of Delivery Method for Multi-Family Housing Projects. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2008 Jun;9(3):75-84.
  5. Kim SK, Park HK, Son KY, Park CS. A Selection Model For Power Plant Project Delivery Method. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2007 Feb;8(1):66-77.
  6. Kim KI, Seo YC, Hyun CT. A Study on the Selection Criteria for Delivery Systems in the large Public Building Projects. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (Structure & Construction Section). 2000 Apr;16(4):79-86.
  7. Kim DG, Lee UK, Lee HJ. Research into the Decision-making Factors for the Selection of Contract Methods in Public Construction. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2015 Aug;15(4):405-12. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2015.15.4.405
  8. Cho KT, Cho YG, Kang HS. The analytical hierarchy process for leaders. Donghyeonchoolpansa, Seoul; 2003.
  9. Moon KJ, Lee SH. An analysis of priority assessment to execute policy which use AHP : Focusing on tourism industrial policy in Jeju Special Self-Governing Province. Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association. 2015 Mar;27(1):207-24.
  10. Hong JH, Yeom DJ, Choi SJ, Kim YS. A study on the decision support model to select an appropriate alternative plan in apartment remodeling, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (Structure & Construction Section). 2017 Mar;33(3):41-50.
  11. Son SH, You SM, Lee KS, Choi YK. A Study on Reconstruction and Remodeling's Selection Factors of Old Apartment Houses Using AHP. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2015 Nov;16(6):12-21. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2015.16.6.012
  12. Yeo SK, Lee HC, Go SS. A Study on the Bidder Evaluation System Using the Technology Proposal-Based Best Value System. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2010 Mar;11(2):124-36. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2010.11.2.124