치의학 역사 수업의 질적 연구 논문과 수필에 관한 연구

The Study on the qualitative research paper and essay done in dental history class.

  • 투고 : 2016.07.28
  • 심사 : 2016.10.01
  • 발행 : 2016.12.01

초록

For three years, from 2014 to 2016, in dental history class, 263 3rd grade students, attending postgraduate dental school had reviewed current problems of the dentistry and dental care system by adopting historical thinking, in forms of essays, editorials, and papers, The purpose of this study is to know whether writing has educational benefits on students. Analysis of the writings and Student course evaluation showed that it is beneficial. All of the students agreed on submitting a qualitative study project instead of taking midterms on 2016. The approval ratio has increased over the years, on 2014 being 82%, on 2015 being 98%, on 2016 being 100%. For that reason, it is not an assertion to deduce that the students have experienced benefits while developing their genuine thoughts on the current status or problems, exploring what their role is, and what they will face. The chronological thinking had been used throughout the researches to identify what Dentistry and Dentist is. Dentistry have encompassed knowledges of natural sciences, humanities and other fields when needed to perfect itself. In doing so, Dentist achieved independence from doctor or other cooperatives. Research on Korean Dental care system has involved in historical thinking, including historical analysis, inquisition, and historical imagination, insight. etc. If the in-depth evaluation consisting of history and writing is sustained, it would be very effective teaching method.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 임도빈. 질적 연구 방법의 내용과 적용전략: 양적인 질적 연구와 질적인 질적 연구. 정부학연구 2009;15(1):155-187
  2. UCLA. National Center for History in the School, National Standards for United States History. 1996. www.nchs.ucla.edu
  3. 강인애. 왜 구성주의인가? 정보화시대와 학습자중심의 교육환경. 문음사. 61-81. 1997.
  4. 양호환, 역사교육의 입론과 구상, 책과 함께, 2012, 281
  5. Boelen E. Medical education reform, the need for global actio, Academic Medicied, 1992; 67(11):745-9 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199211000-00007
  6. 국회사무처. 제11회 국회임시회의속기록 26. 1951년 7월 14일
  7. 의사신문. 관료통제심해 기본인권 박탈, 국민의료법은 시급히 시정되야 한다. 1961년 4월 10일
  8. 박형욱. 한국 의료법체계의 성격과 역사적 변천, 연세대학교 대학원 보건학과 석사논문 2001.
  9. 밀턴 뢰머 지음. 강민선 외 5인 옮김, 세계의 보건 의료제도. 한울. 2002.
  10. Korea Policy Centre, OECD 보건정책 연구 보건지출에서 비용대비 가치:OECD Health Policy Studies:Vallue for Money in Health Spending , 2012.
  11. Wolcott, H. Transforming Qualitative Data: Description, Analysis, and Interpretation. London:Sage, 1994: 조용환, 질적 연구 ? 방법과 사례. 교육과학사. 41-50 재인용. 1999.
  12. 마리루 해리건 지음. 이상일 외 옮김. 의료의 질 관리-문헌 고찰을 통한 90년대의 쟁점과 과제-1992. 캐나다 의학협회. 울산대학교 출판부. 1998.