International Commerce and Information Review (통상정보연구)

Korea Association for International Commerce and Information (한국통상정보학회)
권호 표지

The Effect of Strategic and Operational Integration of 1st supplier's buyer and supplier on Production Flexibility

1차 협력사의 구매자 및 공급자와의 전략적·운영적 통합이 생산의 유연성에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Jong Hoon (College of Business Administration, Sogang University) ;
  • Lee, Tae Hee (Major of International Trade & Commerce, Keimyung University)
  • 김종훈 (서강대학교 경영학부) ;
  • 이태희 (계명대학교 경제통상학부)
  • Received : 2016.09.29
  • Accepted : 2016.12.10
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study empirically verified impact of strategic and operational integration between first-tier supplier and their supplier and strategic and operational integration between first-tier supplier and their buyer on operation performance. In order to achieve our goal, we tested reliability, validity and path coefficient using structural equation modeling-partial least square (SEM-PLS) over 284 first-tier manufacturing suppliers data that Korea Productivity Center (KPC) surveyed in 2013. This study results indicated that operational integration between first-tier supplier and their supplier or buyer has positive impact on production process flexibility. Meanwhile, strategic integration between first-tier supplier and buyer has positive impact on production flexibility. On the other hand, strategic integration between first-tier supplier and supplier has negative impact on production flexibility. And production process flexibility has positive impact on production flexibility. By empirically testing to departmentalize level and scope of supply chain integration, this study has academic and managerial implications from first-tier perspective on.

본 연구는 복잡한 공급사슬에서 1차 협력사의 공급사슬통합에 초점을 두고 있다. 즉, 1차 협력사와 공급기업(2차 협력사)과의 전략적 운영적 통합 그리고 1차 협력사와 구매기업(완제품업체)의 전략적 운영적 통합이 1차 협력사의 운영성과(유연성)에 미치는 영향을 실증적으로 규명하고 있다. 이를 위해, 1차 협력사에 해당하는 284개 기업을 대상으로 구조방정식(PLS)을 이용하여 신뢰성, 타당성 및 경로를 검정하였다. 분석결과 1차 협력사와 이해당사자들(완제품업체와 2차 협력사)의 운영적 통합은 생산 프로세스 유연성에 긍정적 영향을 미쳤다. 한편, 1차 협력사와 완제품업체와의 전략적 통합은 생산 유연성에 정의 영향을 미쳤지만, 1차 협력사와 2차 협력사와의 전략적 통합은 생산 유연성에 부정적 영향을 미쳤다. 마지막으로 1차 협력사의 생산 프로세스 유연성은 자사의 생산 유연성에 긍정적 영향을 미쳤다. 본 연구의 시사점은 공급사슬통합의 수준과 범위 그리고 기업 성과에 직 간접적인 영향을 세분화하여 규명하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cooper, M. D., Lambert, D. M., Pagh, J. D., 문희철 (1999), "공급사슬관리를 활용한 한국기업의 물류혁신방안", 통상정보연구, 1(1), 11-32.
  2. 권현복, 박종우, 조동혁 (2015), "공급사슬 통합, 역량 및 성과간의 관계: 목재산업을 중심으로", 로지스틱스 연구, 23(2), 111-129.
  3. 김수욱 (2005), "공급사슬통합 유형과 다각화 전략의 연계", 경영학연구, 34(2), 471-496.
  4. 김수욱, 장정주, 이성호, 최강화 (2006), "공급사슬 통합 구성요소들이 공급사슬 관리 및 기업성과에 미치는 영향", 대한경영학회지, 19(3), 987-1014.
  5. 김형욱, 윤선희 (2005), "공급사슬상의 파트너십이 공급사슬통합에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 정보공유와 정보품질의 매개역할을 중심으로", 한국생산관리학회지, 16(1), 183-208.
  6. 박철순 (2012), "공급사슬 통합과 기업 성과의 관계", 경영학연구, 41(6), 1601-1627.
  7. 정의범, 조부연, 김대수 (2015), "공급사슬통합 수준과 모니터링 유형의 적합성에 대한 실증 연구", 한국생산관리학회지, 26(4), 511-530.
  8. 허대식, 김효진 (2015), "구매기업의 공급기업 통합이 시장대응성에 미치는 효과: 내부통합과 가치일치성의 조절효과를 중심으로", 한국생산관리학회지, 26(4), 485-510.
  9. 조연성 (2015), "원자재 수출입 기업의 전략적 공급사슬지향성과 공급사슬 성과의 관계에서 혁신활동과 정보공유 활동의 매개역할", 통상정보연구, 17(1), 193-214.
  10. 한국생산성본부 (2016), MPS제조업생산성패널조사, http://mps.kpc.or.kr/plan/plan03.asp.
  11. Autry, C.W., Rose, W.J. and Bell, J.E. (2014), "Reconsidering the supply chain integration performance relationship: in search of theoretical consistency and clarity", Journal of Business Logistics, 35(3), 275-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12059
  12. Bagchi, P. K., and Skjoett-Larsen, T. (2003), "Integration of information technology and organizations in a supply chain", The International Journal of Logistics Management, 14(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090310806477
  13. Barney, J. B. (1991), "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage", Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  14. Barney, J. B. (2012), "Purchasing, supply chain management and sustained competitive advantage: The relevance of resource-based theory", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48 (2), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2012.03265.x
  15. Barratt, M. (2004), "Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(1), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540410517566
  16. Benton, W.C. and Maloni, M. (2005), "The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction", Journal of Operations Management, 23(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.09.002
  17. Carr, A. S., Kaynak, H., and Muthusamy, S. (2008), "The crossfunctionaI coordination between operations, marketing, purchasing and engineering and the impact on performance", International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 13(1), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMTM.2008.015973
  18. Chen, I. J., Paulraj, A., and Lado, A. A. (2004), "Strategic purchasing, supply management, and firm performance", Journal of operations management, 22(5), 505-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.06.002
  19. Coppini, M., Rossignoli, C., Rossi, T., and Strozzi, F. (2010), "Bullwhip effect and inventory oscillations analysis using the beer game model", International Journal of Production Research, 48(13), 3943-3956. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540902896204
  20. Cousins, P. D., and Menguc, B. (2006), "The implications of socialization and integration in supply chain management", Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 604-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.09.001
  21. Danese, P., and Romano, P. (2011), "Supply chain integration and efficiency performance: a study on the interactions between customer and supplier integration", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 220-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111139044
  22. Danese, P., Romano, P., and Formentini, M. (2013), "The impact of supply chain integration on responsiveness: The moderating effect of using an international supplier network", Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 49(1), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2012.08.002
  23. Das, A., Narasimhan, R., and Talluri, S. (2006), "Supplier integration-finding an optimal configuration," Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 563-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.09.003
  24. Devaraj, S., Krajewski, L., and Wei, J. C. (2007), "Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: the role of production information integration in the supply chain", Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1199-1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.002
  25. Droge, C., Vickery, S. K., and Jacobs, M. A. (2012), "Does supply chain integration mediate the relationships between product/process strategy and service performance? An empirical study", International Journal of Production Economics, 137(2), 250-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.005
  26. Dyer, J. H., and Hatch, N. W. (2006), "Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: creating advantage through network relationships", Strategic management Journal, 27(8), 701-719. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.543
  27. Dyer, J. H., and Singh, H. (1998), "The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage", Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.1255632
  28. Fabbe-Costes, N. and Jahre, M. (2008), "Supply chain integration and performance: a review of the evidence", The International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(2), 130-154. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090810895933
  29. Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., and Zhao, X. (2010), "The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach", Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.06.001
  30. Frohlich, M. T., and Westbrook, R. (2001), "Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies", Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00055-3
  31. Germain, R., and Iyer, K. N. (2006), "The interaction of internal and downstream integration and its association with performance", Journal of Business Logistics, 27(2), 29-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2006.tb00216.x
  32. Gimenez, C., van der Vaart, T., and Pieter van Donk, D. (2012), "Supply chain integration and performance: the moderating effect of supply complexity", International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 32(5), 583-610. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571211226506
  33. Gunasekaran, A., and Ngai, E. W. (2004), "Information systems in supply chain integration and management", European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 269-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.016
  34. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th eds. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person Education, Inc.
  35. He, Y., and Lai, K. K. (2012), "Supply chain integration and service oriented transformation: Evidence from Chinese equipment manufacturers", International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 791-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.10.013
  36. Johnson, M., and Templar, S. (2011), "The relationships between supply chain and firm performance: The development and testing of a unified proxy", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(2), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031111118512
  37. Kannan, V. R., and Choon Tan, K. (2010), "Supply chain integration: cluster analysis of the impact of span of integration", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(3), 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541011039965
  38. Koufteros, X. A., Cheng, T. E., and Lai, K. H. (2007), ""Black-box" and "gray-box" supplier integration in product development: Antecedents, consequences and the moderating role of firm size", Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 847-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.10.009
  39. Koufteros, X., Vonderembse, M., and Jayaram, J. (2005), "Internal and external integration for product development: the contingency effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy", Decision Sciences, 36(1), 97-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2005.00067.x
  40. Lavie, D. (2006), "The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource based view", Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638-658. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318922
  41. Lee, C. W., Kwon, I. W., and Severance, D. (2007), "Relationship between supply chain performance and degree of linkage among supplier, internal integration, and customer", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(6), 444-452. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540710826371
  42. Lee, H. L., So, K. C., and Tang, C. S. (2000), "The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain", Management Science, 46(5), 626-643. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.5.626.12047
  43. Li, G., Yang, H., Sun, L., and Sohal, A. S. (2009), "The impact of IT implementation on supply chain integration and performance", International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.017
  44. Liu, H., Ke, W., Kee Wei, K., and Hua, Z. (2013), "Effects of supply chain integration and market orientation on firm performance: Evidence from China", International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 33(3), 322-346. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571311300809
  45. Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K. K., Gu, J., and Chen, H. (2010), "The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firm's intention to adopt internet-enabled supply chain management systems", Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 372-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.11.010
  46. Mahoney, J. T. (1992), "The choice of organizational form: vertical financial ownership versus other methods of vertical integration", Strategic Management Journal, 13(8), 559-584. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130802
  47. Marquez, A. C., Bianchi, C., and Gupta, J. N. (2004), "Operational and financial effectiveness of e-collaboration tools in supply chain integration", European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 348-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.020
  48. Mesquita, L. F., Anand, J., and Brush, T. H. (2008), "Comparing the resource-based and relational views: knowledge transfer and spillover in vertical alliances", Strategic Management Journal, 29(9), 913-941. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.699
  49. Pagell, M. (2004), "Understanding the factors that enable and inhibit the integration of operations, purchasing and logistics", Journal of Operations Management, 22(5), 459-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.05.008
  50. Paulraj, A., Lado, A. A., and Chen, I. J. (2008), "Inter-organizational communication as a relational competency, antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer-supplier relationships", Journal of Operations Management, 26(1), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.04.001
  51. Perols, J., Zimmermann, C., and Kortmann, S. (2013), "On the relationship between supplier integration and time-to-market", Journal of Operations Management, 31(3), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.11.002
  52. Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., and Ragatz, G. L. (2005), "Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design", Journal of Operations Management, 23(3), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.07.009
  53. Quesada, G., Rachamadugu, R., Gonzalez, M., and Luis Martinez, J. (2008), "Linking order winning and external supply chain integration strategies", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(4), 296-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540810882189
  54. Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., and Seth, N. (2006), "Firm performance impacts of digitally-enabled supply chain integration capabilities", MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 225-246. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148729
  55. Rosenzweig, E. D., Roth, A. V., & Dean, J. W. (2003), "The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: an exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers", Journal of Operations Management, 21(4), 437-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(03)00037-8
  56. Saeed, K. A., Malhotra, M. K., and Grover, V. (2005), "Examining the impact of interorganizational systems on process efficiency and sourcing leverage in buyer-supplier dyads", Decision Sciences, 36(3), 365-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2005.00077.x
  57. Stank, T. P., Keller, S. B., and Closs, D. J. (2001a), "Performance benefits of supply chain logistical integration", Transportation Journal, 41(2/3), 32-46.
  58. Stevens, G. C. (1989), "Integrating the supply chain", International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, 19(8), 3-8.
  59. Stevens, G. C., and Johnson, M. (2016), "Integrating the Supply Chain... 25 years on", International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 46(1), 19-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-07-2015-0175
  60. Swink, M., Narasimhan, R., and Wang, C. (2007), "Managing beyond the factory walls: Effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance", Journal of Operations Management, 25(1), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.02.006
  61. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., and Lauro, C. (2005), "PLS path modeling", Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
  62. Tracey, M. (2004), "A holistic approach to new product development: new insights", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(3), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2004.tb00177.x
  63. Trent, R. J., and Monczka, R. M. (1998), "Purchasing and supply management: trends and changes throughout the 1990s", International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 34(3), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1998.tb00296.x
  64. Vachon, S., and Klassen, R. D. (2008), "Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain", International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 299-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.030
  65. van der Vaart, T., and van Donk, D. P. (2008), "A critical review of survey-based research in supply chain integration", International Journal of Production Economics, 111(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.10.011
  66. Vickery, S. K., Jayaram, J., Droge, C., and Calantone, R. (2003), "The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships", Journal of Operations Management, 21(5), 523-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.02.002
  67. Williamson, O. E. (1985), The economic institutions of capitalism, Simon and Schuster.
  68. Wong, C. Y., and Boon-itt, S. (2008), "The influence of institutional norms and environmental uncertainty on supply chain integration in the Thai automotive industry", International Journal of Production Economics, 115(2), 400-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.05.012
  69. Zailani, S., & Rajagopal, P. (2005), "Supply chain integration and performance: US versus East Asian companies", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(5), 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540510624205
  70. Zhao, L., Huo, B., Sun, L., and Zhao, X. (2013), "The impact of supply chain risk on supply chain integration and company performance: a global investigation", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(2), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541311318773
  71. Zhao, X., Xie, J., and Zhang, W. J. (2002), "The impact of information sharing and ordering co-ordination on supply chain performance", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7(1), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540210414364