The Relation between Trade Volume and Regional Trade Agreements

지역무역협정(RTA)과 국가 간 무역량 결정요인 분석

  • 안소영 (연세대학교 바른ICT연구소) ;
  • 배연호 (대구대학교 무역학과)
  • Received : 2016.11.28
  • Accepted : 2016.12.17
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

Using the gravity model, this paper analyzes empirically how the world trade in goods is affected by regional trade agreements(RTAs) which have been spreading rapidly since the mid-1990s. This paper attempt to do the panel data analysis about 174 countries during the period of 1994-2008. These panel data include 157 RTAs. It is meaningful that this paper uses comprehensive data to analyze the net effect of regional trade agreements on the global trade volume. This provides a clue as to the answer to the stumbling block debate raised early in the regional trade agreement. Also, confirming how the participation of the WTO affected the trade volume among the member countries, the WTO-related dummy variables are additionally introduced to this gravity model. And as far as we know, the state system-related variables is first considered in this model. This variable reflects the social and cultural environments of countries as the proxy variable representing the sociocultural homogeneity. In all regressions, joining to the WTO and consistency of the state system have a positive effect on increasing the trade volumes between countries. According to the analysis of RTA trade effects, RTAs, on average, increase the volume of trade within the RTA region by 27%~37%, and decrease the volume of trade between the regional and the non-regional nation by 1.2%~3.4%.Therefore, the net effect of regional trade agreements on the promotion of global welfare is positive. For robustness check, we also introduce the interaction term of the dummy variable which reflects the RTA tightening and the continuous variable which reflects the distance effect. As a result, the RTAs alleviate the trade-decreasing effect which is caused by the distance between the countries.

Keywords

References

  1. 강보경, "중력모형을 이용한 동아시아 지역의 경제통합에 대한 무역창출효과 분석", 산업경제연구 제22권 제4호, 산업경제학회, 2009. 8.
  2. 김만길.정재완, "한국과 미국, EU의 FTA 협정 상 원산지검증에 대한 비교연구", 무역상무연구 제58권, 한국무역상무학회, 2013. 5.
  3. 김형주, "국가 간 무역구조의 특성을 고려한 지역무역협정의 무역효과", 국제경제연구 제13권 제1호, 국제경제학회, 2007. 4.
  4. 남상욱, "동태적 패널모형을 통한 무역보험의 거시경제효과 연구", 무역상무연구 제61권, 한국무역상무학회, 2014. 2.
  5. 배연호, "정보통신기술과 외국인간접투자 결정요인 분석", 국제경제연구 제17권 제3호, 국제경제학회, 2011. 12.
  6. 신관호.이종화.박인원, "한국경제의 분석: 지역무역협정의 경제적 효과와 동아시아 지역주의에의 시사점", 한국경제의 분석 제10권 제1호, 한국금융연구원, 2004. 4.
  7. 유자영, "중국의 대 한국 직접투자 특징 분석 및 투자확대 방안 연구", 무역상무연구 제70권, 한국무역상무학회, 2016. 5.
  8. 이홍식 외 3인, "한.중.일 자유무역협정(FTA)의 경제성장효과", 정책연구 제4권 제2호, 대외경제정책연구원, 2004. 2.
  9. 이홍식 외 3인, "지역무역협정에 따른 생산성효과 분석", 대외경제정책연구원. 2006.
  10. Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H., "Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade?", Journal of international Economics, Vol.71, No.1, 2007.
  11. Bhagwati, J., Regionalism and Multilateralism: an overview, Chapter2., Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  12. Bhagwati, J. & Panagariya, A., Preferential Trading Areas and Multilateralism-Strangers, Friends, or Foes?, Chapter2, University of Maryland, 1996.
  13. Egger, P., "A note on the proper econometric specification of the gravity equation", Economics Letters, Vol.66, No.1, 2000.
  14. Elliott, R. J., & Ikemoto, K., "AFTA and the Asian Crisis: Help or Hindrance to ASEAN Intra-Regional Trade?", Asian Economic Journal, Vol.18, No.1, 2004.
  15. Frankel, J. A., "Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System", Institute for International Economics, ISBN paper 0-88132-202-4, 1997.
  16. Krugman. P., Regionalism and Multilateralism: analytical notes, Chapter3, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  17. Panagariya, A., "Preferential trade liberalization: the traditional theory and new developments", Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.38, No.2, 2000.
  18. Rose, A. K., "Do We Really Know That The WTO Increases Trade?", The American Economic Review, Vol.94, No.1, 2004.
  19. Wonnacott, P., & Lutz, M., "Is there a case for free trade areas?", Free trade areas and US trade policy, 1989.
  20. Wooldridge, J. M., Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2002.