Journal of Technology Innovation (기술혁신연구)

Korea Society for Innovation Managemetn & Economics (기술경영경제학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research Dynamics in Innovation Studies Using Text Mining

텍스트 마이닝을 이용한 혁신 분야의 국외 연구 동향 분석

  • Received : 2016.10.12
  • Accepted : 2016.11.30
  • Published : 2016.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

For the past 50 years, innovation field has gone through an evolution. The range of research topics on innovation has expanded and diversified, along with a quantitative increase. In a multi-disciplinary field like innovation, to explore new topics and understand research trends, it is necessary to possess a comprehensive understanding regarding the current status of, and trends in, the research. In this study, the research trend in innovation studies from 2000 to 2015 was analyzed in a holistic perspective. For this, a novel technique, text mining was used. The result shows that innovation studies has focused on the traditional and emerging topics. Also, the differentiations has appeared in some of the traditional topics. This study provides not only an understanding of research dynamics, but also an opportunity to gain insights into the evolution of a new paradigm from an academic perspective.

지난 50년 동안 혁신 분야는 학문의 정착과 진화의 시기를 지나왔다. 시간이 흐름에 따라 연구 주제의 범위가 확장되고 다양해지고 있으며, 양적 측면에서도 증가 추세를 보이고 있다. 혁신 분야와 같이 다학제적인 분야에서 새로운 연구 주제를 탐색하고, 기존 연구의 흐름을 파악하는데 있어 연구 현황 및 동향에 대한 포괄적인 이해는 필수적이다. 본 연구에서는 텍스트 마이닝 기법을 이용해 2000년부터 2015년까지의 국외 혁신 분야의 연구 현황 및 동향을 거시적인 관점에서 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 혁신 분야에서는 전통적인 주제와 최근에 주목받고 있는 주제를 중심으로 연구가 이루어지고 있었으며, 일부 전통적인 주제에서 학문의 분화 현상이 나타났다. 연구 결과는 지난 16년 동안 혁신 분야에서 나타난 연구 주제의 현황 및 동향에 대한 이해를 도모할 것이며, 연구자들에게 새로운 패러다임이 정착하고 진화해가는 과정을 학술적 관점에서 통찰할 수 있는 기회를 제공할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 감주식.김무웅.박상대.현병환 (2012), "바이오 미래유망 연구분야 도출에 관한 연구", 기술혁신학회지, 제15권 제2호, pp. 345-368.
  2. 고재창.조근태.조윤호 (2013), "키워드 네트워크 분석을 통해 살펴본 기술경영의 최근 연구동향", 지능정보연구, 제19권 제2호, pp. 101-123. https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2013.19.2.101
  3. 김남규.박성욱.고미현.서신원 (2015),. "클라우드 컴퓨팅 기술의 연구동향 분석", 한국기술혁신학회학술대회, pp. 597-607.
  4. 남수현.박정민.설성수 (2005), "지식흐름의 계량분석", 기술혁신학회지, 제8권, pp. 337-359.
  5. 이기헌.정효정.송민 (2015), "문헌정보학 분야 핵심 학술지들의 가중 주제-방법 네트워크 분석", 한국문헌정보학회지, 제49권 제3호, pp. 457-488. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.3.457
  6. 이정구 (2015), "논문분석을 통한 멤브레인 이용 이산화탄소($CO_2$) 포집기술의 연구동향 분석", 한국기술혁신학회 학술대회, pp. 212-222.
  7. 장혜란.강길원.이은정.김승렬 (2012), "암유전자 연구주제 네트워크 분석", 기술혁신학회지, 제15권 제2호, pp. 369-399.
  8. 정효정.배정환.홍수린.박찬웅.송민 (2016), "정치적 이념에 따른 트위터 공간에서의 집단 간 의견 차이 분석", 한국언론학보, 제60권 제2호, pp. 269-302.
  9. 허정은.양창훈 (2013), "네트워크 분석을 통한 융합연구 구조 분석", 기술혁신학회지, 제16권 제4호, pp. 883-912.
  10. Abidin, S. B. Z., Mokhtar, S. S. B. and Yusoff, R. Z. B. (2011), "A Systematic Analysis of Innovation Studies: A Proposed Framework on Relationship between Innovation Process and Firm's Performance", The Asian Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 65-83.
  11. Baregheh, A., Rowley, J. and Sambrook, S. (2009), "Towards a Multidisciplinary Definition of Innovation", Management Decision, Vol. 47, No. 8, pp. 1323-1339. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578
  12. Blei, D. M. (2012), "Probabilistic Topic Models", Communications of the ACM, Vol. 55, No. 4, 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826
  13. Bogers, M., Afuah, A. and Bastian, B. (2010), "Users as Innovators: A Review, Critique, and Future Research Directions", Journal of Management, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 857-875 https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309353944
  14. Cancino, C., Merigo, J. M. and Palacios-Marques, D. (2015), "A Bibliometric Analysis of Innovation Research", ALTEC, 2015.
  15. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003), Open Innovation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  16. Crossan, M. M. and Apaydin, M. (2010), "A Multi Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature", Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 47, No. 6, pp. 1154-1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x
  17. Fagerberg, J. (2003), "Innovation: A Guide to the Literature (No. 20031012)", Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
  18. Godin, B. (2014), "Innovation Studies: Staking the Claim for a New Disciplinary", Tribe. Minerva, No. 52, pp. 489-495.
  19. Google Scholar Metrics (https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/metrics.html)
  20. Jiang, L. C., Wang, Z. Z., Peng, T. Q. and Zhu, J. J. (2015), "The Divided Communities of Shared Concerns: Mapping the Intellectual Structure of e-Health Research in Social Science Journals", International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 84, No. 1, pp. 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.09.003
  21. Lee, P. C. and Su, H. N. (2010), "Investigating the Structure of Regional Innovation System Research through Keyword Co-occurrence and Social Network Analysis", Innovation, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 26-40. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.1.26
  22. Lee, K., Jung, H. and Song, M. (2016), "Subject-method Topic Network Analysis in Communication Studies", Scientometrics, pp. 1-27.
  23. Liu, Z., Yin, Y., Liu, W. and Dunford, M. (2015), "Visualizing the Intellectual Structure and Evolution of Innovation Systems Research: A Bibliometric Analysis", Scientometrics, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 135-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1517-y
  24. Lundvall, B. A. (1992), National Innovation System: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter, London.
  25. Nelson, R. R. (Ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford university press.
  26. OECD and Eurostat. (2005), Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition. OECD Publishing, Paris.
  27. Omenn, G. S. (2006), "Grand Challenges and Great Opportunities in Science, Technology, and Public Policy", Science, Vol. 314, No. 5806, pp. 1696-1704. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1135003
  28. Radosevic, S. (2012), "Innovation Policy Studies between Theory and Practice: A Literature Review Based Analysis", STI Policy Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1-45. https://doi.org/10.22675/STIPR.2012.3.1.001
  29. Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M. and Oliveira, A. (2011), "Smart Cities and the Future Internet: Towards Cooperation Frameworks for Open Innovation", In: The Future Internet Assembly, pp. 431-446, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  30. Shafique, M. (2013), "Thinking Inside the Box? Intellectual Structure of the Knowledge Base of Innovation Research (1988-2008)", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 62-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2002
  31. Smits, R. (2002), "Innovation Studies in the 21st Century;: Questions from a User's Perspective", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 69, No. 9, pp. 861-883. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00181-0
  32. Song, M. and Kim, S. Y. (2013), "Detecting the Knowledge Structure of Bioinformatics by Mining Full-text Collections", Scientometrics, Vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0900-9
  33. Thongpapanl, N. T. (2012), "The Changing Landscape of Technology and Innovation Management: An Updated Ranking of Journals in the field", Technovation, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 257-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.01.001
  34. Yan, E., Ding, Y., Milojevic, S. and Sugimoto, C. R. (2012), "Topics in Dynamic Research Communities: An Exploratory Study for the Field of Information Retrieval", Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 140-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.10.001
  35. Yan, E. (2014), "Research Dynamics: Measuring the Continuity and Popularity of Research Topics", Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.10.010
  36. Yan, E. (2015), "Research Dynamics, Impact, and Dissemination: A Topic Level Analysis", Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 66, No. 11, pp. 2357-2372. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23324