Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • Volume 38
  • /
  • Pages.27.1-27.9
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cranial bone regeneration according to different particle sizes and densities of demineralized dentin matrix in the rabbit model

  • Nam, Jin-Woo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Moon-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Han, Se-Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2016.04.19
  • Accepted : 2016.06.20
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to place bone graft materials in cranial defects in a rabbit model and compare their bone regenerating ability according to the size and density of demineralized dentin matrix (DDM). Methods: We selected nine healthy male rabbits that were raised under the same conditions and that weighed about 3 kg. Two circular defects 8 mm in diameter were created in each side of the cranium. The defects were grafted with DDM using four different particle sizes and densities: 0.1 mL of 0.25- to 1.0-mm particles (group 1); 0. 2 mL of 0.25- to 1.0-mm particles (group 2); 0.1 mL of 1.0- to 2.0-mm particles (group 3); and 0.2 mL of 1.0- to 2. 0-mm particles (group 4). After 2, 4, and 8 weeks, the rabbits were sacrificed, and bone samples were evaluated by means of histologic, histomorphometric, and quantitative RT-PCR analysis. Results: In group 1, osteoblast activity and bone formation were greater than in the other three groups on histological examination. In groups 2, 3, and 4, dense connective tissue was seen around original bone even after 8 weeks. Histomorphometric analysis of representative sections in group 1 showed a higher rate of new bone formation, but the difference from the other groups was not statistically significant. RT-PCR analysis indicated a correlation between bone formation and protein (osteonectin and osteopontin) expression. Conclusions: DDM with a space between particles of $200{\mu}m$ was effective in bone formation, suggesting that materials with a small particle size could reasonably be used for bone grafting.

Keywords

References

  1. Boyne PJ (1973) Induction of bone repair by various bone grafting materials, hard tissue growth, repair and remineralization. Ciba Found Symp 11:121-128
  2. Masters DH (1988) Implants, bone and bone substitutes. Calif Dent Asso J 16:56-65
  3. Jarcho M (1981) Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics. Clin Orthop 157:259-278
  4. Arrington ED, Smith WJ, Chambers HG, Bucknell AL, Davino NA (1996) Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329:300-309 https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199608000-00037
  5. Goulet JA, Senunas LE, DeSilva GL, Greenfield ML (1997) Autogenous iliac crest bone graft: complications and functional assessment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 339:76-81 https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199706000-00011
  6. Lane JM (1995) Bone graft substitutes. West J Med 163:565-566
  7. Hislop WD, Finlay PM, Moos KF (1993) A preliminary study into the uses of anorganic bone in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31:149-153 https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(93)90113-B
  8. Buring K, Urist MR (1967) Effects of ionizing radiation on the bone induction principle in the matrix of bone implants. Clin Orthop 44:225-234
  9. Mellonig JT, Prewett AB, Moyer MP (1992) HIV inactivation in a bone allograft. J Periodontol 63:979-983 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.12.979
  10. Jarcho M (1986) Biomaterial aspects of calcium phosphate. Dent Clin N Am 30:25-47
  11. Kim SY, Kim SG, Lim SC, Bae CS (2004) Effects on bone formation in ovariectomized rats after implantation of tooth ash and plaster of Paris mixture. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:852-857 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2003.12.023
  12. Kim YK, Lee JH, Kim KY, Um IW, Murata M, Ito K (2013) Analysis of organic components and osteoinductivity in autogenous tooth bone graft material. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 35:353-359
  13. Kim YK, Lee HJ, Kim KY, Kim SG, Um IW (2011) Guide bone regeneration using autogenous teeth: case reports. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:142-147 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2011.37.2.142
  14. Kim SG, Chung CH, Kim YK, Park JC, Lim SC (2002) The use of particulate dentinplaster of Paris combination with/without plate-rich plasma in the treatment of bone defects around implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17:86-94
  15. Lynch SEMR, Nevins M, Wisner-Lynch LA (2008) Tissue engineering: applications in maxillofacial surgery and periodontics, 2nd edn. Quintessence, Chicago
  16. Shirota T, Ohno K, Motohashi M, Mishi K (1996) Histologic and microradiologic comparison of block and particulate cancellous bone and marrow grafts in reconstructed mandibles being considered for dental implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54:15-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90294-3
  17. Isaksson S, Alberius P, Klinge B, Jonsson J (1992) Contribution of autogenic membranous bone chips and bone paste to healing of rabbit skull defects. Scand J Dent Res 100:274-278
  18. Fonseca RJ, Clark PJ, Burker EJ, Baker RD (1980) Revascularization and healing of onlay particulate autologous bone grafts in primates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:572-577
  19. Melloning JT, Levey R (1984) The effect of different sizes of freeze dried bone allograft on bone growth. J Dent Res 63:222
  20. Robinson E (1969) Osseous coagulum for bone induction. J Periodontol 40:503-510 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1969.40.9.503
  21. Rivault AF, Toto PD, Levy S, Gargiulo AW (1971) Autogenous bone grafts: osseous coagulum and osseous retrograde procedures in primates. J Periodontol 42:787-796 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1971.42.12.787
  22. Shapoff CA, Bowers GM, Levy B, Mellonig JT, Yukna RA (1980) The effect of particle size on the osteogenic activity of composite grafts of allogenic freeze-dried bone and autogenous marrow. J Periodontol 51:625-630 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1980.51.11.625
  23. Pallesen L, Schou S, Aaboe M, Hjorting-Hansen E, Nattestad A, Melsen F (2002) Influence of particle size of autogenous bone grafts on the early stage of bone regeneration. A histologic and stereologic study in rabbit calvarium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17:498-506
  24. Hall EE, Meffert RM, Hermann JS, Mellonig JT, Cochran DL (1999) Comparison of bioactive glass to DFDB in the treatment of intrabony defects around implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 70:526-535 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.5.526
  25. Fucini SE, Quintero G, Gher ME, Black BS, Richardson AC (1993) Small versus large particles of DFDBs in human intrabony periodontal defects. J Periodontol 64:844-847 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.9.844
  26. Urist MR, Silverman BF, Buring K, Dubuc FL, Rosenberg JM (1967) The bone induction principle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 53:243-283
  27. Kim KY, Yeo IS, Kim SG, Um IW (2011) Analysis of crystalline structure of autogenous tooth bone graft material: X-ray diffraction analysis. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:142-147 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2011.37.2.142
  28. Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH, Lee HJ, Um IU, Lim SC et al (2010) Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:496-503 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.017
  29. Glowacki J, Mulliken JB (1980) Induced osteogenesis for repair and construction in the craniofacial region. Plast Reconstr Surg 65:553-560 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198005000-00001
  30. Yim CJ (1998) Oral and maxillofacial reconstruction with bone allograft. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 56:706-714
  31. Glowacki J, Mulliken JB (1985) Demineralized implants. Clin Plast Surg 12:233-241
  32. Klawitter JJ, Hulbert SF (1971) Application of porous ceramics for the attachment of load bearing internal orthopedic application. J Biomed Master Res Sympos 2:161
  33. Pederson KN, Haanaes HR, Lyng S (1974) Tissue ingrowth into mandibular intrabony porous ceramic implants. Int J Oral Surg 3:158 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(74)80020-7
  34. Chang BS, Lee CK, Hong KS (2000) Osteoconduction at porous hydroxyapatite with various pore configurations. Biomaterials 21:1291-1298 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00030-2
  35. Flautre B, Descamps M, Delecourt C (2001) Porous HA ceramic for bone replacement: role of the pores and interconnections experimental study in the rabbit. J Mater Sci Mater Med 12:679-682 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011256107282
  36. Akazawa T, Murata M, Sasaki T (2006) Biodegradation and bioabsorption innovation of the functionally graded bovine bone oriented apatite with blood permeability. J Biomed Mater Res 76:44-51
  37. Tamai N, Myoui A, Tomita T (2002) Novel hydroxyapatite ceramics with an interconnetive porous structure exhibit superior osteoconduction in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 59:110-117 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1222

Cited by

  1. Improved autologous cortical bone harvest and viability with 2Flute otologic burs : Cortical Bone Viability vol.128, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26779
  2. Rabbit Calvarial Defect Model for Customized 3D-Printed Bone Grafts vol.24, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0474
  3. Physiochemical characterization and biological effect of anorganic bovine bone matrix and organic-containing bovine bone matrix in comparison with Bio-Oss in rabbits vol.33, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328218804926
  4. Nano-Structured Demineralized Human Dentin Matrix to Enhance Bone and Dental Repair and Regeneration vol.9, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9051013
  5. 3D-Printed Ceramic Bone Scaffolds with Variable Pore Architectures vol.21, pp.18, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21186942
  6. Microcomputed Tomography and Histological Study of Bone Regeneration Using Tooth Biomaterial with BMP-2 in Rabbit Calvarial Defects vol.2021, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6690221
  7. Allogeneic Dentin Graft: A Review on Its Osteoinductivity and Antigenicity vol.14, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14071713
  8. Bone Conduction Capacity of Highly Porous 3D-Printed Titanium Scaffolds Based on Different Pore Designs vol.14, pp.14, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14143892
  9. SEM and FT-MIR Analysis of Human Demineralized Dentin Matrix: An In Vitro Study vol.12, pp.3, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031480