Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • Volume 38
  • /
  • Pages.19.1-19.4
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Frequency of bone graft in implant surgery

  • Cha, Hyun-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Wan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Hwang, Jong-Hyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Ahn, Kang-Min (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center)
  • Received : 2016.02.12
  • Accepted : 2016.03.14
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Implant surgery has become popular with the advance of surgical techniques such as sinus lifting, guided bone regeneration, and block bone graft. However, there were no data about the frequency of bone graft during implant surgery. The purpose of this study was to report the frequency and types of bone graft depending on dental implant patients' profile to complement the database regarding implant surgery. Methods: The implant operations had been performed from January 2006 to October 2014. The upper and lower jaws were divided into six sextants. A total of 792 sextants were included in this study. Patient information including sex, age, sites, bone graft, and types of bone were investigated. Results: A total of 1512 implants had been placed. Male and female sextants were 421 and 371, respectively (M:F = 1:0.88). Average age was 54.3 (ranging from 20 to 88 years old). Implants were placed in the posterior maxilla (322 sextants, 40.7 %), posterior mandible (286 sextants, 36.1 %), anterior maxilla (127 sextants, 16.1 %), and anterior mandible (57 sextants, 7.2 %). Bone graft was performed in 50.3 % of the sextants. Among the bone grafted sites, sinus lifting with lateral approach (22.1 %) and guided bone regeneration (22.7 %) were performed most frequently. Conclusions: Bone graft in implant surgery was necessary to augment defects. More than half of the sextants needed bone graft for implant installation.

Keywords

References

  1. Cha HS, Kim A, Nowzari H, Chang HS, Ahn KM (2014) Simultaneous sinus lift and implant installation: prospective study of consecutive two hundred seventeen sinus lift and four hundred sixty-two implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 16:337-347 https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12012
  2. Kim JH, Kim YK, Bae JH (2013) Retrospective clinical study on sinus bone graft and tapered-body implant placement. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:77-84 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.2.77
  3. Gonzalez S, Tuan MC, Ahn KM, Nowzari H (2014) Crestal approach for maxillary sinus augmentation in patients with https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12067
  4. Vernazza CR, Rousseau N, Steele JG, Ellis JS, Thomason JM, Eastham J et al (2015) Introducing high-cost health care to patients: dentists' accounts of offering dental implant treatment. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 43:75-85 https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12129
  5. Millennium Research G (2002) European markets for dental implants 2001: executive summary. Implant Dent 11:7-12 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200201000-00003
  6. Palmqvist S, Soderfeldt B, Arnbjerg D (1991) Subjective need for implant dentistry in a Swedish population aged 45-69 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2:99-102 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020301.x
  7. Parker HM, Miller RD (1989) Dental implants and third party carrier coverage. Dent Clin North Am 33:905-909
  8. Kim A, Kar K, Nowzari H, Cha HS, Ahn KM (2013) Immediate free iliac bone graft after nonsegmental mandibular resection and delayed implant placement: a case series. Implant Dent 22:438-443 https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31829f1ed0
  9. Kim A, Kar K, Nowzari H, Ahn KM, Cha H (2012) Subapical osteotomy to correct dental implant malpositioning and vertical ridge deficiency: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 108:204-208
  10. Ko SH, Chang YY, Um YJ, Jung UW, Kim CS, Cho KS et al (2009) An 8-year survival rate of immediate implants: retrospective study. J Kor Dent Assoc 47:758-768
  11. Ribeiro CG, Bittencourt TC, Ferreira CF, Assis NM (2014) An alternative approach for augmenting the anterior maxilla using autogenous free gingival bone graft for implant retained prosthesis. J Oral Implantol 40:183-187 https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00016
  12. Chen ST, Buser D (2014) Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla-a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29(Suppl):186-215
  13. Wakimoto M, Matsumura T, Ueno T, Mizukawa N, Yanagi Y, Iida S (2012) Bone quality and quantity of the anterior maxillary trabecular bone in dental implant sites. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:1314-1319 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02347.x
  14. Buser D, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Frei M, Belser UC (2013) Long-term stability of contour augmentation with early implant placement following single tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: a prospective, cross-sectional study in 41 patients with a 5- to 9-year follow-up. J Periodontol 84:1517-1527
  15. Buser D, Chappuis V, Kuchler U, Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Buser R et al (2013) Long-term stability of early implant placement with contour augmentation. J Dent Res 92:176S-182S https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513504949
  16. Noia CF, Ortega-Lopes R, Ricardo de Albergaria Barbosa J, Barbeiro RH, Mazzonetto R (2012) Evaluation of patients' perceptions of alterations after chin bone graft harvesting. Implant Dent 21:411-414 https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31826a4f9c
  17. Cho YS, Hwang KG, Park CJ (2013) Postoperative effects of anterior nasal spine bone harvesting on overall nasal shape. Clin Oral Implants Res 24:618-622 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02428.x
  18. Tatum H Jr (1986) Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin N Am 30:207-229
  19. Markovic A, Misic T, Calvo-Guirado JL, Delgado-Ruiz RA, Janjic B, Abboud M (2015) Two-center prospective, randomized, clinical, and radiographic study comparing osteotome sinus floor elevation with or without bone graft and simultaneous implant placement. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. doi:10.1111/cid.12373. [Epub ahead of print]
  20. Mertens C, Wiens D, Steveling HG, Sander A, Freier K (2014) Maxillary sinus-floor elevation with nanoporous biphasic bone graft material for early implant placement. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 16:365-373 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00484.x

Cited by

  1. The effect of 4-hexylresorcinol on xenograft degradation in a rat calvarial defect model vol.38, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0076-y
  2. A Simple Surgical Guide for Horizontal Bone Graft: A Technical Note vol.3, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.18204/jissis.2016.3.2.090
  3. A 10-Year Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Observation of the Buccal Bony Wall of an Immediately Placed Implant at the Anterior Maxilla: A Case Report vol.44, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-17-00159
  4. Autologous Osteoblast-cell Therapy in Orthodontics and Implantology: A Single-center Experience of Nine Patients vol.9, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10012-1184
  5. Silk Protein-Based Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration vol.8, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8081214
  6. Bilateral maxillary augmentation using CAD/CAM manufactured allogenic bone blocks for restoration of congenitally missing teeth: A case report vol.31, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12454
  7. La gestion osseuse des sites d’agénésie d’incisives latérales vol.53, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1051/odf/2019016
  8. Short implants (≤6 mm) versus longer implants with sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.9, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029826
  9. Stress Distribution on the Prosthetic Screws in the All-on-4 Concept: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis vol.46, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-19-00090
  10. Physical/Chemical Properties and Resorption Behavior of a Newly Developed Ca/P/S-Based Bone Substitute Material vol.13, pp.16, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13163458
  11. Development prospects of curable osteoplastic materials in dentistry and maxillofacial surgery vol.6, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04686
  12. Lateral Window Design for Maxillary Sinus Graft Based on the Implant Position vol.17, pp.17, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176335
  13. Regenerative Medicine Technologies to Treat Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Defects vol.9, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.704048
  14. Biocompatibility study of modified injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogel with mannitol/BSA to alveolar bone cells vol.35, pp.10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328220971746
  15. Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments vol.26, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26103007
  16. Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study vol.10, pp.17, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173953
  17. A customized allogenic bone block for alveolar reconstruction quantitated by a 3D matching technique: A case report vol.9, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.4771
  18. Postoperative Study of Bone Gain in Mandibular Alveolar Bone Reconstructed with Screw-Guided Bone Regeneration Technique and Porcine-Derived Xenograft in 42 Edentulous Patient Candidates for Implant-P vol.11, pp.21, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11219826
  19. Fluctuation in salivary alpha-amylase activity and vital signs during dental implant surgery vol.7, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00339-6