DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluating Correlation between Geometrical Relationship and Dose Difference Caused by Respiratory Motion Using Statistical Analysis

  • Shin, Dong-Seok (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kang, Seong-Hee (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Su (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Ho (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Kyeong-Hyeon (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Cho, Min-Seok (Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Noh, Yu-Yoon (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Yoon, Do-Kun (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Suh, Tae Suk (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2016.11.10
  • Accepted : 2016.12.20
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

Dose differences between three-dimensional (3D) and four-dimensional (4D) doses could be varied according to the geometrical relationship between a planning target volume (PTV) and an organ at risk (OAR). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the correlation between the overlap volume histogram (OVH), which quantitatively shows the geometrical relationship between the PTV and OAR, and the dose differences. 4D computed tomography (4DCT) images were acquired for 10 liver cancer patients. Internal target volume-based treatment planning was performed. A 3D dose was calculated on a reference phase (end-exhalation). A 4D dose was accumulated using deformation vector fields between the reference and other phase images of 4DCT from deformable image registration, and dose differences between the 3D and 4D doses were calculated. An OVH between the PTV and selected OAR (duodenum) was calculated and quantified on the basis of specific overlap volumes that corresponded to 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% of the OAR volume overlapped with the expanded PTV. Statistical analysis was performed to verify the correlation with the OVH and dose difference for the OAR. The minimum mean dose difference was 0.50 Gy from case 3, and the maximum mean dose difference was 4.96 Gy from case 2. The calculated range of the correlation coefficients between the OVH and dose difference was from -0.720 to -0.712, and the R-square range for regression analysis was from 0.506 to 0.518 (p-value <0.05). However, when the 10% overlap volume was applied in the six cases that had OVH value ${\leq}2$, the average percent mean dose differences were $34.80{\pm}12.42%$. Cases with quantified OVH values of 2 or more had mean dose differences of $29.16{\pm}11.36%$. In conclusion, no significant statistical correlation was found between the OVH and dose differences. However, it was confirmed that a higher difference between the 3D and 4D doses could occur in cases that have smaller OVH value.

Keywords

References

  1. Low DA, Nystrom M, Kalinin E, et al: A method for the reconstruction of four-dimensional synchronized CT scans acquired during free breathing. Med Phys 30(6):1254-1263 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1576230
  2. Pan T, Lee T-Y, Rietzel E, Chen GTY: 4D-CT imaging of a volume influenced by respiratory motion on multi-slice CT. Med Phys 31(2):333-340 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1639993
  3. Keall P: 4-dimensional computed tomography imaging and treatment planning. Semin Radiat Oncol. 14(1):81-90 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semradonc.2003.10.006
  4. Ohara K, Okumura T, Akisada M, et al: Irradiation synchronized with respiration gate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17(4):853-857 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(89)90078-3
  5. Hideo DK, Bruce CH: Respiration gated radiotherapy treatment: a technical study. Phys Med Biol 41(1):83 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/41/1/007
  6. Hanley J, Debois MM, Mah D, et al: Deep inspiration breath-hold technique for lung tumors: the potential value of target immobilization and reduced lung density in dose escalation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45(3):603-611 (1999)
  7. Underberg RWM, Lagerwaard FJ, Cuijpers JP, Slotman BJ, van Sörnsen de Koste JR, Senan S al: Four-dimensional CT scans for treatment planning in stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60(4):1283-1290 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.665
  8. Wu B, Pang D, Simari P, Taylor R, Sanguineti G, McNutt T: Using overlap volume histogram and IMRT plan data to guide and automate VMAT planning: A head-and-neck case study. Med Phys 40(2):021714 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4788671
  9. Brock KK, McShan DL, Ten Haken RK, Hollister SJ, Dawson LA, Balter JM: Inclusion of organ deformation in dose calculations. Med Phys 30(3):290-295 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1539039
  10. Starkschall G, Britton K, McAleer MF, et al: Potential dosimetric benefits of four-dimensional radiation treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73(5):1560-1565 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.024
  11. Valdes G, Robinson C, Lee P, et al: Tumor control probability and the utility of 4D vs 3D dose calculations for stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer. Med Dosim 40(1):64-69 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2014.10.002
  12. Yeo UA, Taylor ML, Supple JR, et al: Evaluation of dosimetric misrepresentations from 3D conventional planning of liver SBRT using 4D deformable dose integration. J Appl Clin Med Phys 15(6):188-203 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4978
  13. Jung SH, Yoon SM, Park SH, et al: Four-dimensional dose evaluation using deformable image registration in radiotherapy for liver cancer. Med Phys 40(1):011706 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4769427
  14. Starkschall G, Gibbons JP, Orton CG: To ensure that target volumes are not underirradiated when respiratory motion may affect the dose distribution, 4D dose calculations should be performed. Med Phys 36(1):1-3 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3031115
  15. Kazhdan M, Simari P, McNutt T, et al: A shape relationship descriptor for radiation therapy planning. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 12(Pt 2):100-108 (2009)
  16. Wu B, Ricchetti F, Sanguineti G, et al: Patient geometry-driven information retrieval for IMRT treatment plan quality control. Med Phys 36(12):5497-5505 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3253464
  17. Yang D, Brame S, El Naqa I, et al: Technical Note: DIRART - A software suite for deformable image registration and adaptive radiotherapy research. Med Phys 38(1):67-77 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3521468
  18. Wang J, Jin X, Zhao K, et al: Patient feature based dosimetric Pareto front prediction in esophageal cancer radiotherapy. Med Phys 42(2):1005-1011 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4906252
  19. Remouchamps VM, Vicini FA, Sharpe MB, Kestin LL, Marinez AA, Wong JW: Significant reductions in heart and lung doses using deep inspiration breath hold with active breathing control and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients treated with locoregional breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55(2):392-406 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(02)04143-3
  20. Liu HH, Balter P, Tutt T, et al: Assessing Respiration-Induced Tumor Motion and Internal Target Volume Using Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography for Radiotherapy of Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68(2):531-540 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.066
  21. Yang Y, Ford E.C, Wu B, et al: An overlap-volume-histogram based method for rectal dose prediction and automated treatment planning in the external beam prostate radiotherapy following hydrogel injection. Med Phys 40(1):011709 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4769424
  22. Wu B, Ricchetti F, Sanguineti G, et al: Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(4):1241-1247 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.026
  23. Wu B, Pang D, Lei S, et al: Improved robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy plan quality and planning efficacy for organ-confined prostate cancer utilizing overlap-volume histogram-driven planning methodology. Radiother Oncol 112(2):221-226 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2014.07.009
  24. Petit S.F, Wu B, Kazhdan M, et al: Increased organ sparing using shape-based treatment plan optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiother Oncol 102(1):38-44 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.025