한국토양비료학회지 (Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer)

  • 제49권5호
  • /
  • Pages.572-576
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 0367-6315(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-2162(eISSN)
한국토양비료학회 (Korean Society of Soil Science and Fertilizer)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quality Assessment of the Soils Used for Urban Agriculture in Seoul and its Vicinity

  • Lim, Ga-Hee (Department of Environment Horticulture, University of Seoul) ;
  • Park, Sol-Yi (National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management Branch Institute, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jeon, Da-Som (Department of Environment Horticulture, University of Seoul) ;
  • Yoon, Jung-Hwan (Department of Environment Horticulture, University of Seoul) ;
  • Lee, Dan-Bi (Department of Environment Horticulture, University of Seoul) ;
  • Oh, Jun-Seok (Department of Environment Horticulture, University of Seoul) ;
  • Kim, Kye-Hoon (Department of Environment Horticulture, University of Seoul)
  • 투고 : 2016.10.21
  • 심사 : 2016.10.28
  • 발행 : 2016.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Soil quality assessment is an important tool for environmental management in an agricultural field. It can be used to evaluate the health of the soils and to establish the basis for sustainable urban agriculture and soil management. For this study, the chemical properties of the soils used for urban agriculture were examined. Results of the soil analysis for chemical properties were applied to soil quality assessment system, which is composed of principal component analysis, application to scoring function and derivation of soil quality index (SQI). Soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (T-N) were determined for minimum data set (MDS) according to principal component analysis. Based on the results of scoring for four indicators (pH, EC, OM, T-N), soil pH was the indicator that needs the most urgent management. Results of SQI derivation showed that many of the urban farms appeared to be insufficient score in comprehensive soil quality assessment. In conclusion, soil management practices based on scores derived from soil chemical indicators need to be carried out to maintain sustainable urban agricultural soil environment and to provide easy-to-understand information to urban farmers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Andrews, S.S., D.L. Karlen, and J.P. Mitchell. 2002. A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 90:25-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00174-8
  2. Bray, R.H. and L.T. Kurtz. 1945. Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 59(1):39-46. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006
  3. Ha, S.K., M.S. Kim, J.S. Ryu, G.L. Jo, S.C. Choi, Y.S. Kim, M.T. Choi, B.K. Ahn, H.W. Kim, C.Y. Kim, Y.H. Lee, and S.H. Yang. 2010. Monitoring of chemical properties for the upland soils in Korea. p. 357. In Abstracts, Korean Soc. Soil Sci. Fert., Suwon, KR.
  4. Hwang, J.I., Y.J. Yoon, B.G. Rhee, and S.Y. Lee. 2010. Segmentation and characteristic analysis of urban farmers behavior. Korean J. Community Living Sci. 21(4):619-631.
  5. Kang, K.N., J.K. Lee, K.H. Kim, and M.H. Lee. 2007. Revitalization planning of urban farming based on vegetable gardens. J. Inst. Const. Technol. 26:167-176.
  6. Kim, H.S., Y.N. Kim, J.W. Kim, and K.H. Kim. 2011. Properties and heavy metal contents of urban agricultural soils in Seoul. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 44(6):1048-1051. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2011.44.6.1048
  7. Na, Y.E. 2010. Driving projects of urban agriculture for the energy independence. Korean J. Environ. Agr. 29(3):304-308. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2010.29.3.304
  8. Nelson, D.W. and L.E. Sommers. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. p. 961-1010. In D.L. Sparks, A.L Page, P.A. Helmke, R.H. Loeppert, P.N. Soltanpour, M.A. Tabatabai, C.T. Johnston and M.E. Sumner (ed.). Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
  9. Park, T.H. and I.S. Lee. 2012. Effects of the urban farm program on the participants' sense of community. J. Korean Inst. Landscape Archit. 40(5):119-128. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.5.119
  10. Qi, Y., J.L. Darilek, B. Huang, Y. Zhao, W. Sun, and Z. Gu. 2009. Evaluating soil quality indices in an agricultural region of Jiangsu Province, China. Geoderma 149:325-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.12.015
  11. Rahmanipour, F., R. Marzaioli, H.A. Bahrami, Z. Fereidouni, and S.R. Bandarabadi. 2014. Assessment of soil quality indices in agricultural lands of Qazvin Province, Iran. Ecol. Indic. 40:19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.12.003
  12. Smith, J.L. and J.W. Doran. 1996. Measurement and use of pH and electrical conductivity for soil quality analysis. p. 169-185. In J.W. Doran, A.J. Jones (ed.). Methods for assessing soil quality. SSSA Special Publication No. 49, SSSA, Madison, WI.
  13. Sumner, M.E. and W.P. Miller. 1996. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. p. 1201-1230. In D.L. Sparks, A.L. Page, P.A. Helmke, R.H. Loeppert, P.N. Soltanpour, M.A. Tabatabai, C.T. Johnston and M.E. Sumner (ed.). Methods of soil analysis. Part 3.Chemical method. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
  14. Tiessen, H., E. Cuevas and P. Chacon. 1994. The role of organic matter in sustaining soil fertility. Nature 371:783-785. https://doi.org/10.1038/371783a0