DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prediction of Pollutant Emission Distribution for Quantitative Risk Assessment

정량적 위험성평가를 위한 배출 오염물질 분포 예측

  • Lee, Eui Ju (Department of Safety Engineering, Pukyong National University)
  • 이의주 (부경대학교 안전공학과)
  • Received : 2016.03.31
  • Accepted : 2016.07.01
  • Published : 2016.08.31

Abstract

The prediction of various emissions from coal combustion is an important subject of researchers and engineers because of environmental consideration. Therefore, the development of the models for predicting pollutants very fast has received much attention from international research community, especially in the field of safety assessment. In this work, response surface method was introduced as a design of experiment, and the database for RSM was set with the numerical simulation of a drop tube furnace (DTF) to predict the spatial distribution of pollutant concentrations as well as final ones. The distribution of carbon dioxide in DTF was assumed to have Boltzman function, and the resulted function with parameters of a high $R^2$ value facilitates predicting an accurate distribution of $CO_2$. However, CO distribution had a difference near peak concentration when Gaussian function was introduced to simulate the CO distribution. It might be mainly due to the anti-symmetry of the CO concentration in DTF, and hence Extreme function was used to permit the asymmetry. The application of Extreme function enhanced the regression accuracy of parameters and the prediction was in a fairly good agreement with the new experiments. These results promise the wide use of statistical models for the quantitative safety assessment.

Keywords

References

  1. E. J. Lee, "Assessment of Coal Combustion Safety of DTF using Response Surface Mothod", Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, Vol. 30, No.1, pp. 8-13, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2015.30.1.008
  2. A. Williams, M. Pourkashanian, J. M. Jones, "Combustion of Pulverised Coal and Biomass", Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 587-610, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1285(01)00004-1
  3. G. Box and K. Wilson, "On The Experimental Attainment of Optimum Condition," Journal of Royal Statical Society, Ser. B, Vol. 13, pp. 1-45, 1951.
  4. A. Rushdi, A. Sharma and R. Gupta, "An Experimental Study of the Effect of Coal Blending on Ash Deposition", Fuel, Vol. 83, pp. 495-506, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2003.08.013
  5. H. Namkung and L. H. Xu, "Study on Deposition Tendency of Coal Ash under Various Gasification Environments through DTF", Fuel, Vol. 117, pp. 1274-1280, 2013
  6. E. Korytnyi, R. Saveliev, M. Perelman, B. Chudnovsky and E. Bar-Ziv, "Computational Fluid Dynamic Simulations of Coal-fired Utility Boilers: An Engineering Tool", Fuel, Vol. 88, pp. 9-18, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2008.08.010
  7. N. Spitz, R. Saveliev, E. Korytni, M. Perelman, E. Bar-Ziv and B. Chudnovsky, "Prediction of Performance and Pollutant Emission form Pulverized-coal Utility Boilers" In: Electric Power: Generation, Transmission and Efficiency, Nova Science Publishers, Inc. ; 2007, p.121-170.
  8. R. H. Myers, D. C. Montgomery and C. M. Anderson-Cook, "Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments", 3rd Edition, ISBN: 978-0-470-17446-3, Wiley, 2008.
  9. Arend and N. Dominic, Choices (Version 4.0) [Computer Software], Champaign, IL: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Research Laboratory, (CERL Report No. CH7-22510), 1993.