References
- Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009;28:44-56. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.44
- Nedelcu RG, Persson AS. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1461-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.027
- Schaefer O, Decker M, Wittstock F, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro. J Dent 2014;42:677-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.016
- Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A, Makynen A. Recent advances in dental optics - Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Laser Eng 2014;54:203-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.017
- Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1759-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0864-4
- Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions-an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14:11-21.
- Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 2013;16:11-21.
- Ender A, Mehl A. In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int 2015;46:9-17.
- Patzelt SB, Vonau S, Stampf S, Att W. Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws. J Am Dent Assoc 2013;144:914-20. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0209
- Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1687-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y
- Papaspyridakos P, Gallucci GO, Chen CJ, Hanssen S, Naert I, Vandenberghe B. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:465-72.
- Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:186-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.010
- van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One 2012;7:e43312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043312
- Kim SR, Lee WS, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH. Digitization of dental alginate impression: Three-dimensional evaluation of point cloud. Dent Mater J 2015;34:835-40. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-313
- Atzeni E, Iuliano L, Minetola P, Salmi A. Proposal of an innovative benchmark for accuracy evaluation of dental crown manufacturing. Comput Biol Med 2012;42:548-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2012.01.009
- Paranhos LR, Lima CS, da Silva RH, Daruge Júnior E, Torres FC. Correlation between maxillary central incisor crown morphology and mandibular dental arch form in normal occlusion subjects. Braz Dent J 2012;23:149-53. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000200010
- Paranhos LR, Zaroni M, Carli JP, Okamoto R, Zogheib LV, Torres FC. Association between the facial type and morphology of the upper central incisor in normal occlusion subjects. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15:29-33. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1183
- Martin CB, Chalmers EV, McIntyre GT, Cochrane H, Mossey PA. Orthodontic scanners: what's available? J Orthod 2015;42:136-43. https://doi.org/10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000001
- Sannino G, Gloria F, Schiavetti R, Ottria L, Barlattani A. Dental Wings CAD/CAM system precision: an internal and marginal fit sperimental analisys. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2009;2:11-20.
- Mehl A, Ender A, Mormann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12:11-28.
- Kim SY, Kim MJ, Han JS, Yeo IS, Lim YJ, Kwon HB. Accuracy of dies captured by an intraoral digital impression system using parallel confocal imaging. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:161-3. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3014
- Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:121-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1
- An S, Kim S, Choi H, Lee JH, Moon HS. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1171-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.024
- Keul C, Stawarczyk B, Erdelt KJ, Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Guth JF. Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization-a laboratory study. Dent Mater 2014;30:400-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.006
- Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L, Kirsten A, Reich S. The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow-the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:2119-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0923-5
- Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC, Heymann HO. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:206-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00400.x
- Rupf S, Berger H, Buchter A, Harth V, Ong MF, Hannig M. Exposure of patient and dental staff to fine and ultrafine particles from scanning spray. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:823-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1300-8
Cited by
- Accuracy and Reliability of Intraoral Scanners: Are They the Better Option? vol.4, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-017-0145-z
- Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature vol.17, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x
- Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison vol.18, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0489-3
- Accuracy of Three Digitization Methods for the Dental Arch with Various Tooth Preparation Designs: An In Vitro Study pp.1059941X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12998
- study vol.10, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.388
- 다양한 CAD/CAM 방식으로 제작한 금속하부구조물 간의 변연 및 내면 적합도 비교 연구 vol.57, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.3.211
- Workflow description of additively manufactured clear silicone indexes for injected provisional restorations: A novel technique vol.31, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12464
- A Comparative Study of the Fitness and Trueness of a Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Fabricated Using Two Digital Workflows vol.9, pp.14, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9142778
- Precision of the virtual occlusal record vol.89, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2319/092018-684.1
- Using the surgical guide for impression-free digital bite registration in the edentulous maxilla—a technical note vol.5, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-019-0172-8
- Approach to the Design and Manufacturing of Prosthetic Dental Restorations According to the Rules of Industry 4.0 vol.9, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1520/mpc20200020
- An Experimental Strategy for Capturing the Margins of Prepared Single Teeth with an Intraoral Scanner: A Prospective Clinical Study on 30 Patients vol.17, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020392
- Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner vol.29, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13135
- Dentistry 4.0 Concept in the Design and Manufacturing of Prosthetic Dental Restorations vol.8, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8050525
- A comparison of the marginal gaps of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by two different intraoral scanners vol.65, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12748
- Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Lighting Conditions on the Mesh Quality of an Intraoral Scanner vol.29, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13205
- Assessment of Compatibility between Various Intraoral Scanners and 3D Printers through an Accuracy Analysis of 3D Printed Models vol.13, pp.19, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194419
- Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence vol.12, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.299
- Evaluation of the accuracy of three different intraoral scanners for endocrown digital impression: An in vitro study vol.58, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2020.58.4.282
- Influence of Preparation Type and Tooth Geometry on the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners vol.29, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13202
- In vitro analysis of intraoral digital impression of inlay preparation according to tooth location and cavity type vol.65, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_20_00169
- In-vitro evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated using digital scanning technologies vol.13, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.6.373
- Three‐Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions vol.30, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13264
- Effect of different arch widths on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners vol.13, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.4.205
- Influence of implant position on the accuracy of intraoral scanning in fully edentulous arches: A systematic review vol.126, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.008
- Trueness of intraoral scanners in digitizing specific locations at the margin and intaglio surfaces of intracoronal preparations vol.126, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.019
- Evaluating the Effect of Ambient and Scanning Lights on the Trueness of the Intraoral Scanner vol.30, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13341
- Pros and Cons of CAD/CAM Technology for Infection Prevention in Dental Settings during COVID-19 Outbreak vol.22, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010049