DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Systematic Review of Child Abuse Screening Instruments

아동학대 평가도구의 체계적 고찰

  • Received : 2016.08.12
  • Accepted : 2016.10.12
  • Published : 2016.10.31

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and to describe the characteristics of child abuse screening instruments. Methods: Articles regarding the development of a child abuse screening instrument were investigated using the systematic review method. A literature search using the keywords "child and abuse or maltreatment and instrument or screening tool" in English, and "child," "abuse," and "instrument" in Korean, was conducted of material published in PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, SCOPUS, ERIC, and RISS. Database and bibliographic searches, and quality appraisal using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool that included systemic reviews, yielded 17 records. Results: Key elementary child abuse screening instruments were developed for physical, psychiatric, affective and sexual and child neglect assessment. The instruments' target populations were children at home and in institutions. The reviewed instruments had the advantage of diagnosing past, concurrent, and indirectly, potential child abuse. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that child abuse screening instruments are available for screening and for assessment of abused children in various circumstances. This review of child abuse screening instruments offers evidence for the acceptable use of optimal psychometric tools for child abuse assessment and provides guidelines for child health nursing practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Moon SH, Kim JY, Hyun YN, Kim HY. Understanding Child Abuse. Gyeonggi-do: Yangseowon; 2010. p11-16.
  2. Koh KS, Ban JS. Promoting law reform to build early detection systems for child abuse. Lawyers Association Journal. 2016;65(6):312-320
  3. National Child Protection Agency. 2015 National Child Abuse Fact Sheet [Internet]. Seoul: National Child Protection Agency; 2016 [cited 2016 July, 16]. Available from: http://korea1391.org/new/bbs/board.php?bo_table=report&wr_id=9865.
  4. Gilbert R, Widom CS, Browne K, Fergusson D, Webb E, Janson S. Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet.2009;373(9657):68-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61706-7
  5. Palazzi S, de Girolamo G, Liverani T. Observational study of suspected maltreatment in Italian paediatric emergency departments. Arch Dis Child.2005;90:406-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2003.040790.
  6. Gonzalez-Izquierdo A, Woodman J, Copley L, van der Meulen J, Brandon M, Hodes D, et al. Variation in recording of child maltreatment in administrative records of hospital admissions for injury in England, 1997-2009. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95(11):918-925. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2009.180216
  7. Benger JR, Pearce V. Simple intervention to improve detection of child abuse in emergency departments. BMJ.2002;324(7340):780. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7340.780
  8. Chang DC, Knight V, Ziegfeld S, Haider A, Warfield D, Paidas C. The tip of the iceberg for child abuse: the roles of the pediatric trauma service and its registry. The Journal of Trauma. 2004;57(6):1189-1198. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000145076.05111.E1
  9. Louwers EC, Korfage IJ, Affourtit MJ, Ruige M, Van den Elzen AP, de Koning HJ et al. Accuracy of a instrument to identify potential child abuse in departments. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2014;38(7):1275-1281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.11.005.
  10. Ministry of Health & Welfare, National Child Protection Agency. 2014 National Child abuse Report. Seoul: Ministry of Health & Welfare, National Child Protection Agency, 2015; July. Report No.:11-135200025-10
  11. National Emergency Medical Center. 2014 Yearbook of emergency medical statistics[Internet]. Seoul: National Emergency Medical Center; 2015 [cited 2016 July, 16]. http://www.e-gen.or.kr/nemc/statistics_ annual_report.do.
  12. Jung JH, Kwak YH. Review of the screening tool for child abuse by health care provider. Pediatric Emergency Medicine Journal. 2015; 2(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.22470/pemj.2015.2.1.1
  13. Moon SH, Jung YS. Development of the child abuse investment scale. The Social Welfare Research Review. 2003;12:43-76.
  14. Kim SK. Scale of child abuse assessment study. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. 2003:1-44.
  15. Woodman J, Lecky F, Hodes D, Pitt M, Taylor B, Gilbert R. Screening injured children for physical abuse or neglect in emergency departments: a systematic review. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;36:153-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01025.x.
  16. Louwers EC, Affourtit MJ, Moll HA, de Koning HJ, Korfage IJ. Screening for child abuse at emergency departments: a systematic review. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2010; 95:214-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ adc.2008.151654
  17. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PMM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2003;3(25):1-13. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1471-2288-3- 25
  18. Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB et al. QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2011;155:529-536. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
  19. Milner JS, Gold RG, Wimberley RC. Prediction and explanation of child abuse: cross-validation of the child abuse potential inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1986;54(6):865-866. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.54.6.865
  20. Lee SH. Validation of a scale for screening the abuse in early childhood. Child studies. 1993;2:69-77.
  21. Jang HJ, Lee JY. The development of a child abuse assessment scale. Journal of Korean Council for Children & Rights. 1999;3(1):77-96.
  22. Flowers AL, Hastings TL, Kelley ML. Development of a screening instrument for exposure to violence in children: The KID-SAVE. Journal of Psychopathology & Behavioral Assessment. 2000;22(1):91-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007580616096.
  23. Han IY, Park MS, Park HW, Yoo SK, Lee YW. Development of a physical abuse assessment scale for children. Journal of the Korean Society of Child Welfare. 2006;21:7-27.
  24. Zolotor AJ, Runyan DK, Dunne MP, Jain D, Peturs HR, Ramirez C, et al. ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool Children's Version (ICASTC): Instrument development and multi-national pilot testing. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2009;33(11):833-841. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.chiabu.2009.09.004
  25. Anderst J, Dowd MD, Schnitzer P, Tryon T. Preliminary development of a rapid assessment of supervision scale for young children. Pediatrics. 2012;129(6):1517-1524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2100-2880.
  26. Ondersma SJ, Chaffin MJ, Mullins SM, LeBreton JM. A brief form of the child abuse potential inventory: Development and validation. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. 2005;34(2):301-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3402_9.
  27. Park JD, Gwak YH, Kim EJ, Kim JS, Ruw JM, Bae JK, et al. Development of child and elder abuse screening tool for healthcare provider. Seoul: Korean Society of Pediatric Emegency, 2014 December.
  28. Bernstein DP, Fink L, Handelsman L, Foote J, Lovejoy M., Wenzel K, et al. Initial reliability and validity of a new retrospective measure of child abuse and neglect. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1994;151(8): 1132-1136. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.151.8.1132
  29. Runyan DK, Dunne MP, Zolotor AJ, Madrid B, Jain D, Gerbaka B, et al. The development and piloting of the ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool-Parent Version (ICAST-P). Child Abuse and Neglect. 2009; 33:826-832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.09.006.

Cited by

  1. 한국어판 아동학대 잠재성 도구의 신뢰도와 타당도 검증 vol.25, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2019.25.2.85
  2. A Systematic Review Evaluating Psychometric Properties of Parent or Caregiver Report Instruments on Child Maltreatment: Part 2: Internal Consistency, Reliability, Measurement Error, Structural Validit vol.22, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020915591