한국지반공학회논문집 (Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society)

한국지반공학회 (Korean Geotechnical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

소형콘의 관입저항력을 이용한 점토의 액성한계측정에 관한 연구

Study on the Measurement of Liquid Limit Using a Penetration Resistance of Small Cone in Clay Soil

  • 손무락 (대구대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 이재용 (대구대학교 토목공학과)
  • Son, Moorak (Dept. of Geotechnical Engrg., Daegu Univ.) ;
  • Lee, Jaeyong (Dept. of Geotechnical Engrg., Daegu Univ.)
  • 투고 : 2016.03.15
  • 심사 : 2016.09.19
  • 발행 : 2016.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 소형콘의 관입저항력을 이용한 점토의 액성한계를 측정하기 위하여 카올리나이트 점토와 벤토나이트 점토의 비율을 다양하게 혼합한 점토흙에 대하여 함수비와 소형콘의 관입저항력을 조사하고 기존의 동적(Casagrande 시험법) 및 정적(Fall cone 시험법) 액성한계 시험결과와 직접 비교하였다. 비교결과 다양한 점토흙의 함수비에 따른 관입저항력 관계곡선에서 변곡점이 형성된다는 것을 파악하였으며 이 때의 함수비가 정적액성한계(Fall cone)시험법에 의한 액성한계 값과 매우 유사함을 파악하였다. 변곡점이 형성된 점에서의 소형콘의 관입저항력은 약 0.2kPa로 나타났으며 이 때 의 함수비가 점토흙의 액성한계를 나타낸다는 것을 확인하였다. 이와 같은 연구결과를 토대로 향후 점토의 액성한계를 파악하는데 본 연구에서 조사된 0.2kPa의 소형콘의 관입저항력이 유용한 지표가 될 수 있다는 사실을 파악하였다. 또한 소형콘의 관입저항력을 이용한 액성한계 시험법을 제시하였다.

This study investigated both water content and penetration resistance of small cone of various clay soils that were made of Kaolinite and Bentonite with different mixing ratios and compared the results with those of the existing dynamic (Casagrande test) and static (fall cone test) tests directly. The comparison showed that the water content at the inflection point on a curve of water content and penetration resistance was very similar to the liquid limit from a fall cone test. The penetration resistance of small cone at the inflection point was 0.2 kPa, and it was ascertained that the water content at the inflection point represents a liquid limit of clay soils. From the study results, it was found that the penetration resistance of 0.2 kPa with the small cone can be an indicator of the liquid limit of clay soils in practice. Finally a test procedure to measure the liquid limit of clay soil based on a penetration resistance of small cone was proposed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Budhu, M. (1985), "The Effect of Clay Content on Liquid Limit from a Fall Cone and the British Cup Device", ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol.8, No.2, pp.91-95. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10515J
  2. Choi, Y.G. (2001), "A Study on the Estimation of Clay Soil Parameters Using Fall Cone Test", Pusan university master's thesis.
  3. Federico, A. (1983), "Relationships (Cu-w) and (Cu-s) for Remolded Clayey Soils at High Water Content", Riv. Ital. Geological, Vol.14, No.1, pp.38-41.
  4. Houlsby, G. T. (1982), "Theoretical Analysis of the Fall Cone Test", Geotechnique, Vol.32, No.2, pp.111-118. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1982.32.2.111
  5. Jang, J.W., Park, C.S., and Chung, Y.I. (2005), "A Comparative Study on Liquid Limit Value by Liquid Limit Tests", Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers, Vol.17, No.2, pp.375-382.
  6. Koester, J.P. (1992), "The Influence of Test Procedure on Correlation of Atterberg Limit with Liquefaction in Fine Grained Soils", American Society for Testing and Materials, pp.352-361.
  7. Kang, S.J., Park, Y.M., and Hur, S.M., and Kim, J.S. (2000), "Experimental study on the Atterberg limit changes due to experiment condition", Journal of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.2000, No.2, 2000. pp.451-454.
  8. Karlsson, R. (1961), "Suggested Improvements in the Liquid Limit Test with Reference to Flow Properties of Remoulded Clays", Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Paris, France. pp.171-184.
  9. Kim, S.C., Choi, I.G., and Park, Y.M. (1996), "Engineering Properties of Samcheok Organics Soils", Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol.12, No.1, pp.21-33.
  10. Kim, S.C., Yu, N.J., and Lee, S.D. (2000), "Relation between the Liquid Limit by Casagrande's Method and Fall Cone Test", Journal of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.2000, No.2, pp.233-236.
  11. Korea Standard Association (2000), KS F 2303, Test method for liquid limit and plastic limit of soils.
  12. Lee, L.T. and Freeman, R. B. (2007), "An Alternative Test Method for Assessing Consistency Limits", ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol.30, No.4, pp.1-8.
  13. Leroueil, S. and Le Bihan, J. P. (1996), "Liquid Limits and Fall Cones", Canadian Geotechnical. Journal, Vol.33. pp.793-798. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-104-324
  14. Moon, C. F. and White, K. B. (1985), "A Comparison of Liquid Limit Test Result", Geotechnique, Vol.35, No.1, pp.59-60. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.1.59
  15. Norman, L. E. J. (1958), "A Comparison of Values of Liquid Limit Determined with Apparatus Having bases of Different Hardness", Geotechnique, Vol.8, pp.79-83. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1958.8.2.79
  16. Park, S.S. and Nong, Z. (2013), "A Proposal of Flow Limit for Soils at Zero Undrained Shear Strength", Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol.29, No.11, pp.73-84. https://doi.org/10.7843/kgs.2013.29.11.73
  17. Son, Y.H., Chang, P.W., and Won, J.Y., Kim, S.P. (2003), "Estimation of Liquid Limit by a Single-point Method of Fall Cone Test", Journal of Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers, Vol.17, No.2, pp.80-85.
  18. Sowers, G.F., Vesic, A., and Grandndolfi, M. (1959), "Penetration Test for Liquid Limit", ASTM, STP, No. 254, 216-226.
  19. Sharma, B. and Bora, P. K. (2003), "Plastic Limit, Liquid Limit and Undrainded Shear Strength of Soil - Reappraisal", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol.129, No.8, pp.774-777. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:8(774)
  20. Sherwood, P.T. and Riley, M.D. (1970), "An Investigation of Cone-penetrometer Method for Liquid Limit", Geotechnique, Vol.20, pp.203-208. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1970.20.2.203
  21. Vasilev, A. M. (1949), "Basic Principles of the Methods and Techniques of Laboratory Determination of Physical Soil Properties", Moscow.
  22. Wood, D. M. (1985), "Some Fall-cone Tests", Geotechnique, Vol. 35, No.1, pp.64-68. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.1.64

피인용 문헌

  1. Development of Wearable Device for Field Condition Evaluation of Clay Surface Layer vol.18, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.6.243