Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지)

Korean Society of Computer Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on efficient financial income elderly long-term care facilities size

  • Jeong, Seong-Bae (Dept. of Public Administration & Social Welfare, Chosun University)
  • Received : 2016.09.05
  • Accepted : 2016.09.20
  • Published : 2016.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aims of this study are to contribute to efficient revenue management by analysis of the scale in elderly long-term care facilities. The data was used for input of the elderly long-term care costs Scale, and calculated the staffing standards and social welfare facilities workers with living wage guidelines in the Department of Health and Human Services. Revenue efficiency is the highest order of size are as follows. I8(98 people) \43,517,010, H6(86 people) \36,568,332, G8(78 people) \29,426,532, F8(68 people) \23,227,532, E8(58 people) \19,701,254, D8(48 people) \19,155,187, C6( 36) \14,389,109, B8(28 people) \9,920,031, A8(18 people) \3,721,031. It seems that its revenue efficiency even higher than the larger the scale. Meanwhile, The researchers focused on C6 (36 patients) model. Suggestion of this study are following; First, the arrangement can be provided based on needs of the elderly care facility staffing standards. Secondly, an elderly care facility selected wage guidelines. Thirdly, the elderly efficiency guidelines established by the size of a nursing facility. This study and other financial income factor are not the applicable limits.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim,-Jin Soo, An Efficiency Analysis of the Long-term Care Facilities Using DEA Model. Graduate School of Christian Studies. Baekseok University, 2010.
  2. Kwon-TaeYeop , A Study on the Efficiency of the Long-term Care Facilities: Focused on DEA-Tier Analysis, Graduate School of Cheongju University, 2015.
  3. Moon-Sangho.Kim-YoonSu, A Research on Efficiency and Equity of Services from Elder-Care Centers: DEA Efficiency Score and Coulter"s Index of Inequity, policy studies review, Vol. 16, No. 3, September, 2006.
  4. Seong-Bae Jeong, An Efficiency Analysis of the Long-term Care Facilities Using DEA Model, journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, Vol. 20, No. 6, June, 2015.
  5. Sinc-hanghwan.bae-seongho, Basic research analyzes the number of long-term care facilities, 6 May 08, 2016 Source Forum, 2016
  6. Jeon-Hee Jeong, A study on efficiency evaluation and influence factors of the long-term care facility, Graduate School of Social Welfare Yonsei University, 2013.
  7. Jeon-Hee Jeong, A Study on Efficiency Evaluation Using DEA and Influence Factors on Efficiency of the Long-Term Care Facility, Korean journal of social welfare studies, Vol. 44, No. 4, December, 2013.
  8. HRD Glossary, 2010. 9. 6.
  9. Health and Social Affairs (2016) 'research and development planning future health policy development challenges'
  10. Korea Accounting institute, Social welfare and the social welfare centers Financial Accounting Transparency. Efficiency Improvement, 2015.
  11. Korean language dictionary, 2015.
  12. Long Term Care Insurance statistics annual report, 2016.
  13. National Statistical Office, 2015 elderly Chart, 2015.
  14. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Notice of such long-term care benefit provided based on salary and cost estimation method (effective 2016. 7. 1), 2016.
  15. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Elderly Health, Welfare and Business Information, 2016
  16. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Facility staffing standards and standards of the elderly medical welfare facilities, 2016
  17. Ministry of Strategy and Finance, also promote efficient spending nursing facilities, 2016.
  18. National Statistical Office, Social Indicators in Korea, 2015.
  19. National Health Insurance Corporation, Long - Term Care Insurance Statistics Yearbook, 2016.
  20. Ministry of Health and Welfare, 2015 Status of Elderly Welfare Facilities, 2016.
  21. News Welfare, You can change pricing, 2016. 6. 16.
  22. Times welfare, welfare QC activities competitive with welfare facilities, 2007. 2. 26.