Relationships between Peer- and Self-Evaluation in Team Based Learning Class for Engineering Students

공과대학생의 팀 기반 수업에서 동료평가와 자기평가의 관계

  • Hwang, Soonhee (Office for Education Accreditation, Pusan National University)
  • 황순희 (부산대학교 교육인증원)
  • Received : 2016.07.27
  • Accepted : 2016.08.30
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

This paper aims to apply two ways of student evaluation, i.e. peer- and self-evaluation to TBL(team based learning) class and to explore the difference between two evaluations by gender and grade as well as their relationships, and finally to provide an explanation for the improvement of evaluation ways in TBL class. There has been much research about TBL and its related factors. However, according to the examination of both domestic and overseas researches concerning the application of peer- and self-evaluation to TBL class, few studies have focused on them in terms of the engineering curriculum. This study was conducted with 251 engineering students at P University, and peer- and self-evaluation in TBL class have been measured. Our findings show that firstly, there were significant grade differences in self-evaluation of engineering students. Second, there were no significant gender and grade differences in peer-evaluation. Third, we found a significant correlation between the two factors, self- and peer-evaluation. Also there was a significant correlation among variables of subcategories. Based on these findings, it is expected to provide an explanation for the application of peer- and self-evaluation in TBL class and will be useful for the improvement plans of the related courses in engineering school.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. 강경희(2009). 발표 활동에서 예비 과학교사들의 동료평가에 관한 결과와 인식 분석, 교원교육, 25(3), 261-275.
  2. 강인애.정은실(2010). 팀 구성 방식에 따른 학습활동 만족도: 질적 자료 분석에 의한 사례연구, 교육방법연구, 22(3), 67-95.
  3. 강정은(2010). 동료평가를 이용한 개인 기여도 평가에 관한 연구, 석사학위논문, 건국대학교 산업공학과.
  4. 김수진.강희경(2013). 문제중심학습에서 평가주체에 따른 평가: 튜터평가, 동료평가, 자기평가를 중심으로, 한국산학기술학회논문지, 14(8), 3732-3738. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.8.3732
  5. 변영계.김광휘(1999). 협동학습의 이론과 실제, 서울: 학지사.
  6. 오수학.김세진.변재훈(2001). 수행평가에서 동성 및 이성동료 평가 간 차이, 한국체육측정평가학회지, 3(1), 73-79.
  7. 이경미(2010). 쓰기과업에서 동료평가가 자기평가에 미치는 영향: 교육대학원생을 중심으로, 석사학위논문, 중앙대학교 교육대학원.
  8. 이동주(2013). 온라인 협동학습 환경에서 동료평가의 역할: 평가자 및 피평가자 경험을 통한 개별 책무성 강화, 평생학습사회, 9(2), 181-211.
  9. 이영민(2006). 웹 기반 학습환경에서 성격유형에 의한 팀 구성방식이 팀 과제수행력, 팀워크, 상호작용에 미치는 영향, 교육공학연구, 22(3), 1-21.
  10. 전성연 외(2007). 협동학습 모형 탐색, 서울: 학지사.
  11. 전영욱.김진모(2009). 팀 학습에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 구조분석, Andragogy Today: International Journal of Adult & Continuing Education, 12 (4), 115-146.
  12. 정은이(2009). 문제해결 토의 활동이 대학생의 창의성에 미치는 효과, 아시아교육연구, 10(2), 27-49.
  13. 조성균.김종경.이재돈(2010). 대학체육 발표수업에서의 동료 평가 활용사례 연구, 한국체육교육학회지, 15(2), 211-223.
  14. 채수진(2006). 의과대학 문제중심학습에서 학생평가방법의 일관성 검토 - 튜터평가, 동료평가, 자기평가를 중심으로: 의과대학 문제중심학습에서 학생평가방법의 일관성 검토, 열린교육연구, 14(1), 331-349.
  15. 황순희(2014). 팀 기반 스피치 수업의 교육적 효과 분석- 창의성 함양을 위한 교육 사례를 중심으로, 교양교육연구, 8(3), 287-322.
  16. Bean, J.C.(1996). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  17. Boud, D. & Falchikov, N.(1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher education, 18 (5), 529-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138746
  18. Burchfield, C.M. & Sappington, J.(1999). Participation in Classroom Discussion. Teaching of Psychology, 26 (4), 290-291.
  19. Cheng, W. & Warren, M.(1997). Having second thoughts: student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education, 22 (2), 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079712331381064
  20. Conway, R. et al.(1993). Peer assessment of an individual's contribution to a group project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18 (1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180104
  21. Dingel, M.J. et al.(2013). Cooperative learning and peer evaluation: The effect of free riders on team performance and the relationship between course performance and peer Evaluation. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13 (1), 45-56.
  22. Dochy, F.J.R.C., Segers, M. & Sluijsmans, D.(1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher education, 24 (3), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379935
  23. Dommeyer, C.J.(2007). Using the diary method to deal with social loafers on the group project: Its effects on peer evaluations, group behavior, and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Education, 29 (2), 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475307302019
  24. Fellenz, M.R.(2006). Toward fairness in assessing student groupwork: A protocol for peer evaluation of individual contributions. Journal of Management Education, 30 (4), 570-591. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562906286713
  25. Gopinath, C.(1999). Alternatives to instructor assessment of class participation. Journal of Education for Business, 75 (1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832329909598983
  26. Gueldenzoph, L.E. & May, G.L.(2002). Collaborative peer evaluation: Best practices for group member assessments. Business Communication Quarterly, 65 (1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/108056990206500102
  27. Harskamp, E. et al.(2008). Group composition and its effect on female and male problem-solving in science education. Educational Research, 50 (4), 307-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802499688
  28. Herbert, N.(2012). Peer assessment: is it fair?. Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education, (formerly UniServe Science Conference).
  29. Johnson, D.W. et al.(2006). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom, Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
  30. Keith, J.T.(2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48 (1), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
  31. Kennedy, G.J.(2005). Peer-assessment in group projects: is it worth it?. Proceedings of the 7th Australasian conference on Computing education, Vol. 42. Australian Computer Society, Inc.
  32. KitFaiPun, Y. et al.(2003). Teaching new product development in universities: an action learning approach. European Journal of Engineering Education, 28 (3), 339-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0304379031000106418
  33. Kilpatrick, D.J. et al.(2001). Procedural justice and the development and use of peer evaluations in business and accounting classes. Journal of Accounting Education, 19 (3), 225-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0748-5751(01)00021-5
  34. Marjo, V.Z. et al.(2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20 (4), 270-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
  35. May, G.L. & Gueldenzoph, L.E.(2006). The effect of social style on peer evaluation ratings in project teams. Journal of Business Communication, 43 (1), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943605282368
  36. McCroskey, J.C.(1993). An introduction to rhetorical communication (6th ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  37. McCroskey, J.C. & McCroskey, L.L.(1988). Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 5, 108-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824098809359810
  38. Parsons, D.(2004). Justice in the classroom: Peer assessment of contributions in group projects. Proceedings of the 17th NACCQ, Christchurch, 145-152.
  39. Raban, R. & Litchfield, A.(2007). Supporting peer assessment of individual contributions in groupwork. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23 (1), 34.
  40. Resta, P.(2005). Development and validation of a Web-based tool for individual and group accountability. Proceedings of American Educational Research Association 2005, San Francisco, USA.
  41. Resta, P. & Laferrière, T.(2007). Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7
  42. Ryan, G.J. et al.(2007). Peer, professor and self-evaluation of class participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8 (1), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787407074049
  43. Slavin, R.E.(1991). Synthesis of Research of Cooperative Learning. Educational leadership, 48 (5), 71-82.
  44. Smith, K.A.(1996). Cooperative learning: Making "group work" work. In Sutherland, T.E. & Bonwell, C. C.(Eds.), Using active learning in college classes: A range of options for faculty (pp. 71-82), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  45. Stapleton, J.L.(2007). Effects of team composition on problem solving: an empirical investigation of the assembly effect. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 49 (2), 94-108.
  46. Topping, K.(1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of educational Research, 68 (3), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249