한국조리학회지 (Culinary science and hospitality research)

  • 제22권4호
  • /
  • Pages.114-127
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2466-0752(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-1023(eISSN)
한국조리학회 (Culinary Society of Korean Academy)
권호 표지

소셜커머스 외식상품 재이용의도의 영향요인 - 지각된 위험과 가격의식성을 중심으로 -

Factors Influencing the Reuse Intention of Social Commerce Foodservice Product - Perceived Risk and Price Consciousness -

  • 전현모 (동국대학교 경주캠퍼스 호텔관광경영학부) ;
  • 권나경 (선문대학교 국제레저관광학과)
  • Jeon, Hyeon-Mo (Dept. of Hotel & Tourism Management, Dongguk University-Gyeongju) ;
  • Kwon, Na-Kyung (Dept. of Global Leisure & Tourism, Sun Moon University)
  • 투고 : 2016.03.20
  • 심사 : 2016.06.11
  • 발행 : 2016.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 소셜커머스를 이용하는 외식소비자들을 대상으로 재이용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인으로 지각된 위험과 상품구매 시 가격을 고려하는 정도인 가격의식성을 제시하여 영향관계를 검증해 보고자 한다. 이러한 검증결과를 통해 외식소비자들의 소셜커머스에 대한 행동의도를 파악하여 외식소셜커머스 관련 업체들의 마케팅전략 수립 시 활용할 수 있는 유용한 실무적 시사점을 제공하는데 본 연구의 목적을 두고자 한다. 연구의 공간적 범위와 조사대상은 소셜커머스에서 외식상품을 구매한 경험이 있는 전국의 20세 이상 남녀 내국인 거주자로 하였으며, 표본추출을 위한 소셜커머스 업체는 연간 방문자 수 기준으로 2014년 쇼핑 앱 순위에서 1위를 차지한 쿠팡으로 선정하였다. 조사대상자 중에서 쿠팡을 이용해 외식상품을 구매한 경험이 있는 지를 사전질문을 통해 파악한 후 경험이 있다고 응답한 사람을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 연구결과, 정보위험과 개인보안위험, 심리적 위험, 시간손실위험은 재이용의도에 부정적인 영향이 있는 것으로 나타났으나 사회적 위험과 재무적 위험은 아무런 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 가격의식성은 재이용의도에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 외식소비자들의 지속적인 소셜커머스 이용에 영향을 미치는 요인으로 지각된 위험과 가격의식성의 중요성을 규명하였다.

The study, focused on social commerce food service consumers, attempted to test the relationship between perceived risk and price consciousness, and suggested that perceived risk and price consciousness, the the degree to which price is considered when purchasing goods, affect reuse intention. Through such test results, the study aimed to provide useful practical implications for establishing marketing strategies of companies related to food service social commerce, and those looking into behavioral intentions of social commerce using food service consumers. The subjects of the study were male and female residents of Korea over 2-years of age who have had some experience purchasing a dining out item through social commerce. The social commerce company selected for sampling was Coupang, which was the number 1 shopping App in 2014 based on the number of yearly visitors. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted on respondents who had indicated that they had experience purchasing foodservice goods through Coupang. The results revealed that source risk, privacy risk, psychological risk, and time-loss risk had negative influences on reuse intention. However, social risk and financial risk did not exhibit any influences. Price consciousness had positive influences on reuse intention. The study explored perceived risk and price consciousness as elements to affect continuous use of social commerce of foodservice consumers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alford BL, Biswas A (2002). The effects of discount level, price consciousness and sale proneness on consumer's price perception and behavioral intention. Journal of Business Research 55(9):775-783. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00214-9
  2. Corbitt BJ, Thanasankit T, Yi H (2003). Trust and e-commerce: A study of consumer perceptions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2(3):203-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-4223(03)00024-3
  3. Choi SY, Cho MS (2014). A study on the effect of expectacy disconformation of social commerce food service product purchase on satisfaction and repurchase intention. Journal of Foodservice Management Society of Korea 17(6):29-46.
  4. Chu SW, Lee MJ (2015). Effects of social commerce users' perceived risk and involvement on their satisfaction, reuse intention and wordof-mouth intention: Focusing on beauty service consumers. Journal of Invest Cosmetol 11(3):269-275. https://doi.org/10.15810/jic.2015.11.3.011
  5. Crespo AH, Bosque IR, Sanchez MMGS (2009). The influence of perceived risk on internet shopping behavior: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Risk Research 12(2):259-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870802497744
  6. Dickson PR, Sawyer AG (1990). The price knowledge and search of supermarket shoppers. Journal of Marketing 54(3):42-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251815
  7. Erdem T, Mayhew G, Sun B (2001). Understanding reference-price shoppers: A within-and cross-category analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 38(4):445-457. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.4.445.18909
  8. Featherman MS, Pavlou PA (2003). Predicting eservices adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59(4):451-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3
  9. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1985). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading. MA: Addison Wesley Pub. Co.
  10. Forsythe SM, Shi B (2003). Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping. Journal of Business Research 56(11):867-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00273-9
  11. Hassan AM, MB Kunz, AW Pearson, FA Mohamed (2006). Conceptualization and measurement of perceived risk in online shopping. Marketing Management Journal 16(1):138-148.
  12. Jarvenpaa S, Todd PA (1997). Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the world wide web. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 1(2):59-88.
  13. Jeon HM (2013). The effect of foodservice consumer's perceived risk and value on social commerce usage intention: Focused on the technology acceptance model. Journal of Foodservice Management Society of Korea 16(6):199-222.
  14. Jeon HM, Park JH (2015). Influences of perceived value about foodservice social commerce on perceived usefulness and behavioral intention: Moderating effect of collectivism. Journal of Foodservice Management Social of Korea 18(30):83-104.
  15. Jung NH, Song HK (2015). The effect of a restaurant customer's technology readiness on purchase intention in social commerce web-based activity: The mediating role of shopping value. Korean Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 24(3):137-156.
  16. Kang SA, Lee EY (2012). The influence of social commerce coupon & coupon expiration on perceived value, satisfaction and re-visit intention. Korean Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 21(5):155-174.
  17. Kim DT (2013). The effect of SNS attitude and perceived risk on the social commerce information diffusion. Journal of the Aviation Management Society of Korea 11(2):85-101.
  18. Kim HC, Choi YE, Lee SH (2015). The effects of foodservice consumers' utilitarian and affective motivations on social commerce purchase intention: Focus on the role of consumers' interactivity. Journal of Consumption Culture 18(2):237-257. https://doi.org/10.17053/jcc.2015.18.2.011
  19. Kim SH, Park HS (2013). An empirical study on individual and social commerce factors impacting shopping value and intention to repurchase in social commerce and moderating effects of perceived security. Journal of Information Technology Services 12(2):31-53.
  20. Kim YJ, Kim DJ (2015). A study on the structural relationships among foodservice consumer's perceived social commerce characteristics, trust, customer satisfaction and repurchase intention. FoodService Industry Journal 11(1):45-59. https://doi.org/10.22509/kfsa.2015.11.1.004
  21. Kwon KJ (2015). The influence of perceived risks of social commerce on consumer trust(website trust and coupon provider trust) and behavioral intentions. Journal of Foodservice Management Society of Korea 18(5):203-224.
  22. Kwon NK, Choi YJ (2014). The relationships among coffeehouse's physical environment, selfcongruity, positive emotion, and revisit intentions. Journal of Culinary Research 20(5):111-118.
  23. Lee MC (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 8(3):130-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.006
  24. Lee KT, Noh MJ (2011). Factors influencing the usage intention of social commerce: The relationship between the technology acceptance model and the consumers' perceived risk. Journal of Consumption Culture 14(4):165-182. https://doi.org/10.17053/jcc.2011.14.4.009
  25. Lee KT, Noh MJ (2011). A study of factors influencing the use of social commerce: Focusing social norm and price consciousness. The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research 11(4):65-85.
  26. Lichtenstein DR, Bloch PH, Black WC (1988). Correlates of price acceptability. Journal of Marketing Research 15(September):243-252.
  27. Lichtenstein DR, Ridgway NM, Netemeyer RG (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: A field study. Journal of Marketing Research 30(2):234-245. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172830
  28. Lim YW, Yu HK (2010). The influence of eservicescape on selective attribution of the internet travel agency: A focus on the moderating effect of low price and large brand preference. Journal of Tourism Sciences 34(1):319-339.
  29. Lee SJ (2012). A study on determinants affecting the usage of social commerce. Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies 26(3):495-529.
  30. Na YS, Ahn DH, Cho SH (2012). The influence of social commerce of foodservice on buying motives: Moderating effects of daily deal service value. The Korean Journal of Culinary Research 18(1):141-155.
  31. McDougall GHG, Levesque T (2000). Customer satisfaction with services: Putting perceived value into equation. Journal of Service Marketing 14(4/5):392-410. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040010340937
  32. Rhee HJ, Shim ES (2013). Effects of perceived risks of social commerce on purchase intention: Moderating role of product types. The Academy of Customer Satisfaction Management 15(1):145-165.
  33. Sandra M, Forsythe, Bo Shi (2003). Consumer patronage and risk perception in internet shopping. Journal of Business Research 56(11):867-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00273-9
  34. Shin JK, Kong HK (2004). The study of the factors influencing on private brand proneness by consumer characteristics. The Journal of Management & Economics 22(1):159-178.
  35. Shim ES, Rhee HJ (2013). Influences of consumer perceived risks and valence of word of mouth information on purchase intention in social commerce. Journal of Information Technology Services 12(3):73-93.
  36. Sun ZJ (2014). Factors affecting on users' intention in using social commerce and online shopping. Journal of The Korea Contents Association 14(3):352-360. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.03.352
  37. Sung HJ, Ko JY (2012). The effect of the information quality characteristics on the satisfaction and the intention of continuous use: Based on ETAM(extended technology acceptance model). Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research 24(2):197-216.
  38. Yang K, Jolly LD (2009). The effects of consumer perceived value and subjective norm on mobile data service adoption between American and Korean consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 16(6):502-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2009.08.005
  39. 조선닷컴 앱피타이저 12월 20일 2014년. 랭키닷컴, '2014년 e-Commerce 분석보고서' 발표. 소셜커머스 3사 순위 석권 http://app.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2014/12/30/2014123001291.html