Journal of the Korean housing association (한국주거학회논문집)

The Korean Housing Association (한국주거학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study for the Reform of Public Housing Welfare Delivery System

주거복지 공적 전달체계 개편방안 연구 - 통합적 지역거점 구축방안을 중심으로 -

  • 이종권 (한국토지주택공사 토지주택연구원) ;
  • 김경미 (토지주택연구원)
  • Received : 2016.04.11
  • Accepted : 2016.07.18
  • Published : 2016.08.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In era of lowbirth, aging population, low growth and social polarization, the effective welfare delivery systems are taking on added significance than past years. Public housing welfare resources, such as public rental housing, housing voucher, affordable housing loan, are more diversified and expanded. These programs could work effectively by the comprehensive interlink and community based delivery system. From the standpoint of recipients, how effectively the substantial benefits of welfare resources being delivered to each individual is more important than how much welfare resources being produced totally. This study aimed to explore the reform of public housing welfare delivery system. For this purpose, diagnosed the current states and key issues related to public delivery system, and analyzed what kinds of housing welfare services should be strengthened, and finally suggested the collaboration among the public sectors (local government, LH, HUG, HF etc.) and the partnership with non-profit organizations. Main research implications are as follows. The main housing welfare services which could be categorized as the housing welfare center's role are advice & information offering, several public resources interlink and accessibility improvement, community based network construction, etc. And the most important key for successful delivery system reorganization is the collaborative operation of the public sectors and local government, non-profit organizations.

Keywords

References

  1. Audit Commission. (1998). Home alone the role of housing in community care. London: CW Print Group.
  2. Bennett, D. (2005). Scoping the supported housing sector: The funding and regulatory framework. In Mark Foord & Paul Simic (Eds.), Housing, community care and supported housing. Coventry: Chartered Institute of Housing.
  3. Choi, S. J., & Nam, K. M. (2006). Social welfare administration. Seoul: Nanam Publishing House.
  4. Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). The incomplete revolution: Adapting to women's new roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  5. Evers, A. (1993). The welfare mix approach. Understanding the pluralism of welfare system. In A. Evers & I. Svetlik (Eds.), Balancing pluralism: New welfare mixes in care for elderly. European centre Vienna: Avebury.
  6. Evers, A. (1995). Part of the welfare mix: The third sector as an intermediate area between market economy, State and Community. Voluntas, 6(2), 159-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353995
  7. Gilbert. N., & Specht, H. (2nd ed.) (1986). Dimensions of social welfare policy, Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  8. Gyoenggi Unlimited Care Center (2015). Guide of unlimited care center. Suwon: Gyoenggi-Do Government.
  9. Ham, Y. J. (2010). European social welfare delivery system: Regarding the public assistance. Seoul: Korean association for public administration.
  10. Hong, I. J. (2010). Evaluation and suggestions of social welfare service delivery system-focused on professionalism out of principle of composition. Health and Welfare Forum, 164, 57-69.
  11. Hong, I. O. (2015). The performances and toward directions of housing welfare center. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government.
  12. Hughes, O. (2010). Does governance exist? In S. P. Osborne (Eds.), The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance (pp. 87-104). London: Routledge.
  13. Hwang, J. I., Jeong., J. H., Kim, B. Y., & Lee, H. T. (2014). Restructuring of public welfare service delivery system and measures for collaborative operation of women and family welfare service delivery system. Sooul: Korean Womens's Development Institute.
  14. Jung, H. W., & Lee, Y. B. (2012). Restructure of public welfare delivery system in response to demographic changes. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
  15. Jin, M. Y., & Kim, J. J. (2014). A study on the public and private partnership for housing welfare provision. Daejeon: Land & Housing Institute.
  16. Kim, B. Y. (2013). A theoretical exploration of governance, as a paradigm for social welfare delivery. Social Welfare Policy, 40(3), 107-132. https://doi.org/10.15855/swp.2013.40.3.107
  17. Kim, H. S., Park, M. S., Chun, H. S., Cha, M. S., & Kim, T. H. (2012). A study on establishing a comprehensive housing support service system. Anyang: Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
  18. Kim, H. S. (2004). A study for reorganizing the housing programs and establishing the delivery system. Anyang: Korea research Institute for Human Settlements.
  19. Kim, S. M. (2015). The performances and development plan of Seoul housing related support center, The performances and toward directions of housing welfare center. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government.
  20. Kim, Y. D. (2008), Recent trends and alternatives of korean social welfare service policies-integration of market and anti-market schemes. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 36, 5-28.
  21. Kim, Y. M. (2008). Welfarization of the market: the main issues of marketization in social pension and health insurance. Social Welfare Policy, 34, 277-304.
  22. Kim, Y. M. (2014). The role allocation between state, family, market for social services, the diagnosis and seeking of korea social welfare paradigm. Proceedings of spring Annual Conference of Korea Association of Social Welfare Policy, Seoul, Korea.
  23. Koh, K. H., Kim, B. Y., & Gang, J. W. (2010). Welfare governance: Theoretical perspectives and tasks ahead. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
  24. Korea National Land and Housing Corporation (LH) (2014). The efficient performance system for comprehensive housing welfare services, Jinju: Author.
  25. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements & Korea Center for City and Environment Research (2014). Survey on the condition of housing welfare policy and delivery system. Anyang: Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
  26. Lee, C. S. (2008). Community residence welfare. Daegu: Hyungseul Publishing Networks.
  27. Lee, H. J., Park, S. Y., Yoo, E. J., & Yoo, J. Y. (2005). Comparative analysis of social welfare delivery system in foreign countries-With focus on public assistance delivery system. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
  28. Nam, K. C. (2010). Community-based services and housing welfare. The new paradigm of housing welfare, Housing Welfare Conference. Daejeon.
  29. Nam, W. S., Choi, E. H., & Cho, K. E. (2010). A study on designing providing system of community-based housing support services. Daejeon: Land & Housing Institute.
  30. National Assembly Budget Office (2013). The improvement of social welfare service delivery system. Seoul: Author.
  31. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (2004). What is supporting people? London: Author.
  32. Oh, Y. M., Park, N. W., & Weon, J. H. (2014). Goverment reforms and policy implications: Evaluating new public management. Seoul: Korea Institute of Public Finance.
  33. Park, J. H. (2015). Housing related support for vulnerable social group in UK, A delivery system for public housing services and the role of LH. Daejeon: Land & Housing Institute.
  34. Pestoff, V. A. (1998). Beyond the market and state: Social enterprises and civil democrary in a welfare society. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  35. Seo, J. G. (2009). A study on the introduction of housing-related services. Seoul: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.
  36. Sung, K. T., & Kwon, S. J. (1995). A study on the improvement of social welfare administration. The Korea Public Administration Journal, 4(2), 2074-2091.