DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Bond Performance for AC overlay on PCC Pavement

AC / PCC 복합포장 경계면 재료의 부착 성능 평가

  • 김동규 (중앙대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 황현식 (중앙대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • ;
  • 류성우 (한국도로공사 도로교통연구원) ;
  • 조윤호 (중앙대학교 공과대학 사회기반시스템공학부)
  • Received : 2016.03.25
  • Accepted : 2016.09.06
  • Published : 2016.10.17

Abstract

PURPOSES : This study focuses on the evaluation of interface performance with varying surface texture and tack coat application in an asphalt overlay. METHODS : The evaluation is carried out in two phases: tracking test and interface bond strength test. Using an image processing tool, tracking test is conducted to evaluate the susceptibility of the tack coat material to produce excessive tracking during application. Using the pull-off test method, the bond strength test is performed to determine the ability of the interface layer to resist failure. RESULTS : Results show that the underseal application yields less tracking compared to other applications. However, the bond strength is barely within the minimum acceptable value. On the other hand, RSC-4 produces higher bond strength for all surface types, but the drying time is long, which produces excessive tracking. CONCLUSIONS : While underseal application may be suitable for a trackless condition, the bond strength is less appealing compared to the rest of the tack applications available. RSC-4 demonstrated a high and consistent bond strength performance, but more time is required for drying to avoid excessive tracking. Tack coat application and surface type combination produce varying results. Therefore, these should be considered when selecting suitable future tack coat application options.

Keywords

References

  1. ASTM D 711, Standard Test Method for No Pick Up Time of Traffic Paint, 2015.
  2. Bryan Wilson, Tom Scullion, Abu Faruk, Evaluation of Design and Construction Issues of Thin HMA Overlays, 2015.
  3. Cho M. J., Investigation into bonding characteristics of Tack coat Materials for Asphalt Overlay on Concrete Pavement, 2013.
  4. Cindy K, Guidelines for the use of underseals as a pavement moisture barrier, 2006.
  5. Clark, Trackless Tack Coat Materials : A Laboratory Evaluation for Performance Acceptance, 2010.
  6. Eddie N. Johnson, Tack Coat Testing : Measuring Field Bond Strength, 2015.
  7. Insung, TF Coat (Tire Free Coat), 2014.
  8. JIS K 2208:2000, Asphalt Emulsion, 2006.
  9. KEC (Korea Expressway Corporation), Evaluation on Riding comfort of A Passenger with Various Surface Textures of Concrete Pavement in Tunnels, 2014.
  10. KS F 4932, Waterproofing membrane coating for concrete deck of bridge, 2015.
  11. Im J, Kim, Y.R, Yang, S., Bond Strength Evaluation of Asphalt Emulsions used in Asphalt Surface Treatments, 2014.
  12. MnDOT, Chip seal, Surface Treatments & Research Efforts, 2013.
  13. MOLIT (Ministy of Land, infrastructure and Transport), 가열아스팔트 혼합물 생산 및 시공 지침, 2014.
  14. NCHRP Report 712, Optimization of Tack Coat for HMA Placement, 2012.
  15. Seoul, 개질아스팔트 포장 시방서, 2011.
  16. Stephen T. Muench, De-bonding of Hot Mix Asphalt Pavements in Washington State, 2008.
  17. TTI, Design and Construction Guide for Surface Treatments over Base Courses, 2007.
  18. TTI, Design and Construction Guide for Surface Treatments over Base Courses, 2007.
  19. TTI, Seal Coat and Surface Treatment Manual, 2010
  20. WsDOT, Issues Related to Tack Coat, 2003.