A Meta-Analysis of Relationship between Perceived Value, Risk and Behavioral Intention on E-Commerce

전자상거래 연구에서 인지된 가치, 위험 및 행위의도 간의 관계에 대한 메타분석

  • Nam, Soo-tai (Division of Information and Electronic Commerce(Institute of Convergence and Creativity), Wonkwang University) ;
  • Jin, Chan-yong (Division of Information and Electronic Commerce(Institute of Convergence and Creativity), Wonkwang University)
  • Received : 2016.05.17
  • Accepted : 2016.08.10
  • Published : 2016.08.31

Abstract

Recently, the convergence of knowledge based society and information telecommunication technologies has a rapid impact on politics, economics and various fields. Meta-analysis is a statistical integration method that delivers an opportunity to overview the entire result of integrating and analyzing many quantitative research results. Meta-analysis, can see the direction and size of the relationship between variables using the concept of the effect size. The factor determining behavioral intention of consumer in e-commerce can say that critically dependent variable. In a predictive factor determining behavioral intention is typical that perceived value and perceived risk. We conducted a meta-analysis and review of between perceived value, perceived risk and behavioral intention on e-commerce researches. This study focused a total of 33 research papers that established causal relationships in between perceived value, risk and behavioral intention on e-commerce published in Korea academic journals during 2000 and 2016. The result of the meta-analysis might be summarized that the effect size in the path from the perceived value to the behavioral intention with the effect size (r = .526), listed an explanatory power of 28%. In addition, it showed that the effect size in the path from perceived risk to the behavioral intention with the effect size (r = -.220), listed a negative explanatory power of 5%. Based on these findings, several theoretical and practical implications were suggested and discussed with the difference from previous researches.

최근 정보통신기술과 지식정보화 사회의 융합은 정치, 경제, 문화 및 다양한 분야에 영향을 미치고 있다. 메타분석은 여러 실증연구의 정량적인 결과를 통합과 분석을 통해 전체 결과를 조망할 기회를 제공하는 통계적 통합 방법이다. 또한 메타분석은 효과크기라는 개념을 이용하여 변수들 간 상관관계의 방향과 크기를 알 수 있게 해준다. 전자상거래에서 고객의 행동을 결정하는 행위의도는 중요한 종속변수이다. 행위의도를 결정하는 선행변수에는 인지된 가치와 인지된 위험이 대표적으로 사용된다. 전자상거래 연구에서 인지된 가치, 인지된 위험과 행위의도 간의 관계에 관한 연구들을 문헌연구 및 메타분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구는 2000년부터 2016년까지 우리나라 학술지에 게재된 전자상거래 연구 중에서 인지된 가치, 인지된 위험 및 행위의도의 인과관계가 설정된 총 33편의 연구논문을 대상으로 하였다. 메타분석의 결과 인지된 가치와 행위의도 간 경로의 효과크기는 (r = .526)인 것으로 나타나 선행변수인 인지된 가치는 종속변수 행위의도를 약 28% 설명력을 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 인지된 위험과 행위의도 간 경로의 효과크기는 (r = -.220)인 것으로 나타나 선행변수인 인지된 위험은 종속변수 행위의도를 약 5% 부정적 설명력을 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 분석결과를 바탕으로 이론적 실무적 시사점을 제시하고 선행연구와 비교분석을 통해 차이점을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahan, U. S. & Choi, D. C.(2006). A Study on Relationship between Relational Benefits and Customer Loyalty in Online Shopping Mall: Focus on the Mediating Role of Customer Value, Trust, Switching Costs, Korea Journal of Business Administration, 19(4), 1461-1483.
  2. Bahli, B. & Benslimane, Y.(2004). An Exploration of Wireless Computing Risks, Information Management & Computer Security, 12(2), 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1108/09685220410542606
  3. Bauer, R. A.(1960). Comsumer Behavior as Risk Taking, in Hancock, R.(Ed), Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World Proceedings of 43rd Conference, American Marketing Association, Chicago, II, 389-389.
  4. Bolton, R. N. & James, H. D.(1991). A Multi-stage Model of Customers's Assessments of Service Quality and Value, Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4) 375-84. https://doi.org/10.1086/208564
  5. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T. & Rothstein, H. R.(2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis, West Sussex, UK; John Wiley and Sons.
  6. Brown, R. M.(2006). Drivers of Student Satisfaction and Student Loyalty in a Australian University Setting, Doctor of Philosophy Thesis.
  7. Chang, H. S., Zhao, P. C. & Park, K. O.(2010). Difference of Consumer Attitude based on Level of Product Information and Service Quality, Journal of information systems, 19(3), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2010.19.3.127
  8. Chang, M. H.(2005). Effects of Trust and Perceived Risk on Attitude and Purchase Intention in Internet Shopping Malls, Journal of information systems, 14(1), 227-249.
  9. Chang, W. K. & Lee, H. Y.(2004). A Study on the Effects of Social Variables on On-Line Trust in B2C Electronic Commerce, Korea Journal of Business Administration, 46(1), 2237-2261.
  10. Chen, Y., Kang, S. B. & Moon, T. S.(2015). The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, Influence of Perceived Value and Perceived Playfulness on Continuous Usage Intention of Smartphone Services in China, The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 15(5), 129-150.
  11. Chi, Y. S., Kang, M. Y., Han, K. S. & Choi, J. I.(2015). A Study on the Discontinuance Intention on O2O Commerce: With a Focus on the Mediating Effects of Perceived Risk and User Resistance, International Journal u- and e-Service, Science and Technology, 9(2), 207-218.
  12. Chung, K. S. & Kim, Y.(2004). An Empirical Study on Perceived Trust, Perceived Risk and Their Relationship in Internet Backing, Korean Business Education Review, 36(1), 65-86.
  13. Cohen, J.(1977). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences(Revised Edition), New York: Academic Press.
  14. Cox, D. F. & Rich, S. J.(1964). Perceived Risk and Consumer Decision Making: The Case of Telephone Shopping, Journal of Marketing Research, 1(4), 32-39.
  15. Duan, L. N., Jung, C. H. & Park, K. H.(2012). The Effects of Perceived Risk Affecting Perceived Value and Repurchase Intention in Electronic Commerce Environment, Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(3), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.3.013
  16. Glass, G. V.(1976). Primary, Secondary and Meta-analysis of Research, Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003
  17. Han, J. Y. & Moon, T. S.(2012). An Empirical Study on Perceived Value and Perceived Enjoyment of IPTV Service and Continuous Intention to Use, The Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 12(2), 125-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-012-9089-5
  18. Hedges, L. V., Konstantopoulos, S. & Thoreson A. C.(2003).Studies of Technology Implementation and Effects, Improving learning, New York: Teachers College, 187-204.
  19. Hyun, Y. S. & Kim, Y. J.(2013). Structural Relationships among SNS Users' Self-efficacy, Social Exchange Benefits, Perceived Value and User Loyalty, The Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13(3), 89-110.
  20. Kang, H. J.(2009). The Effect of Usability, Channel Preference, Perceived Value on Mobile Banking System Use, The Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 9(1), 101-113.
  21. Kang, M. S., Son, H. Y. & Park, S. H.(2012). Mobile Phone of Perceived Risk and Value on Customer Satisfaction and Behavior Intention, Journal of Commodity Science and Technology, 30(1), 89-96.
  22. Kang, S. B. & Chae, M. H.(2011). A Study on the Perceived Value and Adoption Behavior of the Smartphone Application, The Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 11(4), 187-208.
  23. Kim, B. S., Lee, J. & Kim, K. K.(2006). Factors Influencing of Perceived Trust, Risk, Usefulness and Convenience on Intention Using to Civil Service in E-Government, Informatization policy, 13(4), 186-202.
  24. Kim, D. W., Lee, T. M. & Kang, M. S.(2003). A study on the Effects of Perceived Risk and Perceived Quality on the Mobile-Commerce Adoption: An extension to the Technology Acceptance Model, Korea Journal of Business Administration, 35(1), 171-193.
  25. Kim, J. H. & Shin, Y. S.(2000). Factors Influencing the Consumers's Perceived Risks and Purchase Intentions in the Cyber Shopping Mall, Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 6(10), 47-67.
  26. Kim, J. W. & Kim, Y. G.(2012). The Effect of Perceived Risk and Trust on Users Acceptance of Cloud Computing : Mobile Cloud Computing, Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 35(3), 70-76.
  27. Kim, J. Y. & Chu, K. H.(2014). The Role of Perceived Value on the Continuance Intention in Mobile Social Network Service, Journal of Digital Convergence, Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(10), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.10.211
  28. Kim, S. E. & Nah, S. Y.(2000). Analysis of Factors Which Influence Consumers' Purchase Intentions in Electronic Commerce Market, Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 10(3), 61-77.
  29. Lee, H. J. & Choi, J. W.(2013). Influences of Transparency and Feedback on Customer Intention to Reuse Online Recommender Systems, The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 18(2), 279-299. https://doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2013.18.2.279
  30. Lee, K. H. & Kwahk, K. Y.(2015). Investigating the Determinants of Trust in the Internet Shopping Mall Environments: Focusing on the Moderation Effects of Perceived Risk and Perceived Price, Information systems review, 17(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.14329/isr.2015.17.2.001
  31. Lee, M. S.(2007). The Effect of Trust and Perceived Risk on the RFID, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 20(6), 2509-2538.
  32. Lee, T. M.(2003). An Empirical Research on the Determinants of Purchase Intention in Mobile Commerce, e-Business Review, 4(1), 89-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-014-0002-0
  33. Mitchell, A. A. & Olson, J. C.(1981). Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 318-332. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800306
  34. Nam, S. T., Lee, H. C. & Jin, C. Y.(2015). Influence of The Multimedia Function on Continue Using Intention of Smartphone Based SEM, Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, 19(6), 1347-1352. https://doi.org/10.6109/jkiice.2015.19.6.1347
  35. Nam, S. T. & Jin, C. Y.(2013). A Meta-analysis of Relationship between Constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model: Focusing on the Research Papers Published for Smartphone in Korea Journals, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 8(4), 67-79.
  36. Nam, S. T. & Jin, C. Y.(2015). Preference Analysis for Location Based Services on Smartphone Users; Focusing on the H University Students in Daejeon Area, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 10(4), 59-66.
  37. Oho, C. K.(2003). A Study of the Determinants of Certification Services Acceptance, Journal of International Management, 18(1), 77-100.
  38. Oho, S. S.(2009). Meta-Analysis: Theory and Practice, Konkuk University Publication.
  39. Orwin, R. G.(1983). Fail-Safe N for Effect Size, Journal of Educational Statistics, 8(2), 157-159. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164923
  40. Park, S. H. & Chung, K. H.(2016). A Study on the Influence of Consumer Innovativeness for Smartphone Purchase Intention: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Risk and Price Sensitivity, Korea Journal of Business Administration, 29(4), 575-595. https://doi.org/10.18032/kaaba.2016.29.4.575
  41. Roselius, T.(1971). Consumer Rankings of Risk Reduction Methods, Journal of Marketing, 35(1), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297103500210
  42. Song, Y. H.(2009). The Effect of Perceived Value and Subjective Ambivalence on Customer Satisfaction and Web-site Loyalty, Journal of Product Research, 27(2), 97-106.
  43. Sun, J. H. & Yoon, J. H.(2014). Factors Affecting on Users' Intention in using Social Commerce and Online, Management and Information Systems Review, 33(4), 99-118.
  44. Sun, Z. J.(2014). Factors Affecting on Users' Intention in using Social Commerce and Online Shopping, The Korea Contents Society, 14(3), 352-360.
  45. Sweeney, C., Soutar, N. & Johnson, W.(2001). The Role of Perceived Risk in the Quality-Value Relationship: A Study in a Retail Environment, Journal of Retailing, 75(1) 77-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80005-0
  46. Thompson, N. J. & Thompson, K. E.(1995). Reasoned Action Theory: An Application to Alcohol-free Beer, Journal of Marketing Practice, 2(2), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000000020
  47. Woodruff, R. B.(1997). Consumer Value: The Next Source for Competitive Advantage, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2) 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894350
  48. Yang, J. Y., Ahn, J. H. & Park, C. W.(2006). The Effect of Perceived Risk on the Intention to Adopt Mobile Banking Services, Journal of Technology Innovation, 14(3), 183-208.
  49. Yeung, R. M. W. & Morris, J.(2006). An Empirical Study of the Impact of Consumer Perceived Risk on Purchase Likelihood: A Modeling Approach, International, Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(3), 294-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00493.x
  50. Yoon, C. H. & Choi, D. O.(2009). Consumer Acceptance of E-Commerce in Korean and China The Effects of National Culture, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 22(1), 41-62.
  51. Yu, B. G., Lee, H. M. & Kim, S. K.(2016). The impact of mobile personalized service perception on mobile shopping satisfaction and loyalty: Focusing on the moderation effect of perceived control, Academy of customer satisfaction management, 18(1), 1-21.
  52. Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., Leonard, L. & Parasuraman, A.(1996). The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality, Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251886
  53. Zhang, R. M. & Moon, T. S.(2013). An Empirical Study on User Acceptance of Mobile Payment in China, The Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13(2), 187-215.