Korea Information Processing Society Review (정보처리학회지)

Korea Information Processing Society (한국정보처리학회)
권호 표지

오픈 사이언스의 사회적 영향력 측정 지표: Altmetrics

  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Guidelines on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Research Data in Horizon 2020, European Commission Directorate- General for Research & Innovation, 2016
  2. Be Open to Open Science: Stakeholders Should Prepare for the Future, not Cling to the Past, LIBER, 2016. Available at: http://libereurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/B e-Open-to-Open-Science.pdf
  3. Be Open to Open Science - Libraries Call on All Stakeholders to Play a Constructive Role, IFLA, 2016, Available at: http://www.ifla.org/node/10516
  4. Be Open to Open Science : Stakeholders Should Prepare for the Future, not Cling to the Past EBLIDA,2016. Available at: http://www.eblida.org/news/be-open-to-open-scien ce.html
  5. 오픈 사이언스로 대중과 과학을 연결하다., 김승환, 2016. Available at: http://blog.naver.co m/nststory2014/220607120400
  6. Measuring the societal impact of open science, 2:AM Altmetrics and open science, Holmberg, K., 2015. Available at: http://altmetricsconference.com/2am-altmetrics-and-o pen-science/
  7. Nisonger, Thomas E. 2004. "The benefits and drawbacks of impact factor for journal collection management in libraries." The Serials Librarian. 47(1-2): 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v47n01_04
  8. Glanzel, Wolfgang, and Moed, Henk F. 2002. "Journal impact measures in bibliometric research." Scientometrics 53(2): 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014848323806
  9. DORA: http://www.ascb.org/dora/
  10. Hirsch, J. E. 2005. "An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46): 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  11. Moed, Henk F. 2010. "Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals." Journal of Informetrics 4(3): 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002
  12. Waltman, Ludo, et al. 2013. "Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator." Journal of informetrics 7(2): 272-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.011
  13. Guerrero Bote, Vicente P., Borja Gonzalez-Pereira, and Felix de Moya-Anegon. 2009. "The SJR indicator: A new indicator of journals' scientific prestige." ArXiv.
  14. Moed, H. F. 2005. "Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10): 1088-1097. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20200
  15. Schloegl, C., & Gorraiz, J. 2010. "Comparison of citation and usage indicators: the case of oncology journals." Scientometrics, 82(3): 567-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0172-1
  16. Brody, T., Harnad, S., & Carr, L. 2006. "Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8): 1060-1072. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20373
  17. McDonald, J. D. 2007. "Understanding journal usage: A statistical analysis of citation and use." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(1): 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20420
  18. Duy, J., & Vaughan, L. 2006. "Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(5): 512-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2006.05.005
  19. Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegon, F. (2014). "Relationship between Downloads and Citation and the influence of language." Scientometrics, 101(2): 1043-1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1243-5
  20. CoUNTER: Code of Practice on Journal Usage Factor. https://www.projectcounter.org/
  21. Bollen, J., & Sompel, H. V. D. 2008. "Usage impact factor: the effects of sample characteristics on usage‐based impact metrics." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology, 59(1): 136-149. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20746
  22. Schloegl, C., & Gorraiz, J. 2010. "Comparison of citation and usage indicators: the case of oncology journals." Scientometrics, 82(3): 567-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0172-1
  23. Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. H. 2010. "Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web." First Monday, 15(7).inger 2010;
  24. Galligan and Dyas-Correia 2013
  25. Bornmann, L. 2014. "Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics." Scientometrics, 103(3): 1123-1144.
  26. Wouters, P., & Costas, R. 2012. "Users, Narcissism and Control: Tracking the Impact of Scholarly Publications in the 21st Century." Utrecht, Netherlands: SURF Foundation. research-acumen.eu/wp-content/uploads/Users-narcissism-and-control.
  27. Piwowar, H. 2013. "Introduction altmetrics: What, why and where?." Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(4): 8-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2013.1720390404
  28. Hammarfelt, B. 2014. "Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities." Scientometrics, 101(2): 1419-1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1261-3
  29. Mohammadi, E., & Thelwall, M. 2014. "Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(8): 1627-1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23071
  30. 조재인. 2015. "Altmetrics 를 통한 연구의 영향력 평가에 관한 연구." 한국도서관.정보학회지, 46(1): 65-81.
  31. Gumpenberger, C., Glanzel, W. & Gorraiz, 2016. "The ecstasy and the agony of the altmetric score", Scientometrics,108(2):977-982 doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1991-5
  32. Shuai, X., Pepe, A., & Bollen., J. 2012. "How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: Article downloads Twitter mentions, and citations." Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.2461v1.
  33. Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. 2014. "How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of 'alternative metrics' in scientific publications." Scientometrics, 101(2): 1491-1513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1264-0
  34. Bornmann, L. 2014. "Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics." Scientometrics, 103(3): 1123-1144.
  35. David Walters, Institutional services and altmetrics as drivers for a cultural transition to open scholarship, 2:AM Altmetrics and open science, 2015. Available at: http://altmetricsconference.com/2am-altmetr ics-and-open-science/
  36. Council of the European Union, The transition towards an Open Science system - Council conclusions (adopted on 27/05/2016), Available at: http://data.consilium.europa.eu/ doc/document/ST-9526-2016-INIT/en/pdf 2016
  37. European Commission, Next-generation altmetrics: responsible metrics and evaluation for open science, Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/p df/call_for_evidence_next_generation_altmetr ics.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none, 2016.
  38. Altmetric.com: http://www.altmetric.com/
  39. ImpactStory.org: http://www.impactstory.org/
  40. Plum X Metrics: http://plumanalytics.com/
  41. PLoS의 ALM(Article-Level-Metrics): http://arti cle-level-metrics.plos.org/
  42. Youngim Jung, Metadata Schema ver. 1.0 of Korea DOI Center, The 3rd Asian Science Editors' Conference and Workshop 2016,