인지과학 (Korean Journal of Cognitive Science)

한국인지과학회 (The Korean Society for Cognitive Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

경쟁과 비경쟁 상황에서 공감의 신경학적 기제

Neural Bases of Empathy in Competitive vs. non-Competitive situation

  • 투고 : 2016.09.29
  • 심사 : 2016.09.29
  • 발행 : 2016.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 fMRI 기법을 이용하여 경쟁 상황 노출 여부에 따라 개인이 타인의 상황을 이해하고 인지적 공감을 유발하는 신경학적 기제의 차이를 조사하였다. 공감은 타인에 대한 이해를 바탕으로 적절한 반응을 보이는 심리적 반응이며, 인간의 생존에 있어서 적응적 요소로 알려져 있다. 연구의 목적은 Preston과 de Waal(2002)에 기초하여 거의 자동적인 반응인 공감이 타인을 이겨야 하고 본인의 수행에 따라 보상이 달라지는 경쟁 상황에서도 1) 타인이 처한 상황을 인지할 수 있는지, 2) 인지한다면 인지적 공감이 유발되는지를 확인해 보는 것이다. 대학생 21명(남:여=9:12)을 대상으로, 일상생활에서 경험할 수 있는 6가지 정서가 제시된 그림자극을 보고 '나'의 관점에서 유발되는 정서가 긍정정서인지 부정정서인지 평정하는 과제 수행동안 뇌 활성화를 촬영하였다. 경쟁 유무에 따라 공감과정에서 두뇌 활동의 차이를 비교하기 위해 실험보조자 1인이 경쟁자 역할을 수행하고, 수행 결과의 정확도와 반응 시간을 기준으로 피험자가 경쟁자(실험보조자)를 이길 경우 보상(돈)을 제공하는 조건으로 경쟁심을 유발하여 경쟁 조건을 조작하였다. 연구결과, 피험자들의 판단 반응시간은 비경쟁 상황보다 경쟁에 노출되었을 때 통계적으로 유의하게 빠름을 확인하였고, 경쟁 상황에서는 전대상회(ACC, BA 32), 내측전두엽(mPFC, BA 6), 측두두정연합부의 한 부분인 연상회(SMG, BA 40), 시상(thalamus), 중전두엽(middle frontal gyrus, BA 10) 등이 활성화 된 반면, 비경쟁 상황에서는 인접대상회(paracingulate, BA 32), 측두엽극(temporal pole, BA 38), 복내측전전두엽(vmPFC, BA 11), 상후두엽/쐐기소엽(superior occipital gyrus/cuneus, BA 19) 등의 영역에서 활성화가 관찰되었다. 또한 경쟁상황에서 개인의 공감 수준에 따라 두뇌 영역과의 상관을 알아보기 위해 공감에 대한 자기 보고식 반응 점수를 공변량으로 이용하여 중다회귀분석을 실시한 결과, 경쟁 상황에서는 우측 연상회(rSMG, BA 40), 하전두엽(inferior frontal gyrus, BA 47/45), 내측전두엽(mPFC, BA 10/6), 시상(thalamus), 피각(putamen), 방추형회(fusiform gyrus, BA 20/21)영역과의 상관이 높은 반면, 비경쟁 상황에서는 공감 수준이 높을수록 측두두정연합부/상측두엽(temporoparietal junction/superior temporal gyrus) 영역이 높은 상관을 보였다. 이 연구의 결과를 통해 경쟁 노출 여부에 따라서 타인에 대한 공감적 인지과정에 서로 다른 두뇌영역이 사용되며, 특히 개인의 공감 수준이 높을수록 경쟁 상황에서도 타인의 상황에 대해 이해하는 인지적 공감과 관련한 두뇌 영역이 높은 상관을 보여 개인차에 따라 경쟁 지각이 다르게 반응함을 알 수 있었다.

This fMRI study is aim to investigate effects of competitive environment in cognitive empathic process in human brain. Empathy is known as a crucial factor for human's adaptive behavior in aspects of social cognition and it is almost automatic process, on the other hand competitive situation is psychologically devastated environment to win someone for getting rewards. We hypnotized that reading and understanding of other person's mind are a specific characteristic related to survival evolutionarily, however competition would have an effect on the empathic cognitive process because of mechanisms of competition. To manipulate the competitive atmosphere, one researcher took a role of competitor against participants and they were instructed to get monetary rewards when their performance was better than a competitor. 21 participants(9 males and 12 females) performed to judge the emotional valence of the empathic task consisted of illustrated images with various situation could be experienced in real world as on $1^{st}$ person perspective in both competitive and non-competitive condition, and did same performance with objects stimulus in control condition. In order to examine the competition effects on empathic process,, hemodynamic response were obtained during fMRI session and the imaging data were analyzed to identify brain regions where responses to each condition across the two consecutive runs. Participants' reaction time in competitive condition was faster statistically significant than non-competitive one. Activation for competitive condition increased in the following areas: ACC, mPFC, SMG, thalamus extended caudate and Nacc, parahippocampal gyrus, and for non-competitive condition increased paracingulate gyrus, temporal pole, vmPFC, superior occipital gyrus. As a result of regression analysis using empathic scores as covariance, the rSMG, IFG, fusiform gyrus, thalamus, putamen were correlated with higher empathic levels, and TPJ were correlated with lower empathic scores. We suggest that these observations could mean competitive environment have an effect on neural base of cognitive empathic process.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 강유선, 박경 (2014). 중학생의 공감과 또래관계 질에서 정서표현성의 매개효과. 한국청소년연구, 25, 5-45.
  2. 강준 (2013). 정서 점화 효과에 기반한 공감의 개인차 연구. 고려대학교 석사학위 청구논문.
  3. 고수일 (2011). 자율성, 성과-보상 연계성, 경쟁성이 내재적 동기에 미치는 영향: 목표지향성의 매개역할. 경영교육연구, 69, 379-398.
  4. 권주현, 박영신 (2013). 마음의 이해와 공감이 독재자 게임에 나타난 아동의 친사회적 행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 26, 117-138.
  5. 김윤태, 홍승후 (2004). 운동과학편: 골프선수들의 성취목표성향과 경쟁상태불안, 자기효능감 및 수행결과와의 관계. 한국사회체육학회지, 22(단일호), 379-390.
  6. 김정미 (2009). 고교생의 공감, 또래영향력, 사회적 지지와 공격성과의 관계. 교육학연구, 47, 49-72.
  7. 박성희 (1996). 공감의 구성요소와 친사회적 행동의 관계연구. 교육학연구, 34, 143-166.
  8. 박성희 (2004). 공감학. 서울: 학지사.
  9. 배은경 (2011). 청소년의 공감능력이 자아존중감을 매개로 학교적응에 미치는 영향. 한국심리치료학회지, 3, 85-100.
  10. 송춘현 (2012). 초등학생의 성취목표에 따른 경쟁에 대한 평가와 자아존중감 및 정서 간 인과관계. 한국초등체육학회지, 18, 121-133.
  11. 이병기 (1998). 이전수행, 목표설정, 경쟁불안과 자기효능감 및 수행과의 관계. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 9, 51-68.
  12. 조영남, 배창식 (2001). 집단보상 및 집단구성 방법에 따른 협동학습이 초등 수학과 학업성취에 미치는 효과. 초등교육연구, 14, 119-136.
  13. 조은주, 정윤경 (2014). 아동의 의도적 통제와 공감능력이 친사회적 행동에 미치는 영향. 인간발달연구, 21, 129-147.
  14. 현지영, 김수영 (2015). '공감의 뿌리'프로그램이 유아의 공감능력 향상과 공격성감소에 미치는 효과. The Journal of Child Education, 24, 313-328.
  15. Akitsuki, Y., & Decety, J. (2009). Social context and perceived agency affects empathy for pain: an event-related fMRI investigation. Neuroimage, 47, 722-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.091
  16. Allman, J. M., Hakeem, A., Erwin, J. M., Nimchinsky, E., & Hof, P. (2001). The anterior cingulate cortex. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 935, 107-117.
  17. Anders, S., Lotze, M., Erb, M., Grodd, W., & Birbaumer, N. (2004). Brain activity underlying emotional valence and arousal: A response-related fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 23, 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20048
  18. Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751-758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297237008
  19. Chan, J. C., & Lam, S. F. (2008). Effects of competition on students' self-efficacy in vicarious learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X185509
  20. Cikara, M., Jenkins, A. C., Dufour, N., & Saxe, R. (2014). Reduced self-referential neural response during intergroup competition predicts competitor harm. NeuroImage, 96, 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.080
  21. Dale, A. M., & Buckner, R. L. (1997). Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 5, 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:5<329::AID-HBM1>3.0.CO;2-5
  22. Decety, J. (2015). The neural pathways, development and functions of empathy. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.12.001
  23. Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2006). A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 54-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00406.x
  24. Decety, J., Jackson, P. L., Sommerville, J. A., Chaminade, T., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2004). The neural bases of cooperation and competition: an fMRI investigation. Neuroimage, 23, 744-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.025
  25. Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2007). The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. The Neuroscientist, 13, 580-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858407304654
  26. Decety, J., & Sommerville, J. A. (2003). Shared representations between self and other: a social cognitive neuroscience view. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 527-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.004
  27. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627.
  28. Donaldson, D. I. & Buckner, R. L. (2001). Effective paradigm design. In P. M. Matthews et al.(eds), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain: Methods for Neuroscience (pp. 18-19). New York: Oxford University Press.
  29. Dvash, J., Gilam, G., Ben-Ze'ev, A., Hendler, T., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2010). The envious brain: the neural basis of social comparison. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 1741-1750.
  30. Ernst, M., Nelson, E. E., McClure, E. B., Monk, C. S., Munson, S., Eshel, N., Zarahn, E., Leibenluft, E., Zametkin, A., Towbin, K., Blair, J., Charney, D., Pine, D. S. (2004). Choice selection and reward anticipation: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1585-1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.05.011
  31. Farrer, C., Franck, N., Georgieff, N., Frith, C. D., Decety, J., & Jeannerod, M. (2003). Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study. Neuroimage, 18, 324-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(02)00041-1
  32. Farrer, C., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: the neural correlates of the experience of agency. Neuroimage, 15, 596-603. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1009
  33. Fink, G. R., Markowitsch, H. J., Reinkemeier, M., Bruckbauer, T., Kessler, J., & Heiss, W. D. (1996). Cerebral representation of one's own past: neural networks involved in autobiographical memory. The Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 4275-4282. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-13-04275.1996
  34. Fliessbach, K., Weber, B., Trautner, P., Dohmen, T., Sunde, U., Elger, C. E., & Falk, A. (2007). Social comparison affects reward-related brain activity in the human ventral striatum. Science, 318, 1305-1308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1145876
  35. Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 358, 459-473. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1218
  36. Gallagher, H. L., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Functional imaging of 'theory of mind'. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00025-6
  37. Gallagher, H. L., Jack, A. I., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. Neuroimage, 16, 814-821. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1117
  38. Gusnard, D. A., Akbudak, E., Shulman, G. L., & Raichle, M. E. (2001). Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: relation to a default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 4259-4264. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.071043098
  39. Halko, M. L., Hlushchuk, Y., Hari, R., & Schürmann, M. (2009). Competing with peers: Mentalizing-related brain activity reflects what is at stake. Neuroimage, 46, 542-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.063
  40. Hoffman, M. L. (2011). Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  41. Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2005). How do we perceive the pain of others?. A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage, 24, 771-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.006
  42. Kramer, U. M., Mohammadi, B., Donamayor, N., Samii, A., & Munte, T. F. (2010). Emotional and cognitive aspects of empathy and their relation to social cognition-an fMRI-study. Brain Research, 1311, 110-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.043
  43. Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., & Decety, J. (2007). The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 42-58. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.42
  44. Lamm, C., Decety, J., & Singer, T. (2011). Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. Neuroimage, 54, 2492-2502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.014
  45. Lane, R. D., Chua, P. M., & Dolan, R. J. (1999). Common effects of emotional valence, arousal and attention on neural activation during visual processing of pictures. Neuropsychologia, 37, 989-997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00017-2
  46. Lane, R. D., Fink, G. R., Chau, P. M. L., & Dolan, R. J. (1997). Neural activation during selective attention to subjective emotional responses. Neuroreport, 8, 3969-3972. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199712220-00024
  47. McCormick, D. A., & Bal, T. (1997). Sleep and arousal: thalamocortical mechanisms. Annual Reveiw of Neuroscichology, 20, 185-215. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.185
  48. Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Bramati, I. E., & Grafman, J. (2002). Functional networks in emotional moral and nonmoral social judgments. Neuroimage, 16, 696-703. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1118
  49. Nummenmaa, L., Hirvonen, J., Parkkola, R., & Hietanen, J. K. (2008). Is emotional contagion special? An fMRI study on neural systems for affective and cognitive empathy. Neuroimage, 43, 571-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.014
  50. Phan, K. L., Wager, T., Taylor, S. F., & Liberzon, I. (2002). Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. Neuroimage, 16, 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1087
  51. Polosan, M., Baciu, M., Cousin, E., Perrone, M., Pichat, C., & Bougerol, T. (2011). An fMRI study of the social competition in healthy subjects. Brain and Cognition, 77, 401-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.08.018
  52. Preston, S. D., & De Waal, F. B. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000018
  53. Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Elements of the competitive situation that affect intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296221003
  54. Reniers, R. L., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N. M., & Vollm, B. A. (2011). The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.528484
  55. Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2004). How would you feel versus how do you think she would feel? A neuroimaging study of perspective-taking with social emotions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 988-999. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929041502661
  56. Schnell, K., Bluschke, S., Konradt, B., & Walter, H. (2011). Functional relations of empathy and mentalizing: an fMRI study on the neural basis of cognitive empathy. Neuroimage, 54, 1743-1754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.024
  57. Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2011). The neural bases for empathy. The Neuroscientist, 17, 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858410379268
  58. Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2007). Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: a lesion study. Neuropsychologia, 45, 3054-3067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.021
  59. Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Perry, D. (2009). Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132, 617-627. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn279
  60. Silani, G., Lamm, C., Ruff, C. C., & Singer, T. (2013). Right supramarginal gyrus is crucial to overcome emotional egocentricity bias in social judgments. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 15466-15476. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1488-13.2013
  61. Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439, 466-469.
  62. Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. 3-Dimensional proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers.
  63. Tauer, J. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1999). Winning isn't everything: Competition, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 209-238. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1383
  64. Vansteenkiste, M., & Deci, E. L. (2003). Competitively contingent rewards and intrinsic motivation: Can losers remain motivated?. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 273-299. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026259005264
  65. Vogeley, K., Bussfeld, P., Newen, A., Herrmann, S., Happe, F., Falkai, P., Maier, W., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., & Zilles, K. (2001). Mind reading: neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. Neuroimage, 14, 170-181. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0789
  66. Vollm, B. A., Taylor, A. N., Richardson, P., Corcoran, R., Stirling, J., McKie, S., Deakin, J. F. W., & Elliott, R. (2006). Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task. Neuroimage, 29, 90-98.
  67. Vuilleumier, P., Armony, J. L., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2001). Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: an event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 30, 829-841. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00328-2
  68. Wittmann, B. C., Schott, B. H., Guderian, S., Frey, J. U., Heinze, H. J., & Duzel, E. (2005). Reward-related FMRI activation of dopaminergic midbrain is associated with enhanced hippocampus-dependent long-term memory formation. Neuron, 45, 459-467.