Korean Journal of Cognitive Science (인지과학)

The Korean Society for Cognitive Science (한국인지과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing Korean Affect Word List and It's Application

정서가, 각성가 및 구체성 평정을 통한 한국어 정서단어 목록 개발

  • Received : 2016.09.01
  • Accepted : 2016.09.14
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Current lists of the Korean emotion words either do not consider word frequency, or only include emotion expression words such as 'joy' while disregarding emotion inducing words like 'heaven'. Also, none of the current lists contains the concreteness level of the emotional words. Therefore, the current study aimed to develop a new Korean affect word list that makes up such limitations of the current lists. To do so, in experiment 1, valence, arousal and concreteness ratings of the 450 Korean emotion expression nouns and emotion inducing nouns were surveyed with 399 participants. In addition, in experiment 2, an emotional stroop task was performed with the newly developed word list to test the usefulness of the list. The results showed clear patterns of the congruency effects between emotional words and emotion expressing faces. Increased response times and more errors were found when the emotion of the words and faces are non-matched, than when they were matched. The result suggested that the newly developed Korean affect word list can be effectively adapted to studies examining the influence of various aspects emotion.

본 연구의 목적은 정서가, 각성가 및 구체성 평정을 통해 한국어 정서단어 목록을 개발하고 이를 활용한 연구를 통해 이 목록의 실험 자극으로서 활용가능성을 확인해보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 연구1에서는 단어 이해과정에 큰 영향을 미친다고 알려진 단어의 품사, 빈도 및 길이를 고려하여 450개의 단어를 선정하고 이 단어들에 대해 정서가, 각성가, 구체성에 대한 평정 설문을 실시하였다. 정서단어의 평정을 위해서는 전체 단어목록을 3개로 나누어 각각 155명, 151명, 151명의 참가자들에게 각 단어들의 정서가와 각성가를 평정하게 하였으며 또 다른 134명의 참가자들에게 정서단어의 구체성을 평정하게 하였다. 그 결과 총 450개 단어에 대한 정서가, 각성가 및 구체성 평정값이 포함된 정서단어 목록이 개발되었다. 연구2에서는 42명을 대상으로 연구1에서 개발한 정서단어 목록을 활용한 정서 스트룹 실험을 실시하였다. 그 결과 정서불일치 시행에 비해 정서일치 시행의 반응시간이 더 빠르게 나타났으며, 정서일치 시행에서의 정확률이 더 높게 나타났다. 이는 연구1에서 선정 및 구성된 정서단어 자극을 활용한 연구 예를 보여주는 것이며 본 목록이 정서 연구의 자극 재료로서 다양한 정서 관련 연구에 활용될 가능성이 있음을 보여준다.

Keywords

References

  1. 권유안, 이윤형 (2014). 시각적 단어재인과정에서 단어 빈도와 단어 길이효과의 발현 시점: 사건 관련 뇌전위 연구 증거. 언어과학연구, 69, 43-62.
  2. 김민우, 최준식, 조양석 (2011). 고려대학교얼굴표정모음집 (KUFEC) 과 의미미분법을 통한 정서차원평정. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 30, 1189-1211.
  3. 김보라 (2010). 한국어 정서유발 단어집의 개발. 연세대학교 석사학위논문.
  4. 박영신, 김기중, 박희경 (2004). DRM 패러다임에서 오기억과 실제 기억에 미치는 부적 정서의 효과. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 16, 131-150.
  5. 박인조, 민경환 (2005). 한국어 감정단어의 목록 작성과 차원 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19, 109-129.
  6. 박태진 (2004). 자료: 한국어 단어의 연상 빈도 및 심상가 조사. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 16, 237-260.
  7. 박태진, 박선희 (2009). IAPS 자극에 대한 한국 대학생의 정서 평가. 인지과학, 20, 183-195.
  8. 박현수, 이찬수, 장자순 (2011). LED 조명색상이 정서자극의 평정과 재인에 미치는 효과. 감성과학, 14, 371-384.
  9. 서상규 (1998). 현대 한국어의 어휘빈도. 서울: 연세대학교 언어정보개발연구원.
  10. 안신호, 이승혜, 권오식 (1993). 정서의 구조: 한국어 정서단어 분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 7, 107-123.
  11. 정봉교, 김지연 (2004). 스트레스 취약성 및 과제가 심혈관계 반응성에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 9, 935-952.
  12. 정봉교, 김지연, 오유정 (2003). 정동유형과 정적 정서의 복원효과. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 15, 499-519.
  13. 제갈은주, 안창일 (2012). 정서 스트룹 과제에서 나타나는 우울증 환자들의 인지편향 현상. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 31, 111-126.
  14. 최문기 (2005). 일반인을 대상으로 한 정서정보에 따른 주의편향 효과 분석. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 17, 111-130.
  15. 한덕웅, 강혜자 (2000). 한국어 정서 용어들의 적절성과 경험 빈도. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 19, 63-99.
  16. Altarriba, J., & Bauer, L. M. (2004). The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: A comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words. The American Journal of Psychology, 117, 389-410. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149007
  17. Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C. (1999). Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 578-602. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200738
  18. Anes, M. D., & Kruer, J. L. (2004). Investigating hemispheric specialization in a novel face-word Stroop task. Brain and Language, 89, 136-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00311-0
  19. Barton, J. J., Hanif, H. M., Eklinder Bjornstrom, L., & Hills, C. (2014). The word-length effect in reading: A review. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31, 378-412. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2014.895314
  20. Bertels, J., Kolinsky, R., & Morais, J. (2009). Norms of emotional valence, arousal, threat value and shock value for 80 spoken French words: Comparison between neutral and emotional tones of voice. Psychologica Belgica, 49, 19-40. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-49-1-19
  21. Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2013). Is emotional Stroop interference linked to affective responses? Evidence from skin conductance and facial electromyography. Emotion, 13, 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029520
  22. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings (Technical Report No. C-1). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention.
  23. Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 904-911. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
  24. Bush, L. E. ll. (1972). Empirical selection of adjectives denoting feelings. JSAS Catalogue 01 Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 67.
  25. Carreiras, M., Armstrong, B. C., Perea, M., & Frost, R. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005
  26. Egner, T., Etkin, A., Gale, S., & Hirsch, J. (2008). Dissociable neural systems resolve conflict from emotional versus nonemotional distracters. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1475-1484. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm179
  27. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial expressions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  28. Etkin, A., Egner, T., Peraza, D. M., Kandel, E. R., & Hirsch, J. (2006). Resolving emotional conflict: a role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala. Neuron, 51, 871-882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.029
  29. Ferrand, L., & New, B. (2003). Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming. Acta Psychologica, 113, 167-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(03)00031-3
  30. Gilet, A. L., Gruhn, D., Studer, J., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (2012). Valence, arousal, and imagery ratings for 835 French attributes by young, middle-aged, and older adults: The French Emotional Evaluation List (FEEL). Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee/European Review of Applied Psychology, 62, 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.03.003
  31. Gootjes, L., Coppens, L. C., Zwaan, R. A., Franken, I. H., & Van Strien, J. W. (2011). Effects of recent word exposure on emotion-word Stroop interference: An ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 79, 356-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.12.003
  32. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518
  33. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (1998). Mapping the domain of expressivity: multimethod evidence for a hierarchical model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 170-191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.170
  34. Haas, B. W., Omura, K., Constable, R. T., & Canli, T. (2006). Interference produced by emotional conflict associated with anterior cingulate activation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, 152-156. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.6.2.152
  35. Hauk, O., & Pulvermuller, F. (2004). Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1090-1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.020
  36. Hinojosa, J. A., Mendez-Bertolo, C., & Pozo, M. A. (2010). Looking at emotional words is not the same as reading emotional words: Behavioral and neural correlates. Psychophysiology, 47, 748-757.
  37. Kanske, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2010). Modulation of early conflict processing: N200 responses to emotional words in a flanker task. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3661-3664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.021
  38. Kavcic, V., & Clarke, J. M. (2000). Hemispheric interactions during a face-word Stroop-analog task. Neuropsychology, 14, 579-587. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.14.4.579
  39. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings (Tech. Rep.). University of Florida: Gainesville. Retrieved from http://csea.phhp.ufl.edu/Media.html#midmedia.
  40. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (Technical Report A-8.). University of Florida: Gainesville.
  41. Larsen, R. J., Mercer, K. A., Balota, D. A., & Strube, M. J. (2008). Not all negative words slow down lexical decision and naming speed: importance of word arousal. Emotion, 8, 445-452. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.445
  42. Lawton, M. P., Kleban, M. H., Rajagopal, D., & Dean, J. (1992). Dimensions of affective experience in three age groups. Psychology and Aging, 7, 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.7.2.171
  43. Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Ohman, A. (1998). The Karolinska directed emotional faces (KDEF). CD ROM from Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology Section, Karolinska Institutet, 91-630.
  44. Lyons, M., Akamatsu, S., Kamachi, M., & Gyoba, J. (1998). Coding facial expressions with gabor wavelets. Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, Proceedings. Third IEEE International Conference on (pp. 200-205). IEEE.
  45. Mroczek, D. K., & Kolarz, C. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: a developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1333-1349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1333
  46. Norby, S., Lange, M., & Larsen, A. (2010). Forgetting to forget: On the duration of voluntary suppression of neutral and emotional memories. Acta Psychologica, 133, 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.10.002
  47. Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  48. Picard, R. W., & Picard, R. (1997). Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  49. Preston, S. D., & Stansfield, R. B. (2008). I know how you feel: Task-irrelevant facial expressions are spontaneously processed at a semantic level. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 54-64. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.8.1.54
  50. Redondo, J., Fraga, I., Padron, I., & Comesana, M. (2007). The Spanish adaptation of ANEW (affective norms for English words). Behavior Research Methods, 39, 600-605. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193031
  51. Rellecke, J., Palazova, M., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A. (2011). On the automaticity of emotion processing in words and faces: event-related brain potentials evidence from a superficial task. Brain and Cognition, 77, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.07.001
  52. Russell, J. A. (1978). Evidence of convergent validity on the dimensions of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1152-1168. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.10.1152
  53. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1162-1171.
  54. Sawchuk, C. N., Lohr, J. M., Lee, T. C., & Tolin, D. F. (1999). Exposure to disgust-evoking imagery and information processing biases in blood-injection-injury phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 249-257.
  55. Schwanenflugel, P. J., Akin, C., & Luh, W. M. (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 96-104. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208259
  56. Stenberg, G., Wiking, S., & Dahl, M. (1998). Judging words at face value: Interference in a word processing task reveals automatic processing of affective facial expressions. Cognition & Emotion, 12, 755-782. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999398379420
  57. Stevenson, R. A., Mikels, J. A., & James, T. W. (2007). Characterization of the affective norms for English words by discrete emotional categories. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 1020-1024. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192999
  58. Tse, C. S., & Altarriba, J. (2007). Testing the associative-link hypothesis in immediate serial recall: Evidence from word frequency and word imageability effects. Memory, 15, 675-690. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701467186
  59. Tse, C. S., & Altarriba, J. (2009). The word concreteness effect occurs for positive, but not negative, emotion words in immediate serial recall. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X318617
  60. Vo, M. L., Conrad, M., Kuchinke, L., Urton, K., Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). The Berlin affective word list reloaded (BAWL-R). Behavior Research Methods, 41, 534-538. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.534
  61. Vo, M. L., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2006). Cross-validating the Berlin affective word list. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 606-609. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193892
  62. Zhu, X. R., Zhang, H. J., Wu, T. T., Luo, W. B., & Luo, Y. J. (2010). Emotional conflict occurs at an early stage: Evidence from the emotional face-word Stroop task. Neuroscience Letters, 478, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.04.036

Cited by

  1. The Positivity Effect in Memory in Older Adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline: A Comparison with Normal Elderly and Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment vol.32, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.35574/kjdp.2019.12.32.4.21
  2. Diffusion model-based understanding of subliminal affective priming in continuous flash suppression vol.11, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90917-w