Students' Knowledge, Acceptance of Theory of Evolution and Epistemology: Cross-sectional Study of Grade Level Differences

  • Received : 2016.01.26
  • Accepted : 2016.04.22
  • Published : 2016.04.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the variables of knowledge, acceptance of theory of evolution and epistemology that could be keys for teaching and learning the theory of evolution within school contexts, and to suggest instructional tips for teaching evolution in relation to the grade levels of education. This cross-sectional study examined the grade level differences (8th, 11th, and preservice teachers) of four variables: evolutionary knowledge; acceptance of theory of evolution; and both domain-specific epistemology (nature of science in relation to evolution) and context-specific epistemology (scientific epistemological views) and their relationships. This study, then, built conceptual models of each grade level students' acceptance of theory of evolution among the factors of evolutionary knowledge and epistemology (both domain-specific and context-specific). The results showed that the scores of evolutionary knowledge, evolution in relation to NOS, and scientific epistemology increased as the grade levels of education go up(p<.05) except the scores of acceptance of theory of evolution(p>.05). In addition, the 8th graders' and the 11th graders' acceptance of evolutionary theory was most explained by 'evolution in relation to NOS', while the preservice teachers' acceptance of evolutionary theory was most explained by evolutionary knowledge. Interestingly, 'scientific epistemological views' were only included for the 8th graders, while evolutionary knowledge and 'evolution in relation to NOS' (context-specific epistemology) were included in explaining all the level of students' acceptance of evolutionary theory. This study implicated that when teaching and learning of the theory of evolution in school contexts, knowledge, acceptance of evolutionary theory and epistemology could be considered appropriately for the different grade levels of students.

Keywords

References

  1. Alters, B. J., & Nelson, C. E. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution, 56(10), 1891-1901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00115.x
  2. Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of research in science teaching, 27(5), 415-427. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270503
  3. Brem, S. K., Ranney, M., & Schindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education, 87(2), 181-206. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10105
  4. Clough, M. P. (1994). Diminish students' resistance to biological evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 86(7), 409-415.
  5. Dager, Z. R., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(5), 429-445. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199705)34:5<429::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-S
  6. Demastes, S. S., Good, R. G., & Peebles, P. (1995). Students' conceptual ecologies and the process of conceptual change in evolution. Science Education, 79(6), 637-666. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790605
  7. Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 420-443. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20223
  8. Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in Biology makes any sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35, 125-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/4444260
  9. Ha, N. & Cha, H. (2006). Analysis of mis-conceptualizations regarding evolution originating from TV animation and science books for children. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(4), 352-362.
  10. Ha, M., Haury, D. L., & Nehm, R. H. (2012). Feeling of certainty: Uncovering a missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 95-121. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20449
  11. Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp.169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  12. Heo, Y. (2010). The relationship between Christian belief and the concept of evolution. Master's thesis, The Korea National University of Education.
  13. Hofer, B. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 225, 378-405.
  14. Hofer, B. K., Lam, C. F., & DeLisi, A. (2011). Understanding evolutionary theory. In R. S. Taylor & M. Ferrari (Eds), Epistemology and Science Education: Understanding the evolution vs. intelligent design controversy (pp.77-94). Madison, NY: Routledge.
  15. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of educational research, 67(1), 88-140. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088
  16. Hokayem, H., & BouJaoude, S. (2008). College students' perceptions of the theory of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 395-419. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20233
  17. Im, E. H., Cho, J. I., & Hong, H. H. (2007). College Students' Views about Origins of Life and Evolution. Journal of Science Education, 31, 11-26.
  18. Johnson, R. L., & Peebles, E. E. (1987). The role of scientific understanding in college: Student acceptance of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 49, 93-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/4448445
  19. Kardash, C. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1996). Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.260
  20. Kim, J., & Cha, H. (2014). Association analysis of variables affected for macroevolution conceptions of in-service and pre-service biology teachers. Biology Education, 42(4), 428-438. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2014.42.4.428
  21. Kim, S. Y. (2014). High school students' understanding and acceptance of the theory of evolution, and nature of science: The comparison of Christian vs. Non-Christian. Teacher Education Research, 53(2), 221-230. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.53.2.201406.221
  22. Kim, S. Y. (2015). The relation of high school students' epistemological belief, acceptance of evolutionary theory and evolutionary knowledge. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(2), 259-265. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.2.0259
  23. Kim, S. Y., & Nehm, R. H. (2011). A cross-cultural comparison of Korean and American science teachers' views of evolution and the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 197-227.
  24. Nehm, R. H., Kim, S. Y., & Sheppard, K. (2009). Academic preparation in biology and advocacy for teaching evolution: biology versus non-biology teachers. Science Education, 93(6), 1122-1146. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20340
  25. Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(5), 699-723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9062-7
  26. Park, H. (2012). Analysis of association among preservice biology teachers' acceptance and conception about evolution and their nature of science. Master's thesis, The Korea National University of Education.
  27. Rutledge, M. L., & Mitchell, M. A. (2002). High school biology teachers' knowledge structure, acceptance, and teaching of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 64, 21-27.
  28. Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (1999). Development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17441.x
  29. Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (2000). Science and high school biology teachers: Critical relationships. The American Biology Teacher, 62, 23-31. https://doi.org/10.2307/4450822
  30. Scharmann, L. C. (1990). Enhancing an understanding of the premises of evolutionary theory: The influence of a diversified instructional strategy. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12000.x
  31. Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 510-528. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10087
  32. Trani, R. (2004). I won't teach evolution: It's against my religion. The American Biology Teacher, 66, 419-427.
  33. Tsai, C., & Liu, S. (2005). Developing a multi-dimensional instrument for assessing students' epistemological views toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1621-1638. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500206432