산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering)

  • 제39권3호
  • /
  • Pages.64-70
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2005-0461(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7975(eISSN)
한국산업경영시스템학회 (Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Model을 이용한 무기체계 운용화면 GUI 사용성 평가 및 개선에 대한 연구

A Study of Usability Evaluation and Improvement of Weapon System Display GUI Using Performance Model

  • 전동주 (LIG넥스원(주) ILS연구센터) ;
  • 이승률 (LIG넥스원(주) ILS연구센터) ;
  • 최영원 (LIG넥스원(주) ILS연구센터) ;
  • 이혜원 (LIG넥스원(주) ILS연구센터) ;
  • 김두정 (LIG넥스원(주) ILS연구센터)
  • Jeon, Dong-Ju (ILS(Integrated Logistics Support) R&D Lab, LIG NEX1., Ltd.) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Ryool (ILS(Integrated Logistics Support) R&D Lab, LIG NEX1., Ltd.) ;
  • Choi, Young-Won (ILS(Integrated Logistics Support) R&D Lab, LIG NEX1., Ltd.) ;
  • Lee, Hye-Won (ILS(Integrated Logistics Support) R&D Lab, LIG NEX1., Ltd.) ;
  • Kim, Doo-Jung (ILS(Integrated Logistics Support) R&D Lab, LIG NEX1., Ltd.)
  • 투고 : 2016.06.07
  • 심사 : 2016.08.26
  • 발행 : 2016.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The recent development of modern weapon system by SOS (System of System) has required users to have more exact decision making. It is possible to achieve the control of complex weapon system more efficiently and effectively by increasing usability. Accordingly, many studies on graphical display have been conducted for several years in the field of HCI (Human Computer Interaction) and GUI (Graphic User Interface), starting from its design stage. Therefore, this paper focuses on evaluating the system GUI usability and analyzing several important points based on performance model, which is a tool for the evaluation and the improvement of service quality. Performance Model, the main focus of this study, reflects user expectations (which is defined as user importance in this paper). The study consists of four steps. First, 34 checklists are drawn from the existing studies related to GUI usability evaluation by using a heuristic method, and then the checklists are matched with 11 weapon system design factors. Next, the study evaluates the importance of GUI element and the usability of weapon system "A" with the checklists twice respectively. Third, the performance of user importance ($P_i$) and the performance of usability ($P_u$) are calculated by modifying a numerical formula for normalization in this step. Finally, the study compares the approach it takes and the existing usability evaluation method, demonstrating that there is a significant difference between the two methods as a result. In addition, 4 improvement factors are suggested for weapon system "A" as "Shortcut" and "Description of Abbreviation," and so on. Although it is necessary to conduct more studies for higher reliability and validity of the results, this study is meaningful considering it takes a new point of view.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Asil, O., Zhenyu, J.K., and Ozgur, U., UseLearn : A novel checklist and usability evaluation method for e- Learning systems by criticality metric analysis, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2010, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 455-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2010.04.001
  2. Chen, S.C., Yang, C.C., Lin, W.T., Yeh, T.M., and Lin, Y.S., Construction of key model for knowledge management system using AHP-QFD for semiconductor industry in Taiwan, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 2007, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 576-598.
  3. Chen, S.H., Performance evaluation for introducing statistical process control to the liquid crystal display industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008, pp. 80-92.
  4. Chen, S.H., Yang, C.C., Lin, W.T., and Yeh, T.M., Service Quality attributes determine improvement priority, The TQM Magazine, 2007, Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780710730005
  5. Hong, J.W., Jeon, D.U., and Lee, H.S., The Analysis of Priority on Advanced IT System Using the Performance Model relationship between the Level of B2B Collaboration and Small & Medium-Sized Collaborative Enterprise, IE Interfaces, 2012, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 64-70. https://doi.org/10.7232/IEIF.2012.25.1.064
  6. Hsia, T.C. and Pu, L.B., Using TRIZ to improve maintenance and repair services at Jung-Xian Auto Repair, Advances in information Sciences and Service Sciences, 2013, Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 409-419. https://doi.org/10.4156/aiss.vol5.issue9.49
  7. Hung, Y.H., Huang, M.L., and Chen, K.S., Service Quality evaluation by service quality performance matrix, Total Quality Management, 2003, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360309706
  8. Kim, D.H., Hong, J.W., Lee, E.H., and Kwon, Y.J., Study of Factor Standardization on Weapon System Display, Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers Conference, 2015, pp. 401-408.
  9. Kim, D.J., Lee, H.W., Jeong, J.H., and Yong, H.Y., Usability Evaluation Criteria of Software GUI on Weapon System, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 2015, Vol. 16, No. 12, pp. 8691-8699. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.12.8691
  10. Kim, H.S., Systematical S/W Development Cost Estimation of Weapon System, Defense and Industry, 2002, pp. 46-55.
  11. Kim, P.S., Lee, J.H., and Kim, T.H., An Analysis on Improvement of Teaching Environment and Educational Service Quality with the Performance Model, Proceedings of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering Conference, 2009, pp. 195-202.
  12. Kwak, S.J. and Bae, K.J., An Experimental Study on the Usability Test for the E-Book Reader, Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 2011, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 31-0333. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.031
  13. Laurie, P.D. and Maxine S.C., An Adaptable Usability Heuristic Checklist for Online Courses, 35th ASEE/ IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2005, pp. 6-11.
  14. Lee, J.H., Hong, S.K., and Song, K.H., A Case Study on the Concept of the Operational Requirements Document Required in Defense Acquisition and its Applications, Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, pp. 235-239.
  15. Nielsen, J., Usability Engineering, San FranCisco, USA : Morgan Kaufmann, 1994.
  16. Park, J.H., Han, S.H., Park, J.H., Park, W.K., Kim, H.K., and Hong, S.W., Comparison of Usability Evaluation Methods for Mobile Application, Proceedings of Ergonomics Society of Korea, 2012, pp. 154-157.
  17. Smith, M. and Wickens, C.D., The Effects of Display Highlighting and Event History on Operator Decision Making in National Missile Defense System Application, Technical Report ARL-99-7/FED-LAB-99-4, 1999.
  18. Song, H.G. and Lim, S.U., Prioritizing quality attributes using I-S Gap analysis, Journal of Korean Society of Quality Management, 2015, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 127-140. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2015.43.2.127
  19. Yeo, H.L., Kim, P.S., and Kim, T.H., Analysis on the Improvement of Ski Resort Service Quality with the Performance Model, Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2010, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 59-70.