DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

육계로부터 분리한 병원성 세균에 대한 봉독의 항균효과

Antibacterial effects of purified bee venom against some pathogenic bacteria isolated from dead chickens

  • 한상미 (국립농업과학원 농업생물부) ;
  • 김세건 (국립농업과학원 농업생물부) ;
  • 홍인표 (국립농업과학원 농업생물부) ;
  • 우순옥 (국립농업과학원 농업생물부) ;
  • 장혜리 (국립농업과학원 농업생물부) ;
  • 이경우 (건국대학교 동물자원과학과)
  • Han, Sang Mi (Department of Agricultural Biology, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Se Gun (Department of Agricultural Biology, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Hong, In Phyo (Department of Agricultural Biology, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Woo, Soon Ok (Department of Agricultural Biology, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Jang, Hye Ri (Department of Agricultural Biology, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Kyung Woo (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University)
  • 투고 : 2016.08.18
  • 심사 : 2016.09.30
  • 발행 : 2016.09.30

초록

Clostridium perfringens, Salmonella thyphimurium and S. Montevideo isolated from the intestines of dead broiler chickens in Korea were tested for antibacterial effects to purifed bee venom. Purified bee venom from Apis mellifera L. has been used as natural antimicrobial compounds in pigs, cows, dairy cattle and chicken farms in Korea. To investigate antibacterial effect of purified bee venom was evaluated by agar well diffusion method, minimum inhibitory concentraion (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), and postantibiotic effect (PAE). Purified bee venom exhibited significant inhibition of bacterial growth of C. perfringens, S. thyphimurium and S. Montevideo with MIC value of 0.85, 0.68 and $0.69{\mu}g/mL$, respectively. The MBC value of purified bee venom against C. perfringens, S. thyphimurium and S. Montevideo were 3.33, 2.66 and $2.86{\mu}g/mL$. Furthermore, the results of PAE values against C. perfringens, S. thyphimurium and S. Montevideo showed the bacterial effect with 3.5, 4.0 and 3.5 hr. Stability of pufifed bee venom at acidity from pH 1 to pH 8 for 24 hr was the antibacterial activity for C. perfringens, S. thyphimurium and S. Montevideo and melittin contents. Also purified bee venom processed through the heating for 15 min, there was no signification loss of the antibacterial activity and melittin at below $100^{\circ}C$. These results obtained in this study suggest that purified bee venom might be utilized as a feed additive in poultry diets.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김기석. 2005. 국내 주요 양계질병의 발생현황과 금후 과제. 한국가금학회 심포지움, 77-94.
  2. 이윤경. 2016. 세계 양계산업 동향. 세계농업 185: 1-23.
  3. 조현성. 2015. 2015 육계 산업 동향. 양계동향 01/02: 22-27.
  4. 한상미, 이광길, 여주홍, 우순옥, 권해용. 2007. 봉독 간이정제법. 특허 제 10-0758814호
  5. Boyer CI, Narotsky S, Bruner DW, Brown JA. 1962. Salmonellosis in turkeys and chickens associated with contaminated feed. Avian Dis 6(1): 43-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1588027
  6. Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Serris JC, Turck M. 1966. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Am J Clin Pathol 45: 493-496. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493
  7. Choe CY, Park IJ, Kang M, Jang HK, Hur TY, Jung YH, Cho YL, Do YJ, Yoo JG, Na JC, Jong HB. 2013. Occurrence of Clostridium perfringens according to raising periods in broilers. Korean J poult Sci 40(4): 305-313. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2013.40.4.305
  8. Choi I, Chang HS. 2009. Antimicrobial activity of medicinal herbs against Salmonella gallinarum and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Korean J Poult Sci 36(3): 231-238. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2009.36.3.231
  9. Cooper KK, Gonger JH, Uzal FA. 2013. Diagnosing Clostridial enteric disease in poultry. J Vet Diagn Invest 25: 314-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638713483468
  10. Fennell JF, Shipman WH, Cole LJ. 1967. Antibacterial action of a bee venom fraction (melittin) against a penicillin-resistant Staphylococcus and other microorganisms. Res. Dev Tech Rep 5: 1-13.
  11. Habermann E, Reiz KG. 1965. On the biochemistry of bee venom peptides, melittin and apamin. Biochem Z 343(2): 192-203.
  12. Han SM, Lee KG, Yeo JH, Kweon HY, Kim BS, Kim JY, Baek HJ, Kim ST. 2007. Antibacterial acitivity of the honey bee venom against bacterial mastitis pathogens infecting dariy cows. Int J Indust Entomol 14(2): 137-142.
  13. Han SM, Lee KG, Yeo JH, Hwang SJ, Chenoweth PJ, Pak SC. 2009. Effects of bee venom treatment on growth performance of young pigs. Am J Chin Med 37(2): 833-842.
  14. Han SM, Lee KG, Yeo JH, OH BY, Kim BS, Lee W, Baek HJ, Kim ST, Hwang SJ, Pak SC. 2010a. Effects of honeybee venom supplementation in drinking water on growth performance of broiler chickens. Poult Sci 89: 2396-2400. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00915
  15. Han SM, Lee KG, Yeo JH, Oh BY, Kim ST. 2010b. Effects of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) venom on the reproductive efficiency of dams and the growth performance, disease occurrence of Hanwoo calves. Korean J Vet Serv 33(3): 287-292
  16. Han SM, Hong IP, Woo SO, Kim SG, Jan HR. 2015. Analysis of bee venom residues in milks of dairy cattle using UHPLC with newly developed pre-processing method. Korean J Vet Serv 38(1): 25-30. https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2015.38.1.25
  17. Long, JR, Barnum DA, Pettit JR. 1974. Necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens II. Pathology and proposed pathogenesis. Can J Comp Med 38(4): 467-474.
  18. Lowdin E, Odenholt-Tornqvist I, Bengtsson S, Cars O. 1993. A new method to determine postantibiotic effect and effects of subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37: 2200-2205. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.37.10.2200
  19. Kim AR, Kim JH, Lee YJ, Cho YM, Kwon JH, Kwon YK, Lee YJ, Choi JG, Joh SJ, Kim MC, Lee EK. 2006. The prevalence of pullorum disease-fowl typhoid in grand parent stock and parent stock in Korea. Korea J Vet Res 46(4): 347-353.
  20. Kim JE, Park SK, Kim TW, Mun M, Koh JS, Jeong SK, Kook K. 2010. Effects of feeding fermentation of spent mushroom substrate (FSMS) on growth performance in broiler chicks. Korean J Vet Serv 33(4): 387-392.
  21. Piek T. 1986. Venoms of the Hymenoptera. Academic press, London. United kigdom
  22. Songer JG. 1996. Clostridial enteric diseases of domestic animals. Clin Microbiol Rev (2): 216-234.
  23. Wu M, Hancock RE. 1999. Interaction of the cyclic antimicrobial cationic peptide bactenecin with the outer and cytoplasmic membrane. J Biol Chem 274: 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.1.29