DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Architectural Design of Terminal Operating System for a Container Terminal Based on a New Concept

  • Singgih, Ivan Kristianto (Department of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jin, Xuefeng (Department of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Hong, Soondo (Department of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Kap Hwan (Department of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2015.12.29
  • Accepted : 2016.09.26
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

Automation ensures accurate and well-organized container transportation in container terminals. This paper addresses operational issues such as equipment scheduling and the coordination between various pieces of equipment in a rail-based automated container terminal. Containers are relayed using multiple types of equipment from road trucks to a vessel and vice versa. Therefore, handshaking is required during a container transfer between different pieces of equipment. Synchronization between the schedules of all the equipment is important to reduce equipment waiting times and the time required for transporting containers, which results in a short turnaround time for a vessel. This paper proposes an integrated control system with the objective of synchronizing the operations of different types of equipment, provides a list of decisions to be made by the control module of each type of equipment, and shows all the required information transfers between control modules. A scheme for the integrated scheduling of multiple types of equipment is proposed. The decisions made by each control module in a real-time fashion are listed with detailed explanations, and the information transfer between managers in a real-time situation at the proposed terminal is described.

Keywords

References

  1. Chen, L., Bostel, N., Dejax, P., Cai, J., and Xi, L. (2007), A tabu search algorithm for the integrated scheduling problem of container handling systems in a maritime terminal, European Journal of Operational Research, 181, 40-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.033
  2. Choe, R., Kim, J., and Ryu, K. R. (2015), Online preference learning for adaptive dispatching of AGVs in an automated container terminal, Applied Soft Computing, 38, 647-660.
  3. He, J., Huang, Y., Yan, W., and Wang, S. (2015), Integrated internal truck, yard crane and quay crane scheduling in a container terminal considering energy consumption, Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 2464-2487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.016
  4. Kaveshgar, N. and Huynh, N. (2015), Integrated quay crane and yard truck scheduling for unloading inbound containers, International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 168-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.028
  5. Kim, K. H., Won, S. H., Lim, J. K., and Takahashi, T. (2004), An architectural design of control software for automated container terminals, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 46, 741-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2004.05.007
  6. Lau, H. Y. K. and Zhao, Y. (2008), Integrated scheduling of handling equipment at automated container terminals, International Journal of Production Economics, 112, 665-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.05.015
  7. Lehmann, M., Grunow, M., and Gunther, H. O. (2006), Deadlock handling for real-time control of AGVs at automated container terminals, OR Spectrum, 28, 631-657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-006-0053-4
  8. Michele, A. and Patrizia, S. (2014), Strategic determinants of terminal operating system choice: an empirical approach using multinomial analysis, Transportation Research Procedia, 3, 592-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.038
  9. Moorthy, R. L., Hock-Guan W., Wing-Cheong N., and Chung-Piaw T. (2003), Cyclic deadlock prediction and avoidance for zone-controlled AGV system, International Journal of Production Economics, 83, 309-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00370-5
  10. Murty, K. G., Liu, J., Wan, Y., and Linn, R. (2005), A decision support system for operations in a container terminal, Decision Support Systems, 39, 309-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2003.11.002
  11. Park, T., Choe, R., Ok, S. M., and Ryu, K. R. (2010), Real-time scheduling for twin RMGs in an automated container yard, OR Spectrum, 32, 593-615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-010-0209-0
  12. Petering, M. E. H., Wu, Y., Li, W., Goh, M., and de Souza, R. (2009), Development and simulation analysis of real-time yard crane control systems for seaport container transshipment terminals, OR Spectrum, 31, 801-835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-008-0142-7
  13. Wang, Y. and Kim, K. H. (2011), A quay crane scheduling algorithm considering the workload of yard cranes in the container yard, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22, 459-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0303-9
  14. Won, S. H. and Kim, K. H. (2009), An integrated framework for various operation plans in container terminals, Polish Maritime Research, 3(61), 51-61.

Cited by

  1. Integrated Simulation-Based Optimization of Operational Decisions at Container Terminals vol.14, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/a14020042
  2. Determining the optimal number of yard trucks in smaller container terminals vol.13, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00482-6