디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제14권9호
  • /
  • Pages.123-132
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기업 간 거래에서 고객가치가 거래지속성에 미치는 영향 -거래가치, 관계 가치, 평가적 가치를 중심으로-

The Impact of Customer Value on Relationship Continuity -Focusing on transaction value, relationship value, appraisal value-

  • 김향미 (KT 비서실 그룹경영단) ;
  • 이소영 (호서대학교 벤처대학원 정보경영학과)
  • Kim, Hyang-Mi (Group Relations Unit, CEO office, KT) ;
  • Lee, So-Young (Dept. of Information Management, Hoseo Graduate School of Venture)
  • 투고 : 2016.05.17
  • 심사 : 2016.09.20
  • 발행 : 2016.09.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 "어떤 기업이 거래 상대로서 매력적이지 않음에도 불구하고, 단지 오랜 기간 거래를 했다는 이유로 관계를 지속하는 원인이 무엇일까?" 라는 연구 문제로 출발하였다. 저자들은 이를 고객 가치로 설명하였으며, 고객 가치를 B2B 거래 관계의 스펙트럼 안에서 거래 가치, 관계 가치, 평가적 가치라는 세 가지 유형으로 구분하여, 거래 지속의도에 미치는 영향에 대해 실증분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 기업 간 거래를 유지하는데 있어, 거래 가치 혹은 관계 가치라는 양자택일적인 가치 판단이 이루어지는 것이 아니라, 거래를 지속할 것인지 말 것인지에 관한 의사결정은 거래 가치와 관계 가치를 토대로 평가적인 측면에서 이루어진다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 즉, 기존 연구가 거래 가치 혹은 관계 가치라는 한 측면에서 거래의 지속성을 다루었다면, 본 연구는 이들을 동시에 고려하였다는 점에서 그 의의를 갖는다고 할 수 있다.

This study starts from the research question that "Why some companies decide to keep working in partnership even when they are not satisfied with the partner companies simply because they are old business partners." The authors try to find the answer in terms of customer value considering the phases of B2B transaction spectrum: transaction value, relationship value and appraisal value implementing empirical research. The result shows that the intension to retain the relation with an existing partner is formed by the trade-off between the benefit and cost of both contract value and relationship value and not the sole value was dominant. The unique point of the study is that current study is considering these two factors as dependent variables which affect the relationship continuity which is not the case in existing researches.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. S. K. Oh and K. I. Han, "The effects of the marketing communication and the trust on long-term relationship orientation B2B industrial product market," Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 81-90, 2012.
  2. D. Grewal, K. B Monroe and R. Krishnan, "The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions," The Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 46-59, 1998.
  3. K. B. Monroe and J. D. Chapman, "Framing effects on buyers subjective product evaluations," in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 14, Melanie Wallendorf and Paul Anderson, eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 193-197, 1997.
  4. R. H. Thaler, "Mental accounting and consumer choice," Marketing Science, Vol.4 No. Summer, pp. 199-214, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199
  5. J. E. Urbany and W. O. Bearden, "Reference price effects on perceptions of perceived offer value, normal prices, and transaction utility," in Enhancing Knowledge Development in Marketing, Paul Bloom et al., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp. 45-49, 1989.
  6. V. A. Zeithaml, "Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 2-22, 1988. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446
  7. L. Krishnamurhi, T. Mazumdar and S. P Raj, "Asymmetric response to price in consumer brand choice and purchase quantity decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 387-400, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1086/209309
  8. K. E. K. Möller and P. Torronen, "Business suppliers' value creation potential: A capability-based analysis," Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 109-118, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(02)00225-0
  9. A. Sharland, "Sourcing strategy: the impact of costs on relationship outcomes," International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 27, No. 7, pp. 395-409, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039710188468
  10. D. B. Grisaffe, and A. Kumar, "Antecedents and consequences of customer value: testing an expanded framework," REPORT-MARKETING SCIENCE INSTITUTE CAMBRIDGE MASSACHUSETTS, pp. 21-22, 1999.
  11. J. E. Hogan, "Assessing relationship value in business markets", University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1999.
  12. L. Lapierre, "Customer-perceived value in industrial contexts," Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, Vol. 15, No. 2/3, pp. 122-140, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620010316831
  13. J. P. Cannon and C. Homburg, "Buyer-seller relationships and customer firm costs," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp.29-43, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.1.29.18136
  14. W. Ulaga and S. Chacour, "Measuring customerperceived value in business markets. a prerequisite for marketing strategy development and implementation," Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 525-540, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00122-4
  15. A. Eggert and W. Ulaga, "Customer perceived value - a substitute for satisfaction in business markets," Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, Vol. 17, No. 2/3, pp. 107-118, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620210419754
  16. T. Gao, J. Sirgy, and M. Bird. "Enriching customer value research with a relational perspective: evidence from an empirical investigation of organizational buyers' value perceptions," Journal of Relationship Marketing, Vol. 4, No. 1/2, pp. 21-42, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1300/J366v04n01_03
  17. A. Walter and T. Ritter, "The influence of adaptations, trust, and commitment on value-creating functions of customer relationships," Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 4/5, pp. 353-365, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620310480250
  18. A. H. Liu, M. P. Leach, and K. L. Bernhardt. "Examining customer value perceptions of organizational buyers when sourcing from multiple vendors," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 559-568, 2005.
  19. W. Ulaga and A. Eggert "Relationship value in business markets: the construct its dimensions," Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 73-99, 2005.
  20. A. H. Liu, "Customer value and switching costs in business services: developing exit barriers through strategic value management," Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 30-37, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620610643157
  21. W. Ulaga and S. Chacour, "Measuring customer-perceived value in business markets: a prerequisite for marketing strategy development and implementation," Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 525-540, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00122-4
  22. W. Ulaga and A. Eggert. "Value-based differentiation in business relationships: gaining and sustaining key supplier status," Journal of Marketing Vol. 70, No.1 pp. 119-136, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2006.70.1.119
  23. J. Barry, and T. S. Terry, "Empirical study of relationship value in industrial services," Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 228-241, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620810865807
  24. W. Ulaga, "Capturing value creation in business relationships: a customer perspective," Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 677-93, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.06.008
  25. A. Ravald and C. Gronroos, "The value concept and relationship marketing," European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 19-30, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569610106626
  26. R. Normann and R. Ramirez, "Designing interactive strategy: from value chain to value constellation", Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1994.
  27. L. Leonidou, "Industrial manufacturer-customer relationships: the discriminant role of the buying Situation," Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 33, No. 8, pp. 238-253, 2004.
  28. J. C. Anderson and J. A. Narus, "Business Market Management", Prentice-Hall, NJ., 1999.
  29. J. C. Anderson and J. A. Narus, "A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 42-58, 1990. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252172
  30. O. E. Williamson, "The Economic Institutions of Capitalism", New York, The Free Press, 1995.
  31. G. C. Homans, "Social behavior as exchange," American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 597-606, 1959. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
  32. E. K. Clemons, S. P. Reddi, and M. C. Row, "The impact of information technology on the oganization of economic activity: the move to the middle hypothesis," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 9-35, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1993.11517998
  33. J. B. Heide and A. M. Weiss, "Vendor consideration and switching behavior for buyers in high-technology markets," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 30-43, 1995. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252117
  34. P. M. Blua, "Exhcange and power in social life", New York and London, Transaction Publishers, 1964.
  35. H. K. Kim, S. H. Lee, and J. H. Song, "A study on construct and consequence of relationship quality in B2B," Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 155-168, 2010.
  36. R. P. Bagozzi and Y. J. Yi, "On the evaluation of structural equation models," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.16, No.1, pp. 74-94, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  37. C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, "Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No.3, pp. 382-388, 1981. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
  38. M. E. Sobel, "Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models", In S. Leinhart(Ed.). Sociological methodology, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982.
  39. W. W. Chin, "The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling", G. Marcoulides (ed), Erlbaum Associates, 1998.
  40. J. Cohen, "Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences", (2nd ed), Lawrence Erlabaum Associates, 1988.