DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Constitutional Legitimacy of the Maritime Cadet Training System : Justifiable Restrictions on the Cadet's Fundamental Rights at the College of Maritime Science of the KMOU

해사대학 승선생활교육의 헌법상 기본권제한에 관한 연구 - 한국해양대학교 해사대학을 중심으로 -

  • Lee, Sang-Il (Department of Ship Operation, Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Yoo, Jin-Ho (Korean Register of Shipping) ;
  • Choi, Jung-Hwan (Department of Maritime Administration, Korea Maritime and Ocean University)
  • 이상일 (한국해양대학교 해사대학 선박운항과) ;
  • 유진호 (한국선급) ;
  • 최정환 (한국해양대학교 해양정책학과)
  • Received : 2016.08.04
  • Accepted : 2016.08.29
  • Published : 2016.08.31

Abstract

This paper involves the constitutionality of the restrictive by-laws established by the 'College of Maritime Science' at the 'Korea Maritime and Ocean University' when they affect the cadet's fundamental rights, particularly, in connection with the training system of the 'Merchant Cadet Dormitory.' The issue in question is whether the school regulations may fall within a judicially permissible boundary in light of the general principles of constitutional rights in that the rules are enacted by the school itself in accordance with the Article 31, Section 4 of the Constitution and largely regulate the cadets' living conditions on a campus. However, the general scrutiny standard the courts apply requires the school enactments to pass three tests to be justified: (1) legislative authorization, (2) proportionality and (3) non-infringement on the essential elements of the fundamental rights as articulated under Article 37, Section 2 of the Constitution. The review in this paper shows that, first, the by-laws at issue find themselves statutorily authorized by the 'Higher Education Act' and the 'Decree of the Establishment of National Schools', with the proportionality as a second part observed within a justifiable scope and the essential elements of the fundamental rights as the third point not being marred. In conclusion, the school's dormitory training system is not found to cross the line and, however, the school authorities still need to keep overseeing the overall training course to secure the constitutional proportionality.

본 연구에서는 해사대학의 학칙에 근거한 승선생활교육이 학생의 기본권을 제한하게 되는 경우, 그 제한이 헌법상 기본권 제한에 관한 일반원칙의 테두리 내에서 이루어지고 있는지 여부를 연구하고자 하였다. 해사대학은 헌법 제31조 제4항에 근거하여 자율적으로 학칙을 제정하여 학생을 규율하고 있다. 하지만, 학생의 기본권을 제한하기 위해서는 기본권 제한 3단계인 (1)법적 근거가 있어야 하며, (2)비례성원칙을 통과하고, (3)헌법 제37조 제2항에 따른 본질내용을 침해하지 않아야 한다. 이 논문에서 검토결과 첫째, 법적근거는 고등교육법과 국립학교설치령 및 학칙에 근거하고 있다. 둘째, 헌법의 비례성원칙을 위반한 것으로는 보이지 않으며, 셋째, 기본권제한의 한계인 본질내용의 침해가 없는 것을 확인하였다. 즉 해사대학생에 대한 승선생활교육이 헌법상 보장하고 있는 기본권 침해는 없는 것으로 확인되었다. 다만, 승선생활교육을 시행하는 과정에서 비례성원칙의 한계를 넘지 않도록 감독을 강화하고, 개별학생의 일탈이 발생하지 않도록 지도 감독을 철저히 해야 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, Y. K.(2004), A Study of University Regulations Vol. 5, No. 1, p. 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 317, 318, 319, 320, 322.
  2. Cho, S. H.(2002), School and Educational Law, p. 150.
  3. Choi, S. H.(1996), Legal Status and Control of State for University Regulations, Journal of Law of Seoul National University, Vol. 37. No. 1, p. 59.
  4. Han, C. L.(1997), Restriction and Limitation of Constitutional rights, Journal of Law of Chosen University Vol. 3, p. 122.
  5. Hong, J. S.(1986), A study on the Legal Status of College Students, The Journal of Educational Law, Vol. 1, p. 123, 126, 127.
  6. Hong, J. S.(2016), Administrative Law 24 ed., p. 138.
  7. Kaneko(1978), Law of Education (Compilation), YUHIKAKU, p. 216.
  8. Kim, C. S.(2013), Constitutional Law 21 ed., pp. 370-371, p. 346, 395.
  9. Kim, C. Y.(2001), Administrative Law, p. 130.
  10. Kim, H. J.(2008), The Legal character and Purview of University Regulations, The journal of Law of Korea Foreign language Uni., Vol. 29. p. 264.
  11. Kim, N. H.(1974), Management of organizational behavior, p. 241.
  12. Ko, J.(1999), Fundamental human rights and Assignment according to school regulations, Journal of the Korean Society of educational law, Vol. 11, No. 11, p. 31.
  13. Kwon, Y. S.(2010), Constitutional Law, p. 346, 350, 347, 356.
  14. Lee, J. I.(2009), The new configuration of logical system for Human rights, Journal of Judicial Examination Vol. 54, No. 4, p. 14, 15.
  15. Lee, K. U.(2004), Legal Status and Incorporation of National Universities, The Journal of educational law Vol. 16, No. 2, p. 166.
  16. Lee, S. N.(1982), Personality and Teaching behavior, pp. 15-16.
  17. Nishihara Kan'ichi(1973), Law of Commercial Activities, Compilation of Legal Studies, YUHIKAKU, p. 49.
  18. Oh, C. S.(1987), Philosophy of Education, pp. 172-173.
  19. Otto Mayer, Deutsches Verwaltungsrecht, Bd. I, 1985.
  20. Pyo, S. Y.(1997), Major issues in special legislation of education regarding dispute settlement Vol. 3, The Journal of educational law, p. 137.
  21. Seung, N. I.(2016), Constitutional Law 16 ed., p. 952, 975.

Cited by

  1. Korean Maritime Cadets’ Onboard Training Environment Survey vol.13, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084161