한국산학기술학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)

  • 제17권7호
  • /
  • Pages.192-203
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1975-4701(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4688(eISSN)
한국산학기술학회 (The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

과업갈등이 직무태도에 미치는 영향 : 커뮤니케이션 만족의 매개효과

The Effect of Task-Conflict on Job Attitudes : The Mediating Effects of Communication

  • Jeong, Hyeon-Dal (School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Baek, Yoon-Jung (School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2016.04.06
  • 심사 : 2016.07.07
  • 발행 : 2016.07.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 개인차원에서 과업갈등과 직무태도 간의 관계에서 커뮤니케이션 만족의 매개효과를 밝히고자 하였다. 최근 급변하는 경쟁 환경과 다양해지는 인력다양성 상황에서 커뮤니케이션의 중요성은 날로 증대되고 있다. 조직 내에서 발생되는 커뮤니케이션에 대한 관심과 중요성 인식으로 인해 관련 연구가 활발히 진행되고 있다. 하지만 커뮤니케이션의 유형을 구분하여 커뮤니케이션의 긍정적인 메커니즘을 차별적으로 분석한 연구는 부족한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 조직 내 커뮤니케이션의 대표적인 유형인 상사와의 커뮤니케이션과 동료와의 커뮤니케이션으로 구분하여 변수들 간의 관계를 살펴보고자 하였다. 다양화된 인적구성은 조직에 긍정적인 영향을 미치기도 하지만 대표적으로 갈등을 유발하는 요인으로 작용한다. 과업갈등의 경우 구성원들 간에 업무수행 과정에서 필연적으로 수반된다. 과업갈등의 경우 선행연구들에서 지속적으로 부정적인 영향력을 미치고 있으므로 조직관리적 측면에서 이를 제거하거나 감소시키기 위한 방안을 모색해야 한다. 과업을 수행하거나 과업 수행 중에 발생하는 갈등의 상황에서 구성원들은 자연스럽게 커뮤니케이션 과정을 거치게 된다. 이런 과정 속에서 만족감을 인식한다면 과업갈등의 부정적 영향력을 감소시킬 수 있을 것이다. 이를 규명하기 위해서 국내기업에 종사하는 280명의 조직구성원들을 대상으로 구조방정식모형(SEM)을 통해 가설을 검증하였다. 분석을 위해 SPSS 21.0 & AMOS 21.0 통계 패키지를 활용하였으며, 2개 이상의 매개효과를 효율적으로 검증하기 위해 팬텀변수를 활용한 다중매개효과 분석을 사용하였다. 분석결과 과업갈등은 직무태도에 부정적인 영향을 미쳤으며 상사소통의 매개효과가 검증되었다. 분석결과를 바탕으로 연구의 시사점과 향후 연구방향을 모색하였다.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of task conflict on job attitudes (organizational commitment & job satisfaction), focusing on the mediating effects of supervisory communication & co-worker communication. Recently, the importance of communication as a research topic has been increasing. According to prior research, communication satisfaction has a positive effect on job performance. However, studies which take into account the different types of communication are lacking. Therefore, this study considered two types of communication (supervisory communication and coworker communication). A research model and hypotheses were developed in order to examine the theoretical research issues and questions. The sample consisted of 280 survey data drawn from employees in firms located in Korea. The data was analyzed by the statistical packages, SPSS 21.0 & AMOS 21.0 for Windows. The findings of the analysis are as follows. Firstly, it was found that task conflict had a negative (-) effect on organizational commitment & job satisfaction. Therefore, H1a & H1b are supported. Secondly, it was found that task conflict had a negative (-) effect on supervisory communication. Therefore, H2a is supported. However, it did not have a significant effect on co-worker communication. Hence, H2b is not supported. Thirdly, as regards the mediating effect of supervisory communication, it was found that supervisory communication mediated the effect of task conflict on job attitudes (organizational commitment & job satisfaction). Therefore, H3a & H3b are supported. Finally, the mediating effect of co-worker communication was not significant. Therefore, none of the sub-hypotheses of H4 are supported. Based on these findings, this study suggested directions for future research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. D. W. Eom, J. E. Ye, S. H. Kwon, & J. B. Wi. Suggestions for communication activation within the organization. Samsung Economic Research Institute, CEO Information, 795, 1-21, 2011.
  2. J. Gray, & H. Laidlaw. Improving the measurement of communication satisfaction. Management Communication Quarterly, 17(3), pp. 425-448, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318903257980
  3. V. Mark, D. T. Menno, & R. S. Erwin. Direct and indirect effects of supervisor communication on organizational commitment. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12(2), pp. 116-128, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13563280710744801
  4. E. Y. Yu, B. H. Chang, & S. H. Nam. A Study on the Effects of Organizational Communication Satisfaction on Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, Customer Orientation : Focusing on University Employees. Speech & Communication , 12, 68-105, 2009.
  5. C. K. Lee, & S. R. Choi. The Effect of Organizational Structure and Job Characteristics on Organizational Efficiency:A Focus on the Mediation of Horizontal and Vertical Communications. Korean Institute of Public Affairs, 50(2), pp. 65-88, 2012.
  6. Y. T. Sung. The Mediating Effect of Communication in the Impact of Police officers Emotional Labor on Stress. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 16(4), pp. 187-206, 2013.
  7. J. E. Lim. A Study on Organizational Communication of Hotel and Its Effect on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Identification. Korean Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 21(5), pp. 1-20, 2012.
  8. G. D. Lee. An Empirical Study on the Effects of the Relationships among Strategy, Talent Management and Performance in Small Business. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 24(4), pp. 2541-2564, 2011.
  9. K. A. Jehn, G. Northcraft, & M. Neale. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), pp. 741-763, 1999. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2667054
  10. J. H. Lee, J. K. Lee, H. S. Kim, & J. H. Park. The Effects of R&D Team's Diversity and Cohesion on Team Creativity: The Moderating Effect of Leader's Function as a Creative Role Model. Journal of Organization and Management, 35(3), pp. 171-197, 2011.
  11. R. J. Ely. A field study of group diversity, participation in diversity education programs, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(6), pp. 755-780, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.268
  12. J. S. Leonard, D. I. Levine, & A. Joshi. Do birds of a feather shop together? The effects on performance of employees' similarity with one another and with customers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(6), pp. 731-754, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.267
  13. R. L. Priem, & K. H. Price. Process and outcome expectations for the dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus techniques of strategic decision making. Group Organization Management, 16(2), pp. 206-225, 1991. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105960119101600207
  14. M. K. Jeon, J. H. Kim, G. H. Han, & I. S. Namgung. The Effect of Conflict in Organization on the Job Attitude of Organizational Members. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 19(1), pp. 159-180, 2006.
  15. C. K. W. De Dreu, & L. R. Weingart. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), pp. 741-749, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
  16. H. D. Jeong, & Y. J. Baek. Research Trends in Interpersonal-conflict(Task-conflict & Relationship-conflict) : Literature review & Meta-analysis. Korean Journal of Human Resources Development, 19(1), pp. 109-142, 2016.
  17. J. H. Song, S. H. Kim, & Y. I. Kim. Effects of the hotel staff communication on both group cohesiveness and perceived organizational support as well as customer orientation. Korean Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 23(2), pp. 89-105, 2014.
  18. H. S. Kim, J. H. Lee, & B. S. Bae. The Differential Effect of Task & Relationship Conflict: The Mediating Effect of Relationship Conflict based on the Conflict Transference, and the Moderating Effect of Team-Identification. Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 15(5), pp. 2758-2768, 2014. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.5.2758
  19. F. R. C. de Wit, L. L. Greer, & K. A. Jehn. The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Appled Psychology, 97(2), pp. 360-390, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024844
  20. R. S. Peterson, P. D. Owens, P. E. Tetlock, E. T. Fan, & P. Martorana. Group dynamics in top management teams: Groupthink, vigilance, and alternative models of organizational failure and success. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2/3), pp. 272-305, 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2763
  21. A. C. Amason. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), pp. 123-148, 1996. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256633
  22. K. A. Jehn. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrtive Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282, 1995. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393638
  23. P. J. Hinds, & M. Mortensen. Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science, 16(3), pp. 290-307, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0122
  24. W. B. Swann, J. T. Polzer, D. C. Seyle, & S. J. Ko. Finding value in diversity: Verification of personal and social self-views in diverse groups. Academy of Management Review, 29(1), pp. 9-27, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2004.11851702
  25. C. H. Lu, H. K. Jung, & M. J. Kim. The Moderating Effects of Narcissism and Openness to Experience in the Relationships between Perceived Task Conflict and Job Performance, Organization Citizenship Behaviors and Life Satisfaction. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 28(3), pp. 1065-1086, 2015.
  26. J. H. Lee, & J. H. Park. A study on the Relationship between Intragroup Conflict and Turnover Intentions, and the Mediating Effect of Job Satisfaction: Commonalities and Differences between Korean and Chinese Employees. The Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 24(1), pp. 75-102, 2011. https://doi.org/10.24230/ksiop.24.1.201102.75
  27. M. G. Jeong, & H. S. Choi. The Effects of Task Conflict on Team Effectiveness: A Mediating Role of Team Commitment. Koreanische Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften, 29(4), pp. 97-116, 2011.
  28. M. S. Heo, & M. J. Cheon. An Empirical Study on the Relationships among Conflict between Employees, Authentic Attitude of Knowledge Creation, and Innovative Behaviors. The Knowledge Management Society of Korea, 14(4), pp. 47-74, 2013. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2013.14.4.003
  29. D. C. Hambrick & P. A. Mason. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), pp. 193-206, 1984. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1984.4277628
  30. H. S. Shin. Development of Communication Skill Focused on Case Studies about "Communication and Negotiation class" for a Settlement of Social Conflict. Ratio et Oratio, 2(1), pp. 111-155, 2009.
  31. J. C. Park, & S. I. Chang. A Study on the Effect of Organizational Communication on Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Management Information Systems review, 33(3), pp. 189-208, 2014.
  32. S. J. Hwang. Communication. Bobmunsa, 2006.
  33. J. H. Mo. An empirical study on the effects of leadership and communication on the organizational performance : focusing on the mediating effects of communication. Doctoral Thesis, Yong-in University, 2010.
  34. C. S. Jang, & J. O. Park. Relations Between Communication Satisfaction and Group Creativity in Organization. Management & Information Systems Review, 21, 49-76, 2007.
  35. M. H. Lee, & J. G. Han. Conflict and Team Commitment: Mediating Role of Team Efficacy and Communication Satisfaction. Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 15(5), pp. 2831-2843, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.5.2831
  36. H. S. Choi. The Effect of Task Conflict on Team Commitment and Team Performance: Moderating Effect of Self Efficacy and Team Efficacy. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 25(2), pp. 1019-1039, 2012.
  37. H. J. Bang. The Relationship between Task Conflict and Team Performance : Interaction Effects of Relationship Conflict and Job Demand . Korean Journal of Business Administration, 27(11), pp. 1863-1882, 2014.
  38. J. C. Park, & S. I. Chang. Communication impacts on work related stress and focusing capability : Based in Special Forces Unit. Korean Review of Management Consulting, 4(1), pp. 111-134, 2013.
  39. J. S. Lee. The Relationships among Organization Communication, Organizational Support, Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction in the Hotel F&B Employee. Korea Academic Society Of Tourism Management, 19(1), pp. 35-53, 2004.
  40. R. M. Guzley. Organizational climate and communication climate predictors of commitment to the organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 5(4), pp. 379-402, 1992. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318992005004001
  41. F. Varona. Relationship between communication satisfaction and organizational commitment in three guatemalan organizations. International Journal of Business Communication, 33(2), pp. 111-140, 1996. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002194369603300203
  42. B. Hooff, & J. A. Ridder. Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), pp. 117-130, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673270410567675
  43. W. H. Ock, & S. Y. Kim. A Study on Job Stress and Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment of Local Public Service. Korean Public Administration Review, 35(4), pp. 355-373, 2001.
  44. Y. J. Yang. A study on the effect of organization communication satisfaction on organizational commitment. Doctoral Thesis, Chung-Ang University, 1996.
  45. C. M. Han. A study on career development plan of global enterprise affecting organizational effectiveness and organizational Trust. Doctoral Thesis, Kyunghee University, 2010.
  46. C. W. Downs, & M. D. Hazen. A factor analytic study of communication satisfaction. International Journal of Business Communication, 14(3), pp. 63-73, 1977. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002194367701400306
  47. B. H. Mueller, & J. Lee. Leader-member exchange and organizational communication satisfaction in multiple contexts. International Journal of Business Communication, 39(2), pp. 220-244, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002194360203900204
  48. S. I. Chaiy. Social Science Research Methods. B&M books, 2005.
  49. L. Hu, & P. M. Bentler. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), pp. 1-55, 1999. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  50. B. R. Bae. Structural equation modeling with Amos 21. CHUNGRAM Publishing, 2014.
  51. R. M. Baron, & D. A. Kenny. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp. 1173-1182, 1986. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  52. M. E. Sobel. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312, 1982. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/270723
  53. K. J. Preacher, & A. F. Hayes. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumets, & Computers, 36(4), pp. 717-731, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10. 3758/ BF03206553 https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
  54. P. M. Podsakoff, & D. W. Organ. Self reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), pp. 531-544, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
  55. C. Orpen. The interactive effects of communication quality and job involvement on managerial job satisfaction and work motivatio. The Journal of Psychology, 131(5), pp. 519-522, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989709603540