Korean Journal of Radiology

The Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Virtual Non-Contrast CT Using Dual-Energy Spectral CT: Feasibility of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring

  • Song, Inyoung (Department of Radiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yi, Jeong Geun (Department of Radiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jeong Hee (Department of Radiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sung Mok (Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Kyung Soo (Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Myung Jin (Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2015.09.02
  • Accepted : 2016.02.03
  • Published : 2016.06.01
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of coronary artery calcium scoring based on three virtual noncontrast-enhanced (VNC) images derived from single-source spectral dual-energy CT (DECT) as compared with true noncontrast-enhanced (TNC) images. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted with the approval of our Institutional Review Board. Ninety-seven patients underwent noncontrast CT followed by contrast-enhanced chest CT using single-source spectral DECT. Iodine eliminated VNC images were reconstructed using two kinds of 2-material decomposition algorithms (material density iodine-water pair [MDW], material density iodine-calcium pair [MDC]) and a material suppressed algorithm (material suppressed iodine [MSI]). Two readers independently quantified calcium on VNC and TNC images. The Spearman correlation coefficient test and Bland-Altman method were used for statistical analyses. Results: Coronary artery calcium scores from all three VNC images showed excellent correlation with those from the TNC images (Spearman's correlation coefficient [${\rho}$] = 0.94, 0.88, and 0.89 for MDW, MDC, and MSI, respectively; p < 0.001 for all pairs). Measured coronary calcium volumes from VNC images also correlated well with those from TNC images (${\rho}$ = 0.92, 0.87, and 0.91 for MDW, MDC, and MSI, respectively; p < 0.001 for all pairs). Among the three VNC images, coronary calcium from MDW correlated best with that from TNC. The coronary artery calcium scores and volumes were significantly lower from the VNC images than from the TNC images (p < 0.001 for all pairs). Conclusion: The use of VNC images from contrast-enhanced CT using dual-energy material decomposition/suppression is feasible for coronary calcium scoring. The absolute value from VNC tends to be smaller than that from TNC.

Keywords

References

  1. Polonsky TS, McClelland RL, Jorgensen NW, Bild DE, Burke GL, Guerci AD, et al. Coronary artery calcium score and risk classification for coronary heart disease prediction. JAMA 2010;303:1610-1616 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.461
  2. Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Liu ST, Weinstein SR, Mosler TP, Tseng PH, et al. Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1860-1870 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.079
  3. Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 2004;291:210-215 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.2.210
  4. Wexler L, Brundage B, Crouse J, Detrano R, Fuster V, Maddahi J, et al. Coronary artery calcification: pathophysiology, epidemiology, imaging methods, and clinical implications. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group. Circulation 1996;94:1175-1192 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.94.5.1175
  5. Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH, Budoff MJ, Eisenberg MJ, Grundy SM, et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography) developed in collaboration with the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:378-402 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.001
  6. Mylonas I, Alam M, Amily N, Small G, Chen L, Yam Y, et al. Quantifying coronary artery calcification from a contrastenhanced cardiac computed tomography angiography study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:210-215 https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet144
  7. Otton JM, Lonborg JT, Boshell D, Feneley M, Hayen A, Sammel N, et al. A method for coronary artery calcium scoring using contrast-enhanced computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012;6:37-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2011.11.004
  8. van der Bijl N, Joemai RM, Geleijns J, Bax JJ, Schuijf JD, de Roos A, et al. Assessment of Agatston coronary artery calcium score using contrast-enhanced CT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:1299-1305 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3734
  9. Glodny B, Helmel B, Trieb T, Schenk C, Taferner B, Unterholzner V, et al. A method for calcium quantification by means of CT coronary angiography using 64-multidetector CT: very high correlation with Agatston and volume scores. Eur Radiol 2009;19:1661-1668 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1345-2
  10. Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Boll DT, Paulson EK, Ho LM, Neville AM, et al. Dual-energy multidetector CT: how does it work, what can it tell us, and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging? Radiographics 2010;30:1037-1055 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.304095175
  11. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, Petersilka M, Gruber K, Suss C, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 2006;16:256-268 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2919-2
  12. Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, Grasruck M, Bruder H, Morhard D, et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1510-1517 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0517-6
  13. Graser A, Johnson TR, Hecht EM, Becker CR, Leidecker C, Staehler M, et al. Dual-energy CT in patients suspected of having renal masses: can virtual nonenhanced images replace true nonenhanced images? Radiology 2009;252:433-440 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2522080557
  14. Brown CL, Hartman RP, Dzyubak OP, Takahashi N, Kawashima A, McCollough CH, et al. Dual-energy CT iodine overlay technique for characterization of renal masses as cyst or solid: a phantom feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2009;19:1289-1295 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1273-6
  15. Zou Y, Silver MD. Analysis of fast kV-switching in dual energy CT using a pre-reconstruction decomposition technique. Proc SPIE 2008 March 18 [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.772826
  16. Mendonca PR, Bhotika R, Maddah M, Thomsen B, Dutta S, Licato PE, et al. Multi-material decomposition of spectral CT images. Proc SPIE Med Imaging: Phys Med Imaging 2010;7622:76 221W1-76 221W9
  17. Yamak D, Pavlicek W, Boltz T, Panse PM, Frakes D, Akay M. Coronary calcium quantification using contrast-enhanced dual-energy computed tomography scans. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2013;14:4014
  18. Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Okamura T, Yamada M, Tanami Y, Abe T, et al. Feasibility of coronary artery calcium scoring on virtual unenhanced images derived from single-source fast kVp-switching dual-energy coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2014;8:391-400 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2014.08.005
  19. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:827-832 https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-T
  20. Callister TQ, Cooil B, Raya SP, Lippolis NJ, Russo DJ, Raggi P. Coronary artery disease: improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method. Radiology 1998;208:807-814 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.208.3.9722864
  21. Shemesh J, Henschke CI, Shaham D, Yip R, Farooqi AO, Cham MD, et al. Ordinal scoring of coronary artery calcifications on low-dose CT scans of the chest is predictive of death from cardiovascular disease. Radiology 2010;257:541-548 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100383
  22. Jacobs PC, Gondrie MJ, Mali WP, Oen AL, Prokop M, Grobbee DE, et al. Unrequested information from routine diagnostic chest CT predicts future cardiovascular events. Eur Radiol 2011;21:1577-1585 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2112-8
  23. Budoff MJ, Nasir K, Kinney GL, Hokanson JE, Barr RG, Steiner R, et al. Coronary artery and thoracic calcium on noncontrast thoracic CT scans: comparison of ungated and gated examinations in patients from the COPD Gene cohort. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011;5:113-118 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2010.11.002
  24. Jacobs PC, Isgum I, Gondrie MJ, Mali WP, van Ginneken B, Prokop M, et al. Coronary artery calcification scoring in low-dose ungated CT screening for lung cancer: interscan agreement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1244-1249 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3047
  25. Einstein AJ, Johnson LL, Bokhari S, Son J, Thompson RC, Bateman TM, et al. Agreement of visual estimation of coronary artery calcium from low-dose CT attenuation correction scans in hybrid PET/CT and SPECT/CT with standard Agatston score. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1914-1921 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.057
  26. Wu MT, Yang P, Huang YL, Chen JS, Chuo CC, Yeh C, et al. Coronary arterial calcification on low-dose ungated MDCT for lung cancer screening: concordance study with dedicated cardiac CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:923-928 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2974
  27. Kim SM, Chung MJ, Lee KS, Choe YH, Yi CA, Choe BK. Coronary calcium screening using low-dose lung cancer screening: effectiveness of MDCT with retrospective reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:917-922 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2979
  28. Schwarz F, Nance JW Jr, Ruzsics B, Bastarrika G, Sterzik A, Schoepf UJ. Quantification of coronary artery calcium on the basis of dual-energy coronary CT angiography. Radiology 2012;264:700-707 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112455
  29. Brown SJ, Hayball MP, Coulden RA. Impact of motion artefact on the measurement of coronary calcium score. Br J Radiol 2000;73:956-962 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.73.873.11064648

Cited by

  1. Submillisievert coronary calcium quantification using model-based iterative reconstruction: A within-patient analysis vol.85, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.028
  2. Update on Cardiovascular Applications of Multienergy CT vol.37, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017170100
  3. 전산화단층영상검사에서 단일에너지와 이중에너지를 이용한 뼈 부피측정의 비교 vol.40, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17946/jrst.2017.40.2.10
  4. Optimal Monochromatic Imaging of Spectral Computed Tomography Potentially Improves the Quality of Hepatic Vascular Imaging vol.19, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.578
  5. Improved Calcium Scoring at Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Angiography Using a High-Z Contrast Element and Novel Material Separation Technique vol.42, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000000676
  6. Imaging Cardiovascular Calcification vol.7, pp.13, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.118.008564
  7. Coronary artery calcium quantification using contrast-enhanced dual-energy computed tomography scans in comparison with unenhanced single-energy scans vol.63, pp.17, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aad9be
  8. Accuracy of Calcium Scoring calculated from contrast-enhanced Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography using a dual-layer spectral CT: A comparison of Calcium Scoring from real and virtual non-contras vol.13, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208588
  9. A Glimpse on Trends and Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in the Korean Journal of Radiology vol.20, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0928
  10. CAMPO Precision128 Max ENERGY Spectrum CT Combined with Multiple Parameters to Evaluate the Benign and Malignant Pleural Effusion vol.2021, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5526977
  11. Feasibility of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring on Dual-Energy Chest Computed Tomography: A Prospective Comparison with Electrocardiogram-Gated Calcium Score Computed Tomography vol.10, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040653
  12. Technical Note: Using virtual noncontrast images from dual‐energy CT to eliminate the need of precontrast CT for x‐ray radiation treatment planning of abdominal tumors † vol.48, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14702
  13. Could both intrinsic and extrinsic iodine be successfully suppressed on virtual non-contrast CT images for detecting thyroid calcification? vol.39, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01095-8
  14. Feasibility study of using virtual non-contrast images derived from dual-energy CT to replace true non-contrast images in patients diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma vol.29, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3233/xst-210884
  15. Utility of material-specific fat images derived from rapid-kVp-switch dual-energy renal mass CT for diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma vol.62, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185120959819
  16. Design and implementation of a practical quality control program for dual‐energy CT vol.22, pp.10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13396
  17. Virtual monochromatic imaging reduces beam hardening artefacts in cardiac interior photon counting computed tomography: a phantom study with cadaveric specimens vol.8, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ac4397