DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Reducing Abdominal Compression during Prone CT Colonography on Ascending Colonic Rotation during Supine-to-Prone Positional Change

  • Jang, Jong Keon (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Park, Seong Ho (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Jong Seok (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Hyun Jin (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Ah Young (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Ha, Hyun Kwon (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
  • Received : 2015.08.06
  • Accepted : 2015.11.06
  • Published : 2016.02.01

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of reduced abdominal compression in prone position on ascending colonic movement during supine-to-prone positional change during CT colonography (CTC). Materials and Methods: Eighteen consecutive patients who had undergone prone CTC scanning with cushion blocks placed under the chest and hip/thigh to reduce abdominal compression and had confirmed sessile polyps ${\geq}6mm$ in the well-distended, straight, mid-ascending colon, were included. Radial location along the ascending colonic luminal circumference ($^{\circ}$) was measured for 24 polyps and 54 colonic teniae on supine and prone CTC images. The supine-to-prone change ranging between $-180^{\circ}$ and $+180^{\circ}$ (- and + for internal and external colonic rotations, respectively), was determined. In addition, possible causes of any ascending colonic rotations were explored. Results: Abdominal compression during prone CTC scanning completely disappeared with the use of cushion blocks in 17 of 18 patients. However, some degrees of ascending colonic rotation were still observed, with the radial location changes of $-22^{\circ}$ to $61^{\circ}$ (median, $13.9^{\circ}$) for the polyps and similar degrees for teniae. Fifty-four percent and 56% of polyps and teniae, respectively, showed changes > $10^{\circ}$. The radial location change of the polyps was significantly associated with the degree of anterior shift of the small bowel and mesentery (r = 0.722, p < 0.001) and the degree of posterior displacement of the ascending colon (r = 0.566, p = 0.004) during supine-to-prone positional change. Conclusion: Ascending colonic rotation upon supine-to-prone positional change during CTC, mostly in the form of external rotation, is not eliminated by removing abdominal compression in prone position.

Keywords

References

  1. Dachman AH. Scheduling, performing and reporting CT colonography. In: Dachman AH, Laghi A, eds. Atlas of virtual colonoscopy. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, Inc., 2011:87-109
  2. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ. MDCT protocol for CT colonography. In: Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, eds. CT colonography: principles and practice of virtual colonoscopy. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier, 2010:148-156
  3. Neri E, Halligan S, Hellstrom M, Lefere P, Mang T, Regge D, et al. The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2013;23:720-729 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2632-x
  4. Chen SC, Lu DS, Hecht JR, Kadell BM. CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:595-599 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.172.3.10063842
  5. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, MacCarty RL, Ahlquist DA, Reed JE, et al. Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 2000;216:704-711 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00au41704
  6. Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Keogan MT, Kruskal JB, Yam CS, Raptopoulos V. CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon. Eur Radiol 2002;12:525-530 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300100954
  7. Yee J, Kumar NN, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, Kumar PR, Wall SD. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. Radiology 2003;226:653-661 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2263010701
  8. Boone DJ, Halligan S, Roth HR, Hampshire TE, Helbren E, Slabaugh GG, et al. CT colonography: external clinical validation of an algorithm for computer-assisted prone and supine registration. Radiology 2013;268:752-760 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13122083
  9. Punwani S, Halligan S, Tolan D, Taylor SA, Hawkes D. Quantitative assessment of colonic movement between prone and supine patient positions during CT colonography. Br J Radiol 2009;82:475-481 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/91937173
  10. Chen JC, Dachman AH. Cecal mobility: a potential pitfall of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:1086-1089 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.04.1903
  11. Mang T, Maier A, Plank C, Mueller-Mang C, Herold C, Schima W. Pitfalls in multi-detector row CT colonography: a systematic approach. Radiographics 2007;27:431-454 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.272065081
  12. Kim JY, Park SH, Lee SS, Kim AY, Ha HK. Ascending colon rotation following patient positional change during CT colonography: a potential pitfall in interpretation. Eur Radiol 2011;21:353-359 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1928-y
  13. Saunders BP, Phillips RK, Williams CB. Intraoperative measurement of colonic anatomy and attachments with relevance to colonoscopy. Br J Surg 1995;82:1491-1493 https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800821113
  14. Saunders BP, Masaki T, Sawada T, Halligan S, Phillips RK, Muto T, et al. A peroperative comparison of Western and Oriental colonic anatomy and mesenteric attachments. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995;10:216-221 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346222
  15. Lee SS, Park SH, Kim JK, Kim N, Lee J, Park BJ, et al. Panoramic endoluminal display with minimal image distortion using circumferential radial ray-casting for primary three-dimensional interpretation of CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2009;19:1951-1959 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1362-1
  16. Buchach CM, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ. Performing an additional decubitus series at CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2011;36:538-544 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-010-9666-9
  17. Gryspeerdt SS, Herman MJ, Baekelandt MA, van Holsbeeck BG, Lefere PA. Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2004;14:768-777 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2264-x
  18. Pickhardt PJ, Bakke J, Kuo J, Robbins JB, Lubner MG, del Rio AM, et al. Volumetric analysis of colonic distention according to patient position at CT colonography: diagnostic value of the right lateral decubitus series. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:W623-W628 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.12369
  19. Lee JH, Park SH, Lee SS, Kim AY, Kim JC, Yu CS, et al. CT colonography in patients who have undergone sigmoid colostomy: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:W653-W657 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.6225
  20. Culligan K, Coffey JC, Kiran RP, Kalady M, Lavery IC, Remzi FH. The mesocolon: a prospective observational study. Colorectal Dis 2012;14:421-428; discussion 428-430 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02935.x

Cited by

  1. CT colonography interpretation: how to maximize polyp detection and minimize overcalling vol.43, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1455-x