References
- Dachman AH. Scheduling, performing and reporting CT colonography. In: Dachman AH, Laghi A, eds. Atlas of virtual colonoscopy. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, Inc., 2011:87-109
- Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ. MDCT protocol for CT colonography. In: Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, eds. CT colonography: principles and practice of virtual colonoscopy. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier, 2010:148-156
- Neri E, Halligan S, Hellstrom M, Lefere P, Mang T, Regge D, et al. The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2013;23:720-729 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2632-x
- Chen SC, Lu DS, Hecht JR, Kadell BM. CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:595-599 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.172.3.10063842
- Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, MacCarty RL, Ahlquist DA, Reed JE, et al. Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 2000;216:704-711 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00au41704
- Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Keogan MT, Kruskal JB, Yam CS, Raptopoulos V. CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon. Eur Radiol 2002;12:525-530 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300100954
- Yee J, Kumar NN, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, Kumar PR, Wall SD. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. Radiology 2003;226:653-661 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2263010701
- Boone DJ, Halligan S, Roth HR, Hampshire TE, Helbren E, Slabaugh GG, et al. CT colonography: external clinical validation of an algorithm for computer-assisted prone and supine registration. Radiology 2013;268:752-760 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13122083
- Punwani S, Halligan S, Tolan D, Taylor SA, Hawkes D. Quantitative assessment of colonic movement between prone and supine patient positions during CT colonography. Br J Radiol 2009;82:475-481 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/91937173
- Chen JC, Dachman AH. Cecal mobility: a potential pitfall of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:1086-1089 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.04.1903
- Mang T, Maier A, Plank C, Mueller-Mang C, Herold C, Schima W. Pitfalls in multi-detector row CT colonography: a systematic approach. Radiographics 2007;27:431-454 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.272065081
- Kim JY, Park SH, Lee SS, Kim AY, Ha HK. Ascending colon rotation following patient positional change during CT colonography: a potential pitfall in interpretation. Eur Radiol 2011;21:353-359 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1928-y
- Saunders BP, Phillips RK, Williams CB. Intraoperative measurement of colonic anatomy and attachments with relevance to colonoscopy. Br J Surg 1995;82:1491-1493 https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800821113
- Saunders BP, Masaki T, Sawada T, Halligan S, Phillips RK, Muto T, et al. A peroperative comparison of Western and Oriental colonic anatomy and mesenteric attachments. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995;10:216-221 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346222
- Lee SS, Park SH, Kim JK, Kim N, Lee J, Park BJ, et al. Panoramic endoluminal display with minimal image distortion using circumferential radial ray-casting for primary three-dimensional interpretation of CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2009;19:1951-1959 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1362-1
- Buchach CM, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ. Performing an additional decubitus series at CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2011;36:538-544 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-010-9666-9
- Gryspeerdt SS, Herman MJ, Baekelandt MA, van Holsbeeck BG, Lefere PA. Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2004;14:768-777 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2264-x
- Pickhardt PJ, Bakke J, Kuo J, Robbins JB, Lubner MG, del Rio AM, et al. Volumetric analysis of colonic distention according to patient position at CT colonography: diagnostic value of the right lateral decubitus series. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:W623-W628 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.12369
- Lee JH, Park SH, Lee SS, Kim AY, Kim JC, Yu CS, et al. CT colonography in patients who have undergone sigmoid colostomy: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:W653-W657 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.6225
- Culligan K, Coffey JC, Kiran RP, Kalady M, Lavery IC, Remzi FH. The mesocolon: a prospective observational study. Colorectal Dis 2012;14:421-428; discussion 428-430 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02935.x
Cited by
- CT colonography interpretation: how to maximize polyp detection and minimize overcalling vol.43, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1455-x