DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Higher Blood Pressure Variability in White Coat Hypertension; from the Korean Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry

  • Kang, In Sook (Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Pyun, Wook Bum (Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Shin, Jinho (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Ihm, Sang-Hyun (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Ju Han (Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Chonnam University) ;
  • Park, Sungha (Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Il (Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Woo-Shik (Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Soon Gil (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Shin, Gil Ja (Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
  • Received : 2015.01.13
  • Accepted : 2015.08.11
  • Published : 2016.05.30

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Blood pressure variability (BPV) was recently shown to be a risk factor of stroke. White coat hypertension (WCH) used to be regarded as innocuous, but one long-term follow-up study reported that WCH increased stroke rate compared to normotension (NT). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between WCH and BPV. Subjects and Methods: We analyzed 1398 subjects from the Korean Ambulatory Blood Pressure Registry, who were divided into NT (n=364), masked hypertension (n=122), white coat hypertension (n=254), and sustained hypertension (n=658) groups. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among groups. The average real variability (ARV), a highly sensitive BPV parameter, was highest in the WCH group, followed by the sustained hypertension, masked hypertension, and NT groups. The results persisted after being adjusted for covariates. The WCH vs. sustained hypertension results ($adjusted\;mean{\pm}standard\;error$) were as follows: 24-h systolic ARV, $22.9{\pm}0.8$ vs. $19.4{\pm}0.6$; 24-h diastolic ARV, $16.8{\pm}0.6$ vs. $14.3{\pm}0.5$; daytime systolic ARV, $21.8{\pm}0.8$ vs. $16.8{\pm}0.6$; and daytime diastolic ARV, $16.2{\pm}0.6$ vs. $13.4{\pm}0.5$ (p<0.001 for all comparisons). Conclusion: From the registry data, we found that subjects with WCH or masked hypertension had higher BPV than NT. However, long-term follow-up data assessing the clinical influences of WCH on stroke are needed.

Keywords

References

  1. Julius S, Mejia A, Jones K, et al. "White coat" versus "sustained" borderline hypertension in Tecumseh, Michigan. Hypertension 1990;16:617-23. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.16.6.617
  2. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Boldrini F, Zampi I, Porcellati C. Variability between current definitions of 'normal' ambulatory blood pressure. Implications in the assessment of white coat hypertension. Hypertension 1992;20:555-62. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.20.4.555
  3. Bonow RO, Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P. Braunwald's Heart Disease. 9th ed. Philadelphia; Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012. p.218.
  4. Fagard RH, Cornelissen VA. Incidence of cardiovascular events in white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension versus true normotension: a meta-analysis. J Hypertens 2007;25:2193-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282ef6185
  5. Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, Metoki H, et al. Prognosis of "masked" hypertension and "white-coat" hypertension detected by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 10-year follow-up from the Ohasama study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:508-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.070
  6. Mancia G, Bombelli M, Brambilla G, et al. Long-term prognostic value of white coat hypertension: an insight from diagnostic use of both ambulatory and home blood pressure measurements. Hypertension 2013;62:168-74. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.00690
  7. Glen SK, Elliott HL, Curzio JL, Lees KR, Reid JL. White-coat hypertension as a cause of cardiovascular dysfunction. Lancet 1996;348:654-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02303-3
  8. Mancia G, Facchetti R, Bombelli M, Grassi G, Sega R. Long-term risk of mortality associated with selective and combined elevation in office, home, and ambulatory blood pressure. Hypertension 2006;47:846-53. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000215363.69793.bb
  9. Rothwell PM. Limitations of the usual blood-pressure hypothesis and importance of variability, instability, and episodic hypertension. Lancet 2010;375:938-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60309-1
  10. Pierdomenico SD, Di Nicola M, Esposito AL, et al. Prognostic value of different indices of blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 2009;22:842-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajh.2009.103
  11. Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, et al. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet 2010;375:895-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60308-X
  12. Poortvliet RK, Ford I, Lloyd SM, et al. Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular risk in the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER). PLoS One 2012;7:e52438. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052438
  13. Endo K, Kario K, Koga M, et al. Impact of early blood pressure variability on stroke outcomes after thrombolysis: the SAMURAI rt-PA Registry. Stroke 2013;44:816-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.681007
  14. Schillaci G, Bilo G, Pucci G, et al. Relationship between short-term blood pressure variability and large-artery stiffness in human hypertension: findings from 2 large databases. Hypertension 2012;60:369-77. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.197491
  15. Zakopoulos NA, Tsivgoulis G, Barlas G, et al. Impact of the time rate of blood pressure variation on left ventricular mass. J Hypertens 2006;24:2071-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000244957.47114.88
  16. Franks PW. White-coat hypertension and risk of stroke: do the data really tell us what we need to know? Hypertension 2005;45:183-4. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000151621.03913.f3
  17. Kang IS, Pyun WB, Shin J, Kim JH, Kim SG, Shin GJ. Association between central obesity and circadian parameters of blood pressure from the korean ambulatory blood pressure monitoring registry: Kor-ABP registry. J Korean Med Sci 2013;28:1461-7. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2013.28.10.1461
  18. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003;42:1206-52. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2
  19. Mena L, Pintos S, Queipo NV, Aizpurua JA, Maestre G, Sulbaran T. A reliable index for the prognostic significance of blood pressure variability. J Hypertens 2005;23:505-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000160205.81652.5a
  20. Cacciolati C, Tzourio C, Hanon O. Blood pressure variability in elderly persons with white-coat and masked hypertension compared to those with normotension and sustained hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2013;26:367-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hps054
  21. Myers MG. Pseudoresistant hypertension attributed to white-coat effect. Hypertension 2012;59:532-3. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.189472
  22. Bjorklund K, Lind L, Vessby B, Andren B, Lithell H. Different metabolic predictors of white-coat and sustained hypertension over a 20-year follow-up period: a population-based study of elderly men. Circulation 2002;106:63-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000019737.87850.5A
  23. Sorof JM, Poffenbarger T, Franco K, Portman R. Evaluation of white coat hypertension in children: importance of the definitions of normal ambulatory blood pressure and the severity of casual hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2001;14(9 Pt 1):855-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7061(01)02180-X
  24. Parati G, Di Rienzo M, Mancia G. Neural cardiovascular regulation and 24-hour blood pressure and heart rate variability. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1996;783:47-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb26706.x
  25. Pickering TG. Variability of blood pressure. Blood Press Monit 1998;3:141-5.
  26. Diaz KM, Veerabhadrappa P, Kashem MA, et al. Relationship of visit-to-visit and ambulatory blood pressure variability to vascular function in African Americans. Hypertens Res 2012;35:55-61. https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2011.135
  27. Verdecchia P, Reboldi GP, Angeli F, et al. Short- and long-term incidence of stroke in white-coat hypertension. Hypertension 2005;45:203-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000151623.49780.89
  28. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2013;34:2159-219. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht151
  29. Hong KS, Bang OY, Kang DW, et al. Stroke statistics in Korea: part I. Epidemiology and risk factors: a report from the korean stroke society and clinical research center for stroke. J Stroke 2013;15:2-20. https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2013.15.1.2
  30. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics-2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015;131:434-41. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000157

Cited by

  1. Short-term variability and nocturnal decline in ambulatory blood pressure in normotension, white-coat hypertension, masked hypertension and sustained hypertension: a population-based study of older in vol.40, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2017.9
  2. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability in children and adolescents with renal disease vol.22, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-018-1557-3
  3. Hypertension and arterial stiffness vol.21, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.13690
  4. Clinical features and predictors of masked uncontrolled hypertension from the Korean Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry vol.36, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2020.650