DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Intervention Study on the Implementation of Control Banding in Controlling Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises

  • 투고 : 2015.06.21
  • 심사 : 2015.12.02
  • 발행 : 2016.09.30

초록

Background: Management and workers in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) often find it hard to comprehend the requirements related to controlling risks due to exposure to substances. An intervention study was set up in order to support 45 SMEs in improving the management of the risks of occupational exposure to chemicals, and in using the control banding tool and exposure model Stoffenmanager in this process. Methods: A 2-year intervention study was carried out, in which a mix of individual and collective training and support was offered, and baseline and effect measurements were carried out by means of structured interviews, in order to measure progress made. A seven-phase implementation evolutionary ladder was used for this purpose. Success and failure factors were identified by means of company visits and structured interviews. Results: Most companies clearly moved upwards on the implementation evolutionary ladder; 76% of the companies by at least one phase, and 62% by at least two phases. Success and failure factors were described. Conclusion: Active training and coaching helped the participating companies to improve their chemical risk management, and to avoid making mistakes when using and applying Stoffenmanager. The use of validated tools embedded in a community platform appears to support companies to organize and structure their chemical risk management in a business-wise manner, but much depends upon motivated occupational health and safety (OHS) professionals, management support, and willingness to invest time and means.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brun E. Expert forecast on emerging chemical risks related to occupational safety and health. Bilbao (Spain): European Agency for Safety and Health at Work; 2009. 197 p.
  2. Pruss-Ustun A, Vickers C, Heafliger P, Bertolline R. Knowns and unknowns on burden of disease due to chemicals: a systematic review. Environ Health 2011;10:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-10-1
  3. Walters D. The efficacy of strategies for chemical risk management in small enterprises in Europe: evidence for success? PPHS (Policy and Practice in Health and Safety) 2006;1:81-116.
  4. Zalk DM, Nelson DI. History and evolution of control banding: a review. J Occup Environ Hyg 2008;5:330-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620801997916
  5. Zalk DM, Paik SY, Swuste P. Evaluating the control banding nanotool: a qualitative risk assessment method for controlling nanoparticle exposures. J Nanopart Res 2009:1685-704.
  6. Zalk D, Heussen H. Banding the world together; the global growth of control banding and qualitative occupational risk management. Saf Health Work 2011:375-9.
  7. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Qualitative risk characterization and management of occupational hazards: control banding (CB) e a literature review and critical analysis. Washington DC (WA): NIOSH; 2009. Publication 2009-152. 118 p.
  8. Marquart H, Heussen H, Le Feber M, Noy D, Tielemans E, Schinkel J, West J, Van der Schaaf D. 'Stoffenmanager', a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model. Ann Occup Hyg 2008;6:429-41.
  9. Tielemans E, Warren N, Fransman W, Van Tongeren M, McNally K, Tischer M, Ritchie P, Kromhout H, Schinkel J, Schneider T, Cherrie JW. Advanced REACH Tool (ART): overview of Version 1.0 and research needs. Ann Occup Hyg 2011;9:949-56.
  10. Dekker H. Stoffenmanager, is it used (properly)?, Presentation at the 20th symposium of the Dutch Occupational Hygiene Association, Zeist, April 13, 2011. [in Dutch].
  11. Cope M. Human factors/usability evaluation of the internet based electronic COSHH-essentials system. Derbyshire (UK): Health & Safety Laboratory, Buxton; 2007. Report No.: HSL/2007/60. 164 p.
  12. Schinkel J, Fransman W, McDonnell PE, Klein Entink R, Tielemans E, Kromhout H. Reliability of the Advanced REACH Tool (ART). Ann Occup Hyg 2014;4:450-68.
  13. Lamb J, Crawford JO, Davis A, Cowie H, Galea K, Van Tongeren M. E-team project deliverable D22, report on between-user reliability exercise (BURE) and workshop. Edinburg (UK): Institute of Occupational Medicine; 2014. 220 p.
  14. Saleh FMA. Arbo in bedrijf 2010. The Hague (Netherlands): Labor Inspectorate; 2011. 220 p. [in Dutch].

피인용 문헌

  1. How to Obtain a Reliable Estimate of Occupational Exposure? Review and Discussion of Models’ Reliability vol.16, pp.15, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152764
  2. Exposure Models for REACH and Occupational Safety and Health Regulations vol.17, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020383
  3. Response to Savic et al. on: Inter-assessor Agreement for TREXMO and Its Models Outside the Translation Framework vol.64, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxz094