Journal of Arbitration Studies (한국중재학회지:중재연구)

The Korean Association of Arbitration Studies (한국중재학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Park Tae-hwan v. The Korean Olympic Committee: The Breakdown of Sports Jurisprudence in Korea

  • Phillips, Joe (Department of Global Studies, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lim, Suk-Jun (Graduate School of International Studies, at Dong-A University)
  • Received : 2016.08.05
  • Accepted : 2016.08.28
  • Published : 2016.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Park Tae-hwan, the Korean Olympic gold medal swimmer, was suspended for eighteen months by the International Swimming Federation (FINA) in September 2014. Park completed his suspension in March 2016, but the Korea Olympic Committee (KOC), relying on its Article 5.6, then prohibited him from joining the national team for an additional three years for the same doping violation. The KOC's penalty exceeded that provided by the World Anti-Doping Code, which governs the Olympics and most international sports federations, and contravened well-established precedent from the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). The KOC, along with the Korea Swimming Federation, maintained the suspension until decisions by the Seoul Eastern District Court and CAS forced them to retract the penalty. We describe the sports regulations and arbitration decisions governing the Park case, how each side used the law to support their positions, the flaws in the KOC's legal analysis, and the case's resolutions by the Korean court and CAS. Finally, because this legal conflict has damaged the KOC's reputation, created uncertainty over the committee's doping penalties, and undercut the authority of the World Anti-Doping Code and the CAS in Korea, we recommend institutional changes in Korea's sports jurisprudence.

Keywords

References

  1. Amos, Anne and Fridman, Saul, Toward a Social Science of Drugs in Sport, ed. Jason Mazanov, New York: Routledge, 2011,
  2. Associated Press, "Park Tae-hwan Blocked from Competing at Olympics in Rio," 7 April 2016.
  3. Blackshaw, Ian, "ADR and Sport: Settling Disputes through the Court of Arbitration for Sport, the FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber, and the WIPO Arbitration & Mediation Center," 24 Marquette Sports Law Review, 1, Fall 2013.
  4. Bundesgericht [BGer] [Federal Tribunal] Apr. 18, 2011, 4A_640/2010 (Switz.) (athlete claimed violation of right to be heard; appealed denied);
  5. Bundesgericht [BGer] [Federal Tribunal] Oct. 3, 2011, 4A_530/2011 (Switz.) (athlete claimed that CAS did not have jurisdiction; appeal dismissed).
  6. CAS (Court of Arbitration for Sports), Code of Sports-related Arbitration, 2016.
  7. CAS, Media Release, "Swimming: Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) Rules that Tae hwan Park is Eligible for Selection for the Korean Team for the Rio 2016 Olympic Games," 8 July 2016.
  8. CAS 2004/A/704 Yang Tae Young v/FIG.
  9. CAS 2011/A/2403 WADA v. Jobson Leandro Pereira de Oliveira, Confederacao Brasileira de Futebol (CBF) & Superior Tribunal de Justica Desportiva de Futebol (STJD), 25, Aug. 2011.
  10. CAS 2011/A/2658 British Olympic Association (BOA) v. World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), 30 Apr. 2012.
  11. CAS 2011/A/2612 Liao Hui v. International Weightlifting Federation (IWF), 23 July 2012.
  12. CAS 2011/O/2422 US Olympic Committee (USOC) v. International Olympic Committee (IOC), 4 Oct. 2011.
  13. CAS 2011/O/2422 WADA v. International Gymnastics Federations & Melnychenko, 6, Oct. 2011.
  14. Daily Herald, "Park Tae-hwan Blocked from Competing at Olympics in Rio," 7 April 2016.
  15. Chosun Ilbo (English Edition), "Swimmer Park Tae-hwan Pleads for Olympics Chance," 3 May 2016. http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2016/05/03/2016050301320.html (search 11 July 2016).
  16. CNN, "Russian doping: 'An Unprecedented Attack on the Integrity of Sport & the Olympic Games,'" 21 July 2016.
  17. IOC (International Olympic Committee), Olympic Charter, IOC: Lausanne, Switzerland, 2015. Available at https://stillmed.olympic.org/Documents/olympic_charter_en.pdf. (searched on Aug. 2015).
  18. Kim, Dae-Hee, "A Study on the Establishment of an Arbitration System for the Resolution of Domestic Sports Disputes," Journal of Arbitration Studies, Vol.24, No.1, 2014, pp.159-179. https://doi.org/10.16998/jas.2014.24.1.159
  19. Kim, Sung-Ryong and Ahn, Keon-Hyung, "A Study on the Problem and Improvement of Arbitration System for Resolution of Domestic Sports Dispute," The Journal of Sports and Law, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2012, pp.71-99.
  20. KOC (Korean Olympic Committee), Article of Association.
  21. KOC News Release, Revising the Selection Rule for a Specific Person Not Desirable, dated 2016.4.07.
  22. KOC News Release, Decision to Maintain the Existing Regulation Regarding National Athlete Selection, dated 2016.6.16.
  23. KOC News Release, Will Respect CAS Decision on National Athlete Selection, dated 2016.7.08(a).
  24. KOC News Release, KOC Accepts CAS Decision, dated 2016.7.08(b).
  25. Korea Joongang Daily, "Olympics Looking Even More Unlikely for Park," 17 June 2016. http://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=3020103 (search date: 2016-07-10).
  26. Korea Times, "Floor Leader Pleads for Second Chance for Park Tai-hwan," dated 2016. 5.04. access date: 2016.7.01. http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2016/07/116_204041.html?dable=10.1.4.
  27. Lee, Chong-hoon, "KOC's Doggedness: We Can't Lost to Park Tae-hwan," pressian.com, 9 July 2016. access date: 2016.7.30. http://www.pressian.com/news/article.html?no=138282.
  28. Lee, Han-Shin and Kim, Sung-Yong, "Cross-border Internet Dispute Resolution," Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol.2 No.1, 2010.
  29. New York Arbitration Convention, UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards,
  30. Park, Eun-Young and Cho, Eun-A, 2015. "Sports Dispute Resolution: On the Mediating Procedure of CAS," Korean Forum on International Trade and Business Law, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2015, pp. 73-98.
  31. Report of the Work Group to the Secretary of State (Amateur Sport), "A Win-Win Solution: Creating a National Alternate Dispute Resolution System for Amateur Sport in Canada," May 2000. Available at http://www.crdsc-sdrcc.ca/eng/documents/Working-Group-Report-e.pdf.
  32. Seoul District Court, Singapore Company A v Korean Pilot B ("Pilot Training Case"), 2012 Gadan 348225, 2013.9.26.
  33. Seoul Central District Court, 46th Civil Division, Hyundai Motors v C.J. Jeon, 2012 Gahap 5730, 2012.4.27.
  34. Seoul Eastern District Court, 21st Civil Division, Case No. 2016 Injunction to Confirm that Reason for Disqualification as National Athlete Does Not Exist, 2016 Kahap 228, 2016.7.01.
  35. Swim Swam, n.d. "Park Tae Hwan Officially Ruled Out of 2016 Olympic Games," https://swimswam.com/park-tae-hwan-officially-ruled-out-of-2016-olympic-games/.
  36. USA Today, "Split Widens between IOC, Anti-Doping Leaders over Russia," 1 Aug. 2106.
  37. Yeun, Kee-Young, "The Development of International Sports Arbitration Bodies and Challenges of Legislative Policy for Reestablishment of Sports Arbitration Agency in Korea," Journal of Arbitration Studies, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2013, pp.101-126. https://doi.org/10.16998/jas.2013.23.3.101
  38. WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency), World Anti-Doping Code, Montreal, Canada, 200 9. Text available at http://www.intjudo.eu/editor_up/up/WADA_Anti-Doping_CODE_2009_EN.pdf.
  39. Zagger, Zachary, "German High Court Denies Skater's Challenge to Sports Court," Law360, 7 June 2016.