한국의학물리학회지:의학물리 (Progress in Medical Physics)

  • 제27권2호
  • /
  • Pages.55-63
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2508-4445(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-4453(eISSN)
한국의학물리학회 (Korean Society of Medical Physics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

다양한 두께의 알루미늄 판을 이용한 MTF 측정에 관한 연구

Modulation Transfer Function with Aluminum Sheets of Varying Thickness

  • 이동주 (동남권원자력의학원 연구센터) ;
  • 김미영 (동남권원자력의학원 연구센터) ;
  • 문영민 (동남권원자력의학원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 정동혁 (동남권원자력의학원 연구센터)
  • Rhee, Dong Joo (Research Center, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences) ;
  • Kim, Me Young (Research Center, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences) ;
  • Moon, Young Min (Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences) ;
  • Jeong, Dong Hyeok (Research Center, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences)
  • 투고 : 2016.06.02
  • 심사 : 2016.06.10
  • 발행 : 2016.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 방사선치료기용 CBCT의 영상과 같이 해상도가 낮은 경우에 적용할 수 있는 MTF (modulation transfer function) 평가 방법을 고안하였다. 본 연구에서는 두꺼운 알루미늄 판의 영상을 이용하여 중복 표본(oversampling) 방법과 두께 보정 방법을 적용하여 MTF를 결정하였다. 다양한 알루미늄 판의 두께(0.3~1.2 mm)에 대해 MTF를 분석하였으며 경사 영상과 평행 영상의 경우에 대해서도 비교하였다. 연구 결과 치료계획용 CT인 경우에 알루미늄의 두께가 0.8 mm 이하 일 경우 MTF 측정이 가능한 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 두꺼운 알루미늄 판과 두께 보정을 이용한 MTF 측정이 CT 영상에서 가능하였다.

We studied the method to gain a clear LSF using a thick aluminum sheet and to acquire the spatial resolution value with a high accuracy for a low spatial resolution imaging modality. In this study, aluminum sheets with thicknesses varying from 0.3 mm to 1.2 mm were tested to derive a modulation transfer function (MTF) for the oversampling and non-oversampling methods. The results were evaluated to verify the feasibility of the use of thick sheets for periodic quality assurance. Oversampling was more accurate than non-oversampling, and an aluminum sheet with a correction factor less than 2 at the cut-off frequency, which was less than 0.8 mm in this case, was confirmed to be suitable for MTF measurements. Therefore, MTF derivation from a thick aluminum sheet with thickness correction is plausible for a medical imaging modality.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Boone JM: Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography. Medical Physics. 28(3):356 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1350438
  2. Garayoa J, Castro P: A study on image quality provided by a kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography. J Appl Clin Med Phys.14(1):3888 (2013)
  3. Villafana T: Modulation transfer function of a finite scanning microdensitometer slit. Medical Physics. 2(5):251 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.594187
  4. Gopal A, Samant SS: Use of a line-pair resolution phantom for comprehensive quality assurance of electronic portal imaging devices based on fundamental imaging metrics. Medical Physics. 36(6):2006 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3099559
  5. Nickoloff EL: A simplified approach for modulation transfer function determinations in computed tomography. Medical Physics. 12(4):437 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.595706
  6. Fujita H, Tsai DY, Itoh T, Morishita, J, Ueda K, Ohtsuka A: A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging.11(1):34-39 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1109/42.126908
  7. Nakaya Y, Kawata Y, Niki N, Umetatni K, Ohmatsu H, Moriyama N: A method for determining the modulation transfer function from thick microwire profiles measured with x-ray microcomputed tomography. Medical Physics. 39(7):4347-4364 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4729711
  8. Schwarzband G, Kiryati N: The point spread function of spiral CT. Phys Med Biol. 50(22):5307-5322 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/22/007
  9. Watanabe H, Honda E, Kurabayashi, T: Modulation transfer function evaluation of cone beam computed tomography for dental use with the oversampling method. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 39(1):28-32 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/27069629
  10. Yoo BG, Kweon DC, Lee JS: MTF Evaluation and Clinical Application according to the Characteristic Kernels in the Computed Tomography. Korean J Med Phy. 18(2):55-64 (2007)
  11. Mieville F, Beaumont S, Torfeh T, Gudinchet F, Verdun F. R.: Computed tomography commissioning programmes:how to obtain a reliable MTF with an automatic approach?. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 139(1-3):443-448 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq050
  12. Villafana T: Effect of finite exposure slits in determination of the line spread function and modulation transfer function. Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol. 16(3):281-288 (1977) https://doi.org/10.3109/02841867709133948
  13. Ohkubo M, Wada S, Matsumoto T, Nishizawa K: An effective method to verify line and point spread functions measured in computed tomography. Medical Physics. 33(8):2757 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2214168
  14. Marchand E. W.: Derivation of the Point Spread Function from the Line Spread Function. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 54(7):915-919(1964) https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.54.000915
  15. Kayugawa A, Ohkubo M, Wada S: Accurate determination of CT point-spread-function with high precision. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 14(4) (2013)
  16. Hyer DE, Serago CF, Kim S, Li JG, Hintenlang DE: An organ and effective dose study of XVI and OBI cone-beam CT systems. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 11(2) (2010)
  17. Yagi M, Ueguchi T, Koizumi M, et al: Gemstone spectral imaging:determination of CT to ED conversion curves for radiotherapy treatment planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys 14(5):173-186 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4335