Asia Marketing Journal

Korean Marketing Association (한국마케팅학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Interaction between Corporate Reputation and Negativity Framing on Consumer Evaluation of Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Received : 2016.01.05
  • Accepted : 2016.02.15
  • Published : 2016.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Do corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives lead to positive outcomes for companies? Although it is commonly accepted that CSR is a necessary component of modern marketing communication, the empirical evidence shows that that is not always the case. If CSR is sometimes not conducive to better marketing, it behooves firms to determine the right conditions that foster more effective CSR. It is in that vein that this study aims to add to the growing body of marketing and CSR literature through a series of experiments that examines the dynamics between prior attitude toward the company, the fit between the company and the CSR cause, and consumers' accessible thoughts. This study finds that the prior corporate reputation has an impact on how consumers evaluate the CSR activities of companies. Moreover, we show that the degree of accessible thoughts and their valence can change the moderating effect of the fit between the company and the CSR cause. This is because negative information is perceived as being more diagnostic than positive information in an evaluation situation. We demonstrate that companies that have lower prior public reputations can improve the evaluation of their CSR activities in two major ways: (1) by finding CSR causes that have a lower fit with their business, or (2) by providing information that allow consumers to access more positive thoughts about the CSR activity.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahluwalia, Rohini (2002), "How Prevalent Is the Negativity Effect in Consumer Environments?," Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (September), 270-79.
  2. Bhattacharya, C. B. and S. Sen (2004), "Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives," California Management Review, 47, 9-24.
  3. Becker-Olsen, K. L., B. A. Cudmore and R. P. Hill (2006), "The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior," Journal of Business Research, 59, 46-53.
  4. Bower, Amanda B. and Landreth Grau (2009), "Explicit Donations and Inferred Endorsements; Do Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives Suggest a Nonprofit Organization Endorsement?," Journal of Advertising, 38 (3), 113-126
  5. Brown, Tom J. and Peter A. Dacin (1997), "The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses," Journal of Marketing, 61 (1), 68-85.
  6. Creyer, Elizabeth and William T. Ross (1997), "The Influence of Firm Behavior on Purchase Intention: Do Consumers Really Care about Business Ethics?" Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14 (6), 421-428.
  7. Drumwright, Minnette E. (1996), "Company Advertising with a Social Dimension: The Role of Non-economic Criteria," Journal of Marketing, 60, 71-87.
  8. Ellen, Pam Scholder, Lois A. Mohr, and Deborah J. Web (2000), "Charitable Programs and the Retailer: Do they Mix?" Journal of Retailing, 76 (3) 393-406.
  9. Folkes, V. S. and M. A. Kamins (1999), "Effects of Information About Firms' Ethical and Unethical Actions on Consumers Attitudes," Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 243-259.
  10. Forehand, Mark R. and Sonya Grier (2003), "When is Honesty the Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism," Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13 (3), 349-356.
  11. Herr, Paul M., Frank R. Kardes, and John Kim (1991), "Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (March), 454-462.
  12. Kim, Seongjin and Jongkeun Kim (2010), "The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Image: The Role of Spillover Effect and Negativity Effect based on CSR dimensions," Asia Marketing Journal, 11 (4), 49-67.
  13. Livesey, S. (1993), 'McDonald's and the Environment (A)', Harvard Business Case School, 9-391-108
  14. Luo, Xueming., and C. B. Bhattacharya (2006), "Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value," Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1-18.
  15. Maheswaran, Durairaj, and Joan Meyers-Levy (1990), "The influence of message framing and issue involvement," Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361-367
  16. Menon, Satya and Barbara Kahn (2003), "Corporate Sponsorships of Philanthropic Activities: When Do They Impact Perception of Sponsor Brand?" Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13 (3) 316-327.
  17. Murray, Keith and Christine M Vogel (1997), "Using a Hierarchy-of-effects Approach to Gauge the Effectiveness of Corporate Social Responsibility to Generate Goodwill Toward the Firm: Financial versus Nonfinancial Impacts," Journal of Business Research, 38 (2), 141-160.
  18. Osterhus, L. T. (1997) 'Pro-social consumer influence strategies: when and how do they work?', Journal of Marketing, 61 (October), 16-29.
  19. Park Jongchul, Kyungjin Kim, and Hanjoon Lee (2010), "Developing a Scale for Measuring the Corporate Social Responsibility Activities of Korea Corporation: Focusing on the Consumers' Awareness, Asia Marketing Journal, 12 (2), 27-52.
  20. Rozin, P., and E. B. Royzman (2001), "Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion," Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296-320
  21. Sen, Sankar and C. B. Bhattacharya (2001), "Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (2) 225-243.
  22. Strahilevitz, M. (2003), "The effects of prior impressions of a firm's ethics on the success of a cause-related marketing campaign: do the good look better while the bad look worse?," Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 77-92.
  23. van de Ven, Bert (2008), "An Ethical Framework for the Marketing of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 339-352
  24. Zyglidopoulos, S. C. (2002), "The social and environmental responsibilities of multinationals: Evidence from the Bret Spar case," Journal of Business Ethics, 36 (1-2), 141-151