DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Non-Gaussian time-dependent statistics of wind pressure processes on a roof structure

  • Huang, M.F. (Institute of Structural Engineering, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Huang, Song (Institute of Structural Engineering, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Feng, He (Institute of Structural Engineering, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Lou, Wenjuan (Institute of Structural Engineering, Zhejiang University)
  • Received : 2016.01.21
  • Accepted : 2016.06.10
  • Published : 2016.10.25

Abstract

Synchronous multi-pressure measurements were carried out with relatively long time duration for a double-layer reticulated shell roof model in the atmospheric boundary layer wind tunnel. Since the long roof is open at two ends for the storage of coal piles, three different testing cases were considered as the empty roof without coal piles (Case A), half coal piles inside (Case B) and full coal piles inside (Case C). Based on the wind tunnel test results, non-Gaussian time-dependent statistics of net wind pressure on the shell roof were quantified in terms of skewness and kurtosis. It was found that the direct statistical estimation of high-order moments and peak factors is quite sensitive to the duration of wind pressure time-history data. The maximum value of COVs (Coefficients of variations) of high-order moments is up to 1.05 for several measured pressure processes. The Mixture distribution models are proposed for better modeling the distribution of a parent pressure process. With the aid of mixture parent distribution models, the existing translated-peak-process (TPP) method has been revised and improved in the estimation of non-Gaussian peak factors. Finally, non-Gaussian peak factors of wind pressure, particularly for those observed hardening pressure process, were calculated by employing various state-of-the-art methods and compared to the direct statistical analysis of the measured long-duration wind pressure data. The estimated non-Gaussian peak factors for a hardening pressure process at the leading edge of the roof were varying from 3.6229, 3.3693 to 3.3416 corresponding to three different cases of A, B and C.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Natural Science Foundation of China

References

  1. Abhilash, S. and Jeffrey, M.F. (2014), "Non-Gaussian analysis methods for planing craft motion", Ocean Syst. Eng., 4(4), 293-308. https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2014.4.4.293
  2. Akdag, S.A., Bagiorgas, H.S. and Mihalakakou, G. (2010), "Use of two-component Weibull mixtures in the analysis of wind speed in the Eastern Mediterranean", Appl. Energ., 87(8), 2566-2573 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.02.033
  3. Bordes, L., Mottelet, S. and Vandekerkhove, P. (2006). "Semiparametric estimation of a two-component mixture model", Ann. Stat., 34(3), 1204-1232. https://doi.org/10.1214/009053606000000353
  4. Butt, U., Jehring, L. and Egbers, C. (2014), "Mechanism of drag reduction for circular cylinders with patterned surface", Int. J. Heat. Fluid. Fl., 45, 128-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2013.10.008
  5. Chen, X. (2014), "Extreme value distribution and peak factor of crosswind response of flexible structures with nonlinear aeroelastic effect", J. Struct. Eng., DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001017, 04014091.
  6. Choi, M. and Sweetman, B. (2010), "The Hermite moment model for highly skewed response with application to tension leg platforms", J. Offshore. Mech. Arct., 132, 021602. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4000398
  7. DeCarlo, L.T. (1997), "On the meaning and use of kurtosis", Psychol. Methods., 2(3), 292-307. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.3.292
  8. Ding, J. and Chen, X. (2014), "Assessment of methods for extreme value analysis of non-Gaussian wind effects with short-term time history samples", Eng. Struct., 80, 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.041
  9. Filliben, J.J. (1975), "The probability plot correlation coefficient test for normality", Technometrics, 17(1), 111-117 https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1975.10489279
  10. Harris, I. (2005), "Generalised Pareto methods for wind extremes: usefull tool or mathematical mirage?", J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerod., 93, 341-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2005.02.004
  11. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. and Friedman, J.H. (2009), The elements of statistical learning, (2nd Ed.), Springer, New York.
  12. Huang, M.F., Lou, W.J., Chan, C.M. et al. (2013), "Peak distributions and peak factors of wind-induced pressure processes on tall buildings", J. Eng. Mech.- ASCE, 139(12), 1744-1756. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000616
  13. Huang, M.F., Lou, W.J., Pan, X.T. et al. (2014), "Hermite extreme value estimation of non-Gaussian wind load process on a long-span roof structure", J. Struct. Eng.- ASCE.
  14. Jiang, Y., Tao, J. and Wang, D. (2014), "Simulation of non-Gaussian stochastic processes by amplitude modulation and phase reconstruction", Wind Struct.,18(6), 693-715. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2014.18.6.693
  15. Kareem, A. and Zhao, J. (1994), "Analysis of non-gaussian surge response of tension leg platforms under wind loads", J. Offshore. Mech. Arct. Eng., 116, 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2920142
  16. Kwon, D. and Kareem, A. (2011), "Peak factors for non-Gaussian load effects revisited", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 137(12), 1611-1619. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000412
  17. MacDonald, A., Scarrott, C.J. and Lee, D.S. (2011b), Boundary correction, consistency and robustness of kernel densities using extreme value theory. Available from: http://www.math.canterbury.ac.nz/ c.scarrott.
  18. MacDonald, A., Scarrott, C.J., Lee, D., Darlow, B., Reale, M. and Russell, G. (2011a), "A flexible extreme value mixture model", Comp. Statist. Data. Anal., 55, 2137-2157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2011.01.005
  19. National Stanadrd of China (2012), Load code for the design of building structures. GB 50009-2012. (in chinese).
  20. Peng, X., Yang, L., Gavanski, E. et al. (2014), "A comparison of methods to estimate peak wind loads on buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 126, 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.12.013
  21. Sadek, F. and Simiu, E. (2002), "Peak non-Gaussian wind effects for database-assisted low-rise building design", J. Eng. Mech.- ASCE, 128, 530-539. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:5(530)
  22. Tieleman, H.W., Elsayed, M.A.K. and Hajj, M.R. (2006), "Peak wind load comparison: theoretical estimates and ASCE 7", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 132(7), 1150-1157. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:7(1150)
  23. Titterington, D.M., Smith, A.F.M. and Makov, U.E. (1995), Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions, (2nd Ed.), New York, Wiley.
  24. Winterstein, S.R. (1988), "Nonlinear vibration models for extremes and fatigue", J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE, 114, 1772-1790. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1988)114:10(1772)
  25. Winterstein, S.R. and Kashef, T. (2000), "Moment-based load and response models with wind engineering applications", J. Sol. Energy Eng. T- ASME, 122(3), 122-128. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1288028
  26. Winterstein, S.R. and MacKenzie, C.A. (2012), "Extremes of nonlinear vibration: models based on moments, L-moments, and maximum entropy", J.Offshore.Mech. Arct., 135(2), 021602.
  27. Yang, L., Gurley, K.R. and Prevatt, D.O. (2013). "Probabilistic modeling of wind pressure on low-rise buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 114, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.12.014
  28. Zheng, H., Huang, G. and Liu, X. (2014), "Mixture probability distributions of wind pressure on low-rise buildings", Proceedings of the 2014 World Congress on Advances in Civil, Environmental and Materials Research (ACEM14), Busan, Korea, August 24-28.

Cited by

  1. Non-stationary and non-Gaussian characteristics of wind speeds vol.24, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2017.24.1.059
  2. On the Use of the Cubic Translation to Model Bimodal Wind Pressures vol.15, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2478/mmce-2019-0006
  3. Investigation of the Time Dependence of Wind-Induced Aeroelastic Response on a Scale Model of a High-Rise Building vol.11, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083315
  4. Extreme estimation of wind pressure with unimodal and bimodal probability density function characteristics: A maximum entropy model based on fractional moments vol.214, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104663