한국전문물리치료학회지 (Physical Therapy Korea)

  • 제23권3호
  • /
  • Pages.40-47
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1225-8962(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-982X(eISSN)
한국전문물리치료학회 (Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Wii Balance Board를 이용한 Sit-to-Stand와 보행기능 측정의 검사-재검사 신뢰도

Test-retest Reliability of Sit-to-Stand and Gait Assessment Using the Wii Balance Board

  • 양승례 (건양대학교 의과학대학 물리치료학과) ;
  • 오유리 (건양대학교 의과학대학 물리치료학과) ;
  • 전예림 (건양대학교 의과학대학 물리치료학과) ;
  • 박대성 (건양대학교 의과학대학 물리치료학과)
  • Yang, Seong-rye (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Konyang University) ;
  • Oh, Yu-ri (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Konyang University) ;
  • Jeon, Ye-rim (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Konyang University) ;
  • Park, Dae-sung (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Konyang University)
  • 투고 : 2016.03.17
  • 심사 : 2016.05.24
  • 발행 : 2016.09.17
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: Assessments of Sit-to-Stand (STS) and gait functions are essential procedures in evaluating level of independence for the patients after stroke. In a previous study, we developed the software to analyze center of pressure (COP) in standing position on Wii Balance Board (WBB). Objects: This purpose of this study is to measure test-retest reliability of ground reaction forces, COP and time using WBB on STS and gait in healthy adults. Methods: Fifteen healthy participants performed three trials of STS and gait on WBB. The time (s), vertical peak (%) and COP path-length (cm) were measured on both tasks. Additionally, counter (%), different peak (%), symmetry ratio, COP x-range and COP y-range were analyzed on STS, 1st peak (%), 2nd peak (%) of weight were analyzed on gait. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error measurement (SEM) and smallest real difference (SRD) were analyzed for test-retest reliability. Results: ICC of all variables except COP path-length appeared to .676~.946 on STS, and to .723~.901 on gait. SEM and SRD of all variables excepting COP path-length appeared .227~8.886, .033~24.575 on STS. SEM and SRD excepting COP path-length appeared about .019~3.933, .054~11.879 on gait. Conclusion: WBB is not only cheaper than force plate, but also easier to use clinically. WBB is considered as an adequate equipment for measuring changes of weight bearing during balance, STS and gait test which are normally used for functional assessment in patients with neurological problems and elderly. The further study is needed concurrent validity on neurological patients, elderly patients using force plate and WBB.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Beckerman H, Roebroeck ME, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res. 2001; 10(7):571-578. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013138911638
  2. Buatois S, Miljkovic D, Manckoundia P, et al. Five times sit to stand test is a predictor of recurrent falls in healthy community-living subjects aged 65 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(8):1575-1577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01777
  3. Chen KL, Chen CT, Chou YT, et al. Is the long form of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale more responsive than the short form in patients with stroke? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(5):941-949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.01.014
  4. de Oliveira Silva D, Briani R, Pazzinatto M, et al. Vertical ground reaction forces are associated with pain and self-reported functional status in recreational athletes with patellofemoral pain. J Appl Biomech. 2015;31(6):409-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jab.2015-0048
  5. Etnyre B, Thomas DQ. Event standardization of sit-tostand movements. Phys Ther. 2007;87(12):1651-1666. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060378
  6. Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, et al. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(2):75-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970410017215
  7. Goldsmith CH, Boers M, Bombardier C, et al. Criteria for clinically important changes in outcomes: Development, scoring and evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patient and trial profiles. OMERACT Committee. J Rheumatol. 1993;20(3):561-565.
  8. Han JT, Bae SS. Gait analysis methods and walking pattern of hemiplegic patients after stroke. Journal of the Korean Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Association. 2007;5(1):37-47.
  9. Harris GF, Wertsch JJ. Procedures for gait analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(2):216-225.
  10. Hsueh IP, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF, et al. Psychometric comparisons of 2 versions of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale and 2 versions of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(6):737-744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968308315999
  11. Hunt AE, Smith RM, Torode M, et al. Inter-segment foot motion and ground reaction forces over the stance phase of walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001;16(7):592-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00040-7
  12. Lee JH, Park SW, Kim DA, et al. Gait analysis using accelerometer in stroke patients. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2004;28(5):488-493.
  13. Liaw LJ, Hsieh CL, Lo SK, et al. The relative and absolute reliability of two balance performance measures in chronic stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(9):656-661. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701400698
  14. Lu WS, Wang CH, Lin JH, et al. The minimal detectable change of the simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement measure. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(8):615-619. http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0230
  15. Park DS, Lee DY, Choi SJ, et al. Reliability and validity of the Balancia using Wii balance board for assessment of balance with stroke patients. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 2013;14(6):2767-2772. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.6.2767
  16. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x
  17. Pohl PS, Duncan PW, Perera S, et al. Influence of strokerelated impairments on performance in 6-minute walk test. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002;39(4):439-444.
  18. Richman J, Makrides L, Prince B. Research methodology and applied statistics, part 3: Measurement procedures in research. Physiother Can. 1980;32: 253-257.
  19. Sacco IC, Akashi PM, Hennig EM. A comparison of lower limb EMG and ground reaction forces between barefoot and shod gait in participants with diabetic neuropathic and healthy controls. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-24
  20. Sharp SA, Brouwer BJ. Isokinetic strength training of the hemiparetic knee: Effects on function and spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(11): 1231-1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90337-3
  21. Yoshioka S, Nagano A, Himeno R, et al. Computation of the kinematics and the minimum peak joint moments of sit-to-stand movements. Biomed Eng Online. 2007;6:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-6-26

피인용 문헌

  1. A Comparison of Muscle Activation and Mechanical Loading according to the Degree of Ankle Joint Motion during a Sit-to-stand Task vol.12, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2017.12.4.113
  2. Wii Balance Board를 이용한 Sit-to-Stand와 보행시 지면반발력의 타당도 분석 vol.11, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2016.11.4.85
  3. Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces between female elderly and young adults during sit-to-stand and gait using the Nintendo Wii Balance Board vol.7, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2018.7.4.179
  4. Reliability and validity of pelvic mobility measurement using a cushion sensor in healthy adults vol.9, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2020.9.2.74
  5. Comparative Study of the Biomechanical Factors in Range of Motion, Muscle Activity, and Vertical Ground Reaction Force between a Forward Lunge and Backward Lunge vol.10, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2021.10.2.98