Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perception and action: Approach to convergence on embodied cognition

지각과 행위: 체화된 인지와의 융복합적 접근

  • Received : 2016.07.01
  • Accepted : 2016.08.20
  • Published : 2016.08.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Space perception is generally treated as a problem relevant to the ability to recognize objects. Alternatively, the data from shape perception studies contributes to discussions about the geometry of visual space. This geometry is generally acknowledged not to be Euclidian, but instead, elliptical, hyperbolic or affine, which is to say, something that admits the distortions found in so many shape perception studies. The purpose of this review article is to understand perceived shape and the geometry of visual space in the context of visually guided action. Thus, two prominent approaches that explain the relation between perception and action were compared. It is important to understand the fundamental information of how human perceive visual space and perform visually guided action for the convergence on embodied cognition, and further on artificial intelligence researches.

공간 지각은 일반적으로 물체(형태)를 인식하는 능력에 대한 문제로 여겨진다. 대안적으로, 형태 지각 연구는 시각 공간의 기하학에 관한 논의에 기여한다. 이러한 공간의 기하학은 일반적으로 유클리드가 아닌, 타원, 유사성, 또는 아핀(affine) 기하학으로 알려져 왔다. 다시 말해, 많은 형태 지각 연구들에서 보여 왔듯, 공간은 변형된 기하학으로 지각된다. 이 논문의 목적은 지각된 형태와 시각적으로 유도되는 행동과 관련된 시각 공간의 기하학에 대한 이해를 돕기 위함이다. 따라서 지각과 행위의 관계에 대해 설명하고 있는 두 이론을 비교해 본다. 제한된 인지와 더 나아가서, 인공 지능 연구와의 융합에 있어서 이러한 인간의 기본적인 공간 지각 능력과 시각적으로 유도되는 행위를 먼저 이해하는 것이 중요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. Lee, “A review of event perception: The first step for convergence on robotics,” Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 357-368, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.4.357
  2. V. Cornilleau-peres, and J. Droulez, "Visual perception of surface curvature: Psychophysics of curvature detection induced by motion parallax," Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 46, pp. 351-364, 1989. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204989
  3. J. F. Norman, and J. T. Todd, "The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations," Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 53, pp. 279-291, 1993. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205183
  4. V. J. Perotti, J. T. Todd, J. S. Lapp. in, and F. Phillips, "The perception of surface curvature from optical motion," Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 60, pp. 377-388, 1998. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206861
  5. E. B. Johnston, "Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis," Vision Research, Vol. 31, pp. 1351-1360, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(91)90056-B
  6. J. S. Tittle, J. T. Todd, V. J. Perotti, and J. F. Norman, "Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 21, pp. 663-678, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.663
  7. J. S. Tittle, and M. L. Braunstein, "Recovery of 3-D shape from binocular disparity and structure from motion," Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 54, pp. 157-169, 1993. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211751
  8. J. F. Norman, J. T. Todd, and F. Phillips, "The visual perception of surface orientation from multiple sources of optical information," Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 57, pp. 629-636, 1995. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213268
  9. J. T. Todd, and J. F. Norman, "The visual perception of 3-D shape from multiple cues: Are observers capable of perceiving metric structure?," Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 65, pp. 31-47, 2003. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194781
  10. E. Borjesson, and M. Lind, "The effect of polar projection on the perception of Euclidean structure from motion," Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 58, pp. 871-882, 1996. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205489
  11. J. J. Koenderink, and A. J. van Doorn, "Facts on optic flow," Biological Cybernetics, Vol. 56, pp. 247-254, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365219
  12. J. M. Loomis, and A. C. Beall, "Model-based control of perception/action," In L. M. Vaina, S. A. Beardsley, & S. K. Rushton (Eds.), Optic flow and beyond, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 421-441, 2004.
  13. M. I. Jordan, and D. M. Wolpert, "Computational motor control," In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 601-620, 1999.
  14. D. M. Wolpert, Z. Ghahramani, and M. I. Jordan, "An internal model for sensorimotor integration," Science, Vol. 269, pp. 1880-1882, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7569931
  15. J. M. Loomis, J. A. Da Silva, N. Fujita, and S. S. Fukusima, "Visual space perception and visually directed action," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 18, pp. 906-921, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.906
  16. S. S. Fukusima, J. M. Loomis, and J. A. Da Silva, "Visual perception distance as assessed by triangulation," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 23, pp. 86-100, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.23.1.86
  17. J. W. Philbeck, and J. M. Loomis, "Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 23, pp. 72-85, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.23.1.72
  18. W. H. Warren, and B. R. Fajen, "From optic flow to laws of control," In L. M. Vaina, S. A. Beardsley, & S. K. Rushton (Eds.), Optic flow and beyond, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 307-337, 2004.
  19. W. H. Warren, "The dynamics of perception and action," Psychological Review, Vol. 113, pp. 358-389, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.358
  20. E. C. Hildreth, J. M. H. Beusmans, E. R. Boer, and C. S. Royden, "From vision to action: Experiments and models of steering control during driving," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 6, pp. 1106-1132, 2000.
  21. G. Wallis, A. Chatziastros, and H. Bulthoff, "An unexpected role for visual feedback in vehicle steering control," Current Biology, Vol. 12, pp. 295-299, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00685-1
  22. G. P. Bingham, "Calibration of distance and size does not calibrate shape information: Comparison of dynamic monocular and static and dynamic binocular vision," Ecological Psychology, Vol. 17, pp. 55-74, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco1702_1
  23. G. P. Bingham, R. Coats, and M. Mon-Williams, "Unnatural prehension to virtual objects is not inevitable if calibration is allowed," Neuropsychologia, Vol. 45, pp. 288-294, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.07.011
  24. G. P. Bingham, F. Z. Zaal, D. Robin, and J. A. Shull, "Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback," Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 26, pp. 1436-1460, 2000.
  25. T. L. Ooi, B. Wu, and Z. J. He, "Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon," Nature, Vol. 414, pp. 197-200, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1038/35102562
  26. M. Mon-Williams, and G. P. Bingham, "Calibrating reach distance to visual targets," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 33, pp. 645-656, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.645
  27. W. H. Warren, "Visually controlled locomotion: 40 years later," Ecological Psychology, Vol. 10, pp. 177-219, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.1998.9652682
  28. D. N. Lee, "A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision," Perception, Vol. 5, pp. 437-459, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1068/p050437
  29. P. Foo, J. A. S. Kelso, and G. C. de Guzman, "Functional stabilization of unstable fixed points: Human pole balancing using time-to-balance information," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 26, pp. 1281-1297, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1281
  30. J. J. Rieser, H. L. Pick, D. H. Ashmead, and A. E. Garing, "Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 21, pp. 480-497, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.480
  31. C. C. Pagano, and G. P. Bingham, "Comparing measures of monocular distance perception: Verbal and reaching errors are not correlated," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 24, pp. 1037-1051, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1037
  32. Y. Lee, C. Crabtree, J. F. Norman, and G. P. Bingham, "Poor shape perception is the reason reaches-to-grasp are visually guided on-line," Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 70, pp. 1032-1046, 2008. https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.6.1032
  33. B. Nery, and R. Ventura, "A dynamical systems approach to online event segmentation in cognitive robotics," Paladyn, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 18-24, 2011.
  34. M. Lee, “A study on convergence development direction of gesture recognition game,” Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-7, 2014. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2014.5.4.001
  35. K. Lee, and K. Lee, “Authentication scheme using biometrics in intelligent vehicle network,” Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 15-20, 2013. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2013.4.3.015