DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Longitudinal Study on the Change of Marketing Perception and Positioning to Local Small Architectural Firms

지방 소형 건축사사무소의 마케팅 인식과 포지셔닝 변화 종단연구

  • Kim, Duk-Su (Department of Architecture, Hanbat National University)
  • 김덕수 (국립한밭대학교 건축학과)
  • Received : 2016.05.12
  • Accepted : 2016.08.12
  • Published : 2016.08.30

Abstract

The study was designed as a longitudinal study, utilizing 2010 and 2015 survey results to small local architectural firms in Daejeon. The research purpose was to generate a reference point for devising architectural marketing and position strategies. This longitudinal study found as follows. First, small architectural firms did not show clear understandings regarding the type and utility of architectural marketing. Second, project competition based on design fees was found under market conditions with the priority of best quotation principle. In internal positioning, a buyer's market caused both positioning of conservative operation and positioning of reduction in size. In external positioning, positioning as creativity-focused and local-based firms was strengthened. The research results can be a reference point for developing the success strategy of small architectural firms from a business perspective.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한밭대학교

References

  1. Anonymous. (2004). Architectural firms: Generalist v. specialist debate, New Jersey Business, 50(11), 36.
  2. Cohen, L., Wilkinson, A., Arnold, J., & Finn, R. (2005). 'Remember I'm the bloody architect!': Architects, organizations and discourses of profession, Work, Employment & Society, 19(4), 787.
  3. Coxe, W., Hartung, N.F., Hochberg, H., Lewis, B.J., Maister, D.H., Mattox, R.F., & Piven, P.A. (1987). Success Strategies for Design Professionals: Superpositioning for Architecture and Engineering Firms. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 79.
  4. Czarnecki, J.E. (2002). Taking a leap of faith why would a client entrust a young, untested firm with a project? Architectural Record, 190(12), 73.
  5. De Long, D.W., & Fahey, L. (2000). Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management, Academy of Management Executive, 14(4), 113-127.
  6. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality, in Powell, W., & DiMaggio, P.(Eds.). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
  7. Duffy, F., & Rabeneck, A. (2013). Professionalism and architects in the 21st century, Building Research & Information, 41(1), 118.
  8. Emmitt, S. (2009). Managing design effort in architectural offices, in Emmitt, S. et al.(Eds.) Architectural Management: International Research and Practice, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 281-282.
  9. Emmitt, S. (2014). Design Management for Architects, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 157.
  10. Evetts, J. (2011). A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities, Current Sociology, 59(4), 414.
  11. Flynn-Heapes, E. (2000). Creating Wealth: Principles and Practices for Design Firms, Sparks: The Center for Strategic Planning, 54-62.
  12. Franklin, J.R. (2000). Architect's Professional Practice Manual, New York, NY: MaGraw-Hill, 1.11.
  13. Haupt, E. (2002). The freedom of [advertising] rules, in Haupt, E. & Kubitza, M.(Eds.), Marketing and Communication for Architects-Fundamentals, Strategies and Practice, Basel: Birkhauser, 102.
  14. Jennings, J.E., Jennings, P.D., & Greenwood, R. (2006). The strategic positioning of professional service firm start-ups: Balance beguiles but purism pays, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 24, 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-558X(06)24003-5
  15. Jorgensen, P. (2001). Establishing your design firm as a values-based organization, Architectural Record, 189(9), 75-78.
  16. Kim, D.S. (2010). Recent history of professional service marketing and reality of large architectural firms in Korea, Architectural Research, 26(10), 127-137.
  17. Kolleeny, J.F., & Linn, C. (2002a). Small, medium, and large: Size and firm culture, Architectural Record, 190(6), 78-88.
  18. Kolleeny, J.F., & Linn, C. (2002b). Small, medium, and large: Which size is ideal for the future? Architectural Record, 190(8), 96-100.
  19. Kornberger, M., Kreiner K., & Clegg, S. (2011). The value of style in architectural practice, Culture and Organization, 17(2), 141, 152.
  20. Kreitl, G., Urschitz, G., & Oberndorfer, W.J. (2002). Corporate growth of engineering consulting firms: a European review, Construction Management and Economics, 20, 437-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190210139487
  21. Langdon, P. (1998). When bigger is better" A survey of "very large" firms indicates that economies of scale need to be balanced with creative management practices, Architectural Record, 186(8), 63.
  22. Leicht, K.T., & Lyman, E.C.W. (2006). Markets, institutions, and the crisis of professional practice, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 34, 40.
  23. Maister, D.H. (1993). Managing the Professional Service Firm, New York: The Free Press, 4-6.
  24. Oluwatayo, A., & Amole, D. (2012). Characteristics of global architectural firms, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(4), 393. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981211237102
  25. Pantiz, E., & Withey, J.J. (2006). Market attitudes and opinions of chief executive officers as predictors of small professional service firm performance, Service Marketing Quarterly, 28(2), 108.
  26. Piven, P. (2003). Practice matters: Starting a new firm, Architectural Record, 191(5), 99.
  27. Pressman, A. (2006). Professional Practice 101: Business Strategies and Case Studies in Architecture, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 71.
  28. Reigle, J. (2011). Positioning for Architecture and Design Firms, Hoboken: New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 15-16.
  29. Richardson, B. (2005). Marketing for Architects and Engineers: A New Approach, New York, NY: Taylor & Francis, 39.
  30. Schultz, M., Doerr, J.E., & Frederiksen, L.W. (2013). Professional Services Marketing(2nd Ed.), Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 196.
  31. Skaates, M.A., Tikkanen, H., & Alajoutsijarvi, K. (2002). Social and cultural capital in project marketing service firms: Danish architectural firms on the German market, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 18, 605.
  32. Smyth, H., & Kioussi, S. (2011). Architecture firms and the role of brand management, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 7, 205. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2011.594573
  33. Smyth, H. (2011). Structures, management and markets, in Smyth H.(Ed.) Managing the Professional Practice in the Built Environment, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 13-42.
  34. Styhre, A. (2011). The architect's gaze: The maintenance of collective professional vision in the work of the architect, Culture and Organization, 17(4), 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2011.590304
  35. Sullivan, C.C. (2004). Mature firms, Architect, 93(1), 24.
  36. von Nordenflycht, A. (2010). What is a professional service firms? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms, Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 155-174. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.45577926
  37. Williams T. (2010). Positioning for Professionals, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 41-42.
  38. Winch, G. (2011). Strategic management of professional practice: The case of architecture, in Smyth, H.(Ed.) Managing the Professional Practice: in the Built Environment, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 60-61.
  39. Winch, G., & Schneider, E. (1993). Managing the knowledge-based organization: The case of architectural practice, Journal of Management Studies, 30(6), November, 930.