DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the Performance of Water Electrolysis Cells and Stacks for High-Altitude Long Endurance Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

고고도 무인기용 수전해 셀 및 스택의 제작 및 성능 평가

  • Received : 2016.07.11
  • Accepted : 2016.08.30
  • Published : 2016.08.30

Abstract

The experiments related on structure and water electrolysis performance of HALE UAV stack were conducted in this study. Anode catalyst $IrRuO_2$ was prepared by Adam's fusion methods as 2~3 nm nano sized particles, and the cathode catalyst was used as commercial product of Premetek. The MEA (membrane electrode assembly) was manufactured by decal methods, anode and anode catalytic layers were prepared by electro-spray. HALE stack was composed of 5 multi-cells as $0.2Nm^3/hr$ hydrogen production rate with hydrogen pressure as 10 bar. The water electrolysis performance was investigated at atmospheric pressure and temperature of $55^{\circ}C$. Best performance of HALE UAV stack was recorded as cell voltage efficiency as 86%.

Keywords

References

  1. D.H. Lee, K.S. Paeng, Y.I. Kim, P.M. Par, S.M. Choi, H.I. Huh, The Present State of UAV Propulsion and Forecast of Next Generation UAV Propulsion. Trans. of the korean society of populsion engineers, 2009, pp. 557-560.
  2. T.G. Kim, H.C. Shim, S.J. Kwon, Development of Fuel Cell Power System for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Trans. of the Korean society of populsion engineers 2007, pp. 87-90.
  3. A survey study on the application of geophysical methods using UAV in polar region, Korea polar research institute, 2012.
  4. D.H. Lee et al., Technical survey on the classification and characteristics of UAV's power plant, Trans. of the Korean society of populsion engineers 2010, vol. 14(3), pp. 79-86.
  5. J.Cheng, H. Zhang,, G. Chen, Y. Zhang, Study of $Ir_xRu_{1-x}O_2$ oxides as anodic electrocatalysts for solid polymer electrolyte water electrolysis, J. Electrochimica Acta, 2009, vol.54(26), pp. 6250-6256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2009.05.090
  6. E. Rasten, G. Hagen, R. Tunold, J. Electrochim. Acta, 2003, vol. 48, pp. 3945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2003.04.001
  7. A. Marshall, B. Borresen, G. Hagen, M. Tsypkin, R. Tunold, Electrochim. Acta, 2006, vol.51, pp. 3161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2005.09.004
  8. A. Marshall, B. Borresen, G. Hagen, M. Tsypkin, R. Tunold, Mater. Chem. Phys. 2005, vol. 94, pp. 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.04.039
  9. H.S.Jang, and E.A.Cho Effect of additices and Hot-pressing conditions on the surface and performance of MEAs for PEMFCs., Trans. of the Korean Hydrogen and New Energy Society, 2010, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 398-404.
  10. C.Y.Wen, Y.S.Lin, C.H.Lu, Experimental study of clamping effects on the performances of a single proton exchange membrane fuel cell and a 10-cell stack. Journal of Power Sources, 2009, vol. 192.2, pp. 475-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.03.058
  11. S.P.S. Badwal, S.Giddey, F.T. Ciacchi, Hydrogen and oxygen generation with polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM)-based electrolytic technology. Ionics, 2006, vol. 12(1) pp. 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-006-0002-x
  12. S. A. GRIGORIEV, et al. High-pressure PEM water electrolysis and corresponding safety issues. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2011, Vol. 36.3, pp. 2721-2728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.058