Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimal Cultivation Time for Yeast and Lactic Acid Bacteria in Fermented Milk and Effects of Fermented Soybean Meal on Rumen Degradability Using Nylon Bag Technique

  • Polyorach, S. (Department of Animal Production Technology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang) ;
  • Poungchompu, O. (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology-Isan) ;
  • Wanapat, M. (Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Kang, S. (Agricultural Unit, Department of Education, National Institute of Education) ;
  • Cherdthong, A. (Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University)
  • Received : 2015.09.24
  • Accepted : 2015.12.18
  • Published : 2016.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to determine an optimal cultivation time for populations of yeast and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) co-cultured in fermented milk and effects of soybean meal fermented milk (SBMFM) supplementation on rumen degradability in beef cattle using nylon bag technique. The study on an optimal cultivation time for yeast and LAB growth in fermented milk was determined at 0, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post-cultivation. After fermenting for 4 days, an optimal cultivation time of yeast and LAB in fermented milk was selected and used for making the SBMFM product to study nylon bag technique. Two ruminal fistulated beef cattle ($410{\pm}10kg$) were used to study on the effect of SBMFM supplementation (0%, 3%, and 5% of total concentrate substrate) on rumen degradability using in situ method at incubation times of 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h according to a Completely randomized design. The results revealed that the highest yeast and LAB population culture in fermented milk was found at 72 h-post cultivation. From in situ study, the soluble fractions at time zero (a), potential degradability (a+b) and effective degradability of dry matter (EDDM) linearly (p<0.01) increased with the increasing supplemental levels and the highest was in the 5% SBMFM supplemented group. However, there was no effect of SBMFM supplement on insoluble degradability fractions (b) and rate of degradation (c). In conclusion, the optimal fermented time for fermented milk with yeast and LAB was at 72 h-post cultivation and supplementation of SBMFM at 5% of total concentrate substrate could improve rumen degradability of beef cattle. However, further research on effect of SBMFM on rumen ecology and production performance in meat and milk should be conducted using in vivo both digestion and feeding trials.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analyses, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.
  2. Boonnop, K., M. Wanapat, and C. Navanukraw. 2010. Replacement of soybean meal by yeast fermented-cassava chip protein (YEFECAP) in concentrate diets fed on rumen fermentation, microbial population and nutrient digestibilities in ruminants. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 9:1727-1734. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.1727.1734
  3. Boonnop, K., M. Wanapat, N. Nontaso, and S. Wanapat. 2009. Enriching nutritive value of cassava root by yeast fermentation. Sci. Agric. 66:629-633. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162009000500007
  4. Canibe, N. and B. B. Jensen. 2012. Fermented liquid feed-microbial and nutritional aspects and impact on enteric diseases in pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 173:17-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.021
  5. Chanjula, P., M. Wanapat, C. Wachirapakorn, S. Uriyapongson, and P. Rowlinson. 2003. Ruminal degradability of tropical feeds and their potential use in ruminant diets. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 16:211-216. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.211
  6. Chaucheyras-Durand, F., N. D. Walker, and A. Bach. 2008. Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: Past, present and future. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 145:5-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.019
  7. Chen, X. B. 1996. An Excel Application Program for Processing Feed Degradability Data. User Manual, Rowett Research Insitute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, UK.
  8. Doto, S. P. and J. X. Liu. 2011. Effects of direct-fed microbials and their combinations with yeast culture on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2:259-271.
  9. Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage Fiber Analysis (apparatus, reagent, procedures and some application). US Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC, USA.
  10. Jespersen, L. 2003. Occurrence and taxonomic characteristics of strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae predominant in African indigenous fermented foods and beverages. FEMS Yeast Res. 3:191-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-1356(02)00185-X
  11. Jouany, J. P. 2006. Optimizing rumen functions in the close-up transition period and early lactation to drive dry matter intake and energy balance in cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 96:250-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.08.005
  12. Kang, S., M. Wanapat, and A. Cherdthong. 2014. Effect of banana flower powder supplementation as a rumen buffer on rumen fermentation efficiency and nutrient digestibility in dairy steers fed on high concentrate diet. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 196:32-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.003
  13. Kang, S., M. Wanapat, A. Cherdthong, and K. Phesatcha. 2015. Comparison of banana flower powder and sodium bicarbonate supplementation on rumen fermentation and milk production in dairy cows. Anim. Prod. Sci., 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN15055
  14. Kebede, A., B. C. Viljoen, T. H. Gadaga, J. A. Narvhus, and A. Lourens-Hattingh. 2007. The effect of container type on the growth of yeast and lactic acid bacteria during production of sethemi, South African spontaneously fermented milk. Food Res. Int. 40:33-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2006.07.012
  15. Khuntia, A. and L. C. Chaudhary. 2002. Performance of male crossbred calves as influenced by substitution of grain by wheat bran and the addition of lactic acid bacteria to diet. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 15:188-194. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.188
  16. Khy, Y., M. Wanapat, T. Haitook, and A. Cherdthong. 2012. Effect of Leucaena Leucocephala pellet (LLP) supplementation on rumen fermentation efficiency and digestibility of nutrient in swamp buffalo. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 22:564-569.
  17. Malik, R. and D. D. Sharma. 1998. In vitro evaluation of different probiotics as feed supplement. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 51:357-362.
  18. Mathara, J. M., U. Schillinger, C. Guigas, C. Franz, P. M. Kutima, S. K. Mbugua, H. K. Shin, and W. H. Holzapfel. 2008. Functional characteristics of Lactobacillus spp. from traditional Maasai fermented milk products in Kenya. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 126:57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.04.027
  19. Mosoni, P., F. Chaucheyras-Durand, C. Bera-Maillet, and E. Forano. 2007. Quantification by real-time PCR of cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen of sheep after supplementation of a forage diet with readily fermentable carbohydrates: Effect of a yeast additive. J. Appl. Microbiol. 103:2676-2685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03517.x
  20. Narvhus, J. A. and T. H. Gadaga. 2003. The role of interaction between yeasts and lactic acid bacteria in African fermented milks: A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 86:51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00247-2
  21. Nasseri, A. T., S. Rasoul-Amini, M. H. Morowvat, and Y. Ghasemi. 2011. Single cell protein: Production and process. Am. J. Food Technol. 6:103-116. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajft.2011.103.116
  22. Oboh, G. and A. A. Akindahinsi. 2003. Biochemical changes in cassava products (flour and gari) subjected to Sacchromy cescerevisiae solid media fermentation. Food Chem. 82:599-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00016-5
  23. Orskov, E. R. and I. McDonald. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci. 92:499-503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048
  24. Polyorach, P., M. Wanapat, and S. Wanapat. 2012. Increasing protein content of cassava (Manihot esculenta, Crantz) using yeast in fermentation. Khon Kaen Agric. J.40:178-182.
  25. Polyorach, S., M. Wanapat, and A. Cherdthong. 2014a. Influence of yeast fermented cassava chip protein (YEFECAP) and roughage to concentrate ratio on ruminal fermentation and microorganisms using in vitro gas production technique. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 27:36-45. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13298
  26. Polyorach, S., M. Wanapat, and S. Wanapat. 2013. Enrichment of protein content in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) by supplementing with yeast for use as animal feed. Emir. J. Food Agric. 25:142-149. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.v25i2.10649
  27. Polyorach, S., O. Poungchompu, M. Wanapat, U. Supachat, O. Saihatwong, and G. Chaiyayong. 2014b. The improving of soybean meal nutritive value by using yeast and lactic acid bacteria in raw milk. Khon Kaen Agric. J. 42:358-362.
  28. Pond, W. G., D. C. Church, and K. R. Pond. 2005. Basic Animal Nutrition and Feeding. 5th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA.
  29. Salawu, M. B., A. T. Adesogan, C. N. Weston, and S. P. Williams. 2001. Dry matter yield and nutritive value of pea/wheat bi-crops differing in maturity at harvest, pea to wheat ratio and pea variety. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 94:77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00280-2
  30. SAS. 1998. User's Guide: Statistic, Version 6. 12th edn. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  31. Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. (2nd edn). McGraw Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, USA.
  32. Sugiharto, S., C. Lauridsen, and B. B. Jensen. 2015. Gastrointestinal ecosystem and immunological responses in E. coli challenged pigs after weaning fed liquid diets containing whey permeate fermented with different lactic acid bacteria. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 207:278-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.06.019
  33. Traore, I. A., G. C. Akouedegni, S. Babatounde, and R. H. Bosma. 2010. Effects of protein supplementation during the dry season on the feed intake and performances of Borgou cows in the sudanian zone of Benin. Adv. Anim. Biosci. 1:449-450. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2040470010000725
  34. Wanapat, M. and P. Rowlinson. 2007. Nutrition and feeding of swamp buffalo: Feed resources and rumen approach. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 6:67-73. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.s2.67
  35. Wanapat, M., S. Kang, and S. Polyorach. 2013. Development of feeding systems and strategies of supplementation to enhance rumen fermentation and ruminant production in the tropics. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 4:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-4-32
  36. Wanapat, M., S. Polyorach, V. Chanthakhoun, and N. Sornsongnern. 2011. Yeast-fermented cassava chip protein (YEFECAP) concentrate for lactating dairy cows fed on urea-lime treated rice straw. Livest. Sci. 139:258-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.01.016
  37. Wszolek, M., A. Y. Tamime, D. D. Muir, and M. N. I. Barclay. 2001. Properties of kefir made in Scotland and Poland using bovine, caprine, and ovine milk with different starter cultures. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 34:251-261. https://doi.org/10.1006/fstl.2001.0773
  38. Yamada, E. A. and V. C. Sgarbieri. 2005. Yeast (Saccha-romyces cerevisiae) protein concentrate: Preparation, chemical composition, and nutritional and functional properties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53:3931-3936. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0400821