대한인간공학회지 (Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea)

  • 제35권4호
  • /
  • Pages.225-235
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1229-1684(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-8462(eISSN)
대한인간공학회 (Ergonomics Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Predictive Model of Situation Awareness with ACT-R

  • Kim, Junghwan (Korea University, Department of Industrial Management Engineering) ;
  • Myung, Rohae (Korea University, Department of Industrial Management Engineering)
  • 투고 : 2016.03.17
  • 심사 : 2016.05.18
  • 발행 : 2016.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The aim of this study is to model all levels of situation awareness (SA), which would be able to predict situation awareness quantitatively. Background: When measuring situation awareness, directly measuring SA methods such as SAGAT and SART have been utilized. Several approaches (cognitive modeling approaches) were introduced to model SA but level 3 SA was not completed. For real-life situation, however, it is necessary to detect the problematic level of SA rather than overall SA. Therefore, we proposed a new model of all levels of SA in this study. Method: In order to model all levels of SA, this study chose factors in ACT-R architecture through literature review. ATC (Air Traffic Control)-related simulation task was video-taped to analyze human behaviors in order to model all levels of SA including level 3. Results: As a result, regression analyses show that cognitive activities (neural activations) represented for all levels of SA were highly correlated with SAGAT. Conclusion: In conclusion, neural activations in ACT-R could be proved to be effective to model all levels of SA. Application: Our SA model could be used to predict all levels of SA quantitatively without directly measuring the SA of operators.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anderson, J.R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M.D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C. and Qin, Y., An integrated theory of mind, Psychological Review, 111, 1036-1060, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1036
  2. Baumann, M.R. and Krems, J.F., A comprehension based cognitive model of situation awareness. In Digital Human Modeling (pp. 192-201). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
  3. Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., Harman, H.H. and Dermen, D., Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1976.
  4. Endsley, M.R., Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In Aerospace and Electronics Conference, 1988. NAECON 1988., Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National (pp. 789-795). IEEE, May 1988.
  5. Endsley, M.R., Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 32-64.a, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
  6. Endsley, M.R., Selcon, S.J., Hardiman, T.D. and Croft, D.G., A comparative analysis of SAGAT and SART for evaluations of situation awareness. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 82-86). SAGE Publications, October 1998.
  7. Endsley, M.R., Bolte, B. and Jones, D.G., Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User-Centered Design. 2003.
  8. Endsley, M.R., Situation awareness misconceptions and misunderstandings. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 9(1), 4-32, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343415572631
  9. Evertsz, R., Ritter, F.E., Busetta, P., Pedrotti, M. and Bittner, J.L., CoJACK-Achieving principled behaviour variation in a moderated cognitive architecture. In Proceedings of the 17th conference on behavior representation in modeling and simulation (pp. 80-89), 2008.
  10. Gibson, J., Orasanu, J., Villeda, E. and Nygren, T.E., Loss of situation awareness: Causes and consequences, Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 1417-1421). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, 1997.
  11. Hooey, B.L., Gore, B.F., Wickens, C.D., Scott-Nash, S., Socash, C., Salud, E. and Foyle, D.C., Modeling pilot situation awareness. In Human modelling in assisted transportation, (pp. 207-213). Springer Milan, 2011.
  12. Kaber, D.B., Perry, C.M., Segall, N., McClernon, C.K. and Prinzel, L.J., Situation awareness implications of adaptive automation for information processing in an air traffic control-related task. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36(5), 447-462, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2006.01.008
  13. Klauer, S.G., Dingus, T.A., Neale, V.L., Sudweeks, J.D. and Ramsey, D.J., The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk:An analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data (No. HS-810 594), 2006.
  14. Liu, S., Wanyan, X. and Zhuang, D., Modeling the situation awareness by the analysis of cognitive process. Bio-medical materials and engineering, 24(6), 2311-2318, 2014. https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-141044
  15. Loft, S., Bowden, V., Braithwaite, J., Morrell, D.B., Huf, S. and Durso, F.T., Situation awareness measures for simulated submarine track management. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 57(2), 298-310, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814545515
  16. Ma, R. and Kaber, D.B., Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35(10), 939-953, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2005.04.002
  17. Riley, J.M., Endsley, M.R., Bolstad, C.A. and Cuevas, H.M., Collaborative planning and situation awareness in Army command and control. Ergonomics, 49(12-13), 1139-1153, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130600612614
  18. Ritter, F.E., Kase, S.E., Bhandarkar, D., Lewis, B. and Cohen, M.A., dTank updated: exploring moderated behavior in a light-weight synthetic environment. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation (pp. 51-60), 2007.
  19. Salmon, P.M., Stanton, N.A., Walker, G.H., Jenkins, D., Ladva, D., Rafferty, L. and Young, M., Measuring Situation Awareness in complex systems: Comparison of measures study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(3), 490-500, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.010
  20. Sulistyawati, K., Wickens, C.D. and Chui, Y.P., Prediction in situation awareness: Confidence bias and underlying cognitive abilities. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 21(2), 153-174, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2011.556492
  21. Tsang, P.S. and Vidulich, M.A., Mental workload and situation awareness. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Third Edition, 243-268, 2006.
  22. Yang, J.Z. and Zhang, K., Situation awareness: approaches, measures and applications, Advances in Psychological Science, 12, 842-850, 2004.