DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Failure of circular tunnel in saturated soil subjected to internal blast loading

  • Han, Yuzhen (Beijing Urban Construction Design & Development Group Co., Limited) ;
  • Liu, Huabei (School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2015.11.04
  • 심사 : 2016.05.13
  • 발행 : 2016.09.25

초록

Explosions inside transportation tunnels might result in failure of tunnel structures. This study investigated the failure mechanisms of circular cast-iron tunnels in saturated soil subjected to medium internal blast loading. This issue is crucial to tunnel safety as many transportation tunnels run through saturated soils. At the same time blast loading on saturated soils may induce residual excess pore pressure, which may result in soil liquefaction. A series of numerical simulations were carried out using Finite Element program LS-DYNA. The effect of soil liquefaction was simulated by the Federal Highway soil model. It was found that the failure modes of tunnel lining were differed with different levels of blast loading. The damage and failure of the tunnel lining was progressive in nature and they occurred mainly during lining vibration when the main event of blast loading was over. Soil liquefaction may lead to more severe failure of tunnel lining. Soil deformation and soil liquefaction were determined by the coupling effects of lining damage, lining vibration, and blast loading. The damage of tunnel lining was a result of internal blast loading as well as dynamic interaction between tunnel lining and saturated soil, and stress concentration induced by a ventilation shaft connected to the tunnel might result in more severe lining damage.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ashford, S.A., Rollins, K.M. and Lane, J.D. (2004), "Blast-induced liquefaction for full-scale foundation testing", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., ASCE, 130(8), 798-806. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(798)
  2. Chakraborty, T., Larcher, M. and Gebbeke, N. (2014), "Performance of tunnel lining materials under internal blast loading", Int. J. Protect. Struct., 5(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1260/2041-4196.5.1.83
  3. Choi, S., Wang, J., Munfakh, G. and Dwyre, E. (2006), "3D nonlinear blast model analysis for underground structures", Proceedings of GeoCongress, ASCE, New York, NY, USA, February, pp. 1-6.
  4. Chou, H.S., Yang, C.Y., Hsieh, B.J. and Chang, S.S. (2001), "A study of liquefaction related damages on shield tunnels", Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 16(3), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00057-8
  5. Davis, J.R. (1996) Cast Irons, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, USA.
  6. De, A. (2012), "Numerical simulation of surface explosions over dry, cohesionless soil", Comput. Geotech., 43, 72-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.02.007
  7. Desai, C.S., Zaman, M.M., Lightner, J.G. and Siriwardane, H.J. (1984), "Thin-layer element for interface and joints", Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., 8(1), 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610080103
  8. Farr, J.V. (1990), "One-dimensional loading-rate effects", J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE, 116(1), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:1(119)
  9. Feldgun, V.R., Kochetkov, A.V., Karinskia, Y.S. and Yankelevsky, D.S. (2008), "Blast response of a lined cavity in a porous saturated soil", Int. J. Impact Eng., 35(3), 953-966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.06.010
  10. Fragaszy, R.J. and Voss, M.E. (1986), "Undrained compression behavior of sand", J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE, 112 (3), 334-347.
  11. Han, Y. and Liu, H. (2015), "Finite Element simulation of medium-range blast loading using LS-DYNA", Shock Vib., Article ID 631493.
  12. He, W., Chen, J.Y. and Guo, J. (2011), "Dynamic analysis of subway station subjected to internal blast loading", J. Central South Univ. Technol., 18(3), 917-924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-011-0781-8
  13. Jayasinghe, L.B., Thambiratnam, D.P., Perera, N. and Jayasooriya, J.H.A.R. (2013), "Computer simulation of underground blast response of pile in saturated soil", Comput. Struct., 120, 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.02.016
  14. Jayasinghe, L.B., Thambiratnam, D.P., Perera, N. and Jayasooriya, J.H.A.R. (2014), "Blast response of reinforced concrete pile using fully coupled computer simulation techniques", Comput. Struct., 135, 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.01.017
  15. Koneshwaran, S., Thambiratnam, D. and Gallage, C. (2015), "Performance of buried tunnels subjected to surface blast incorporating fluid-structure interaction", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., ASCE, 29(3), 04014084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000585
  16. Lewis, B.A. (2004), Manual for LS-DYNA Soil Material Model 147; Technical Publication No. FHWAHRT-04-095, Federal Highway Administration, Washington D.C., USA
  17. Liu, H. (2009), "Dynamic analysis of subway structures under blast loading", Geotech. Geol. Eng., 27(6), 699-711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-009-9269-9
  18. Liu, H. (2012), "Soil-structure interaction and failure of cast-iron subway tunnels subjected to medium internal blast loading", J. Perform. Construct. Facil., ASCE, 26(5), 691-701. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000292
  19. Liu, H. and Nezili, S. (2016), "Centrifuge modeling of underground tunnel in saturated soil subjected to internal blast loading", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., ASCE, 30, 06015001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000760
  20. Liu, H. and Song, E. (2006), "Working mechanism of cutoff walls in reducing uplift of large underground structures induced by soil liquefaction", Comput. Geotech., 33(4-5), 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2006.07.002
  21. LS-DYNA (2012a), Version 971 R6.0.0 Keyword User's Manual; Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), CA, USA
  22. LS-DYNA (2012b), Version 971 R6.0.0 Theory Manual; Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), CA, USA.
  23. Lu, Y., Wang, Z. and Chong, K. (2005), "A comparative study of buried structure in soil subjected to blast load using 2D and 3D numerical simulations", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 25(4), 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.02.007
  24. UFC 3-340-02 (2008), Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions; Department of the Army and Defense Special Weapons Agency, Washington D.C., USA.
  25. Veyera, G.E. and Charlie, W.A. (1990), "Laboratory study of compressional liquefaction", J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE, 116(5), 790-804. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:5(790)
  26. Wang, Z., Lu, Y. and Bai, C. (2008), "Numerical analysis of blast-induced liquefaction of soil", Comput. Geotech., 35(2), 196-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.04.006
  27. Xu, T.H. and Zhang, L.M. (2015), "Numerical implementation of a bounding surface plasticity model for sand under high strain-rate loadings in LS-DYNA", Comput. Geotech., 66, 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.02.002

피인용 문헌

  1. Roof failure of shallow tunnel based on simplified stochastic medium theory vol.14, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2018.14.6.571
  2. New methodology to prevent blasting damages for shallow tunnel vol.15, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2018.15.6.1227
  3. Field measurement and numerical simulation of excavation damaged zone in a 2000 m-deep cavern vol.16, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2018.16.4.399
  4. Investigation on the propagation mechanism of explosion stress wave in underground mining vol.17, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2019.17.3.295
  5. Blasting Response of a Two-Storey RC Building Under Different Charge Weight of TNT Explosives vol.44, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00256-0
  6. Incorporating ground motion effects into Sasaki and Tamura prediction equations of liquefaction-induced uplift of underground structures vol.22, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.22.1.025
  7. Effect of shear zone on dynamic behaviour of rock tunnel constructed in highly weathered granite vol.23, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.23.3.245
  8. Dynamic stability analysis of rock tunnels subjected to impact loading with varying UCS vol.24, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2021.24.6.505