Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A dominant vibration mode-based scalar ground motion intensity measure for single-layer reticulated domes

  • Zhong, Jie (Key Laboratory of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control of the Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology) ;
  • Zhi, Xudong (Key Laboratory of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control of the Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology) ;
  • Fan, Feng (Key Laboratory of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control of the Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology)
  • Received : 2015.04.23
  • Accepted : 2016.07.12
  • Published : 2016.08.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A suitable ground motion intensity measure (IM) plays a crucial role in the seismic performance assessment of a structure. In this paper, we introduce a scalar IM for use in evaluating the seismic response of single-layer reticulated domes. This IM is defined as the weighted geometric mean of the spectral acceleration ordinates at the periods of the dominant vibration modes of the structure considered, and the modal strain energy ratio of each dominant vibration mode is the corresponding weight. Its applicability and superiority to 11 other existing IMs are firstly investigated in terms of correlation with the nonlinear seismic response, efficiency and sufficiency using the results of incremental dynamic analyses which are performed for a typical single-layer reticulated dome. The hazard computability of this newly proposed IM is also briefly discussed and illustrated. A conclusion is drawn that this dominant vibration mode-based scalar IM has the characteristics of strong correlation, high efficiency, good sufficiency as well as hazard computability, and thereby is appropriate for use in the prediction of seismic response of single-layer reticulated domes.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Scholarship Council

References

  1. ATC (2009), FEMA P695: Quantification of building seismic performance factors, ATC-63, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, USA.
  2. Bazzurro, P. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Vector-valued probabilistic seismic hazard analysis", Proceedings of the 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Massachusetts, USA.
  3. Bianchini, M., Diotallevi, P.P. and Baker, J.W. (2009), "Prediction of inelastic structural response using an average of spectral accelerations", Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR09), Osaka, Japan.
  4. Bojorquez, E. and Iervolino, I. (2011), "Spectral shape proxies and nonlinear structural response", Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 31(7), 996-1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.03.006
  5. BSSC (1997), NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA-273, developed by ATC for FEMA, Washington, D.C., USA.
  6. Chopra, A.K. (2001), Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.
  7. Cordova, P.P., Deierlein, G.G., Mehanny, S.S.F. and Cornell, C.A. (2000), "Development of a two-parameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure", Proceedings of the 2nd U.S.-Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Seismic Design Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, California, USA.
  8. Cornell, C.A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R.O. and Foutch, D.A. (2002), "Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines", J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 526-533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)
  9. Ellingwood, R.R., Celik, O.C. and Kinali, K. (2007), "Fragility assessment of building structural systems in Mid-America", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(13), 1935-1952. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.693
  10. Fan, F., Li, Y.G. and Hong, H.P. (2012), "Study on one-dimensional earthquake intensities for Kiewitt-8 single-layer reticulated domes", J. Build. Struct., 33(12), 72-78.
  11. GB50011-2010 (2010), Code for seismic design of buildings, China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing.
  12. Giovenale, P., Cornell, C.A. and Esteva, L. (2004), "Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33(8), 951-979. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.386
  13. Inoue, T. and Cornell, C.A. (1990), "Seismic hazard analysis of multi-degree-of-freedom structures", Reliability of marine structures, RMS-8. Stanford University, CA, USA.
  14. Jayaram, N., Bazzurro, P., Mollaioli, F., Sortis, A.D. and Bruno, S. (2010), "Prediction of structural response in reinforced concrete frames subjected to earthquake ground motions", Proceedings of the 9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Toronto, Canada.
  15. JGJ7-2010 (2010), Technical Specification for Space Frame Structures, China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing, China.
  16. Kato, S., Nakazawa, S. and Saito, K. (2007), "Estimation of static seismic loads for latticed domes supported by substructure frames with braces deteriorated due to buckling", J. Int. Assoc. Shell Spatial Struct., 48(2), 71-86.
  17. Kostinakis, K.G. and Athanatopoulou, A.M. (2015), "Evaluation of scalar structure-specific ground motion intensity measures for seismic response prediction of earthquake resistant 3D buildings", Earthq. Struct., 9(5), 1091-1114. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.5.1091
  18. Luco, N. and Cornell, A.C. (2007), "Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions", Earthq. Spectra., 23(2), 357-392. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2723158
  19. Luco, N., Manuel, L., Baldava, S. and Bazzurro, P. (2005), "Correlation of damage of steel moment-resisting frames to a vector-valued set of ground motion parameter", Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR05), Rome, Italy.
  20. Nie, G.B., Fan, F. and Zhi, X.D. (2012), "A constitutive model for circular steel pipe by spatial hysteretic test", Adv. Struct. Eng., 15(8), 1279-1290. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.15.8.1279
  21. Nielson, B.G. and DesRoches, R. (2007), "Analytical seismic fragility curves for typical bridges in the central and southeastern United States", Earthq. Spectra., 23(3), 615-633. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2756815
  22. Padgett, J.E., Nielson, B.G. and DesRoches, R. (2008), "Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(5), 711-725. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.782
  23. Shome, N. (1999), "Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of non-linear structures", Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, CA, USA.
  24. Shome, N., Cornell, C.A., Bazzurro, P. and Carballo, J.E. (1998), "Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses", Earthq. Spectra, 14(3), 469-500. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586011
  25. Stewart, J.P., Chiou, S.J., Bray, J.D., Somerville, P.G. and Abrahamson, N.A. (2002), "Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design", Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 22(9), 765-772. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00097-0
  26. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  27. Yang, D.B., Zhang, Y.G. and Wu, J.Z. (2010), "Computation of Rayleigh damping coefficients in seismic time-history analysis of spatial structures", J. Int. Assoc. Shell Spatial Struct., 51(2), 125-135.
  28. Zhi, X.D., Nie, G.B., Fan, F. and Shen, S.Z. (2012), "Vulnerability and risk assessment of single-layer reticulated domes subjected to earthquakes", J. Struct. Eng., 138(12), 125-135.

Cited by

  1. Sensitivity of Seismic Response and Fragility to Parameter Uncertainty of Single-Layer Reticulated Domes pp.2093-6311, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0057-3
  2. An ESED method for investigating seismic behavior of single-layer spherical reticulated shells vol.13, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.5.455
  3. The dynamic response and seismic damage of single-layer reticulated shells subjected to near-fault ground motions vol.14, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.5.399