DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison of the Reliability Estimation Accuracy between Bayesian Methods and Classical Methods Based on Weibull Distribution

와이블분포 하에서 베이지안 기법과 전통적 기법 간의 신뢰도 추정 정확도 비교

  • Cho, HyungJun (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Kyonggi University Graduate School) ;
  • Lim, JunHyoung (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Kyonggi University) ;
  • Kim, YongSoo (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Kyonggi University)
  • 조형준 (경기대학교 일반대학원 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 임준형 (경기대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 김용수 (경기대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Received : 2016.02.05
  • Accepted : 2016.05.25
  • Published : 2016.08.15

Abstract

The Weibull is widely used in reliability analysis, and several studies have attempted to improve estimation of the distribution's parameters. least squares estimation (LSE) or Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) are often used to estimate distribution parameters. However, it has been proven that Bayesian methods are more suitable for small sample sizes than LSE and MLE. In this work, the Weibull parameter estimation accuracy of LSE, MLE, and Bayesian method are compared for sample sets with 3 to 30 data points. The Bayesian method was most accurate for sample sizes under 25, and the accuracy of the Bayesian method was similar to LSE and MLE as the sample size increased.

Keywords

References

  1. Achcar, J., Moala, F., and Boleta, J. (2015), Generalized exponential distribution : A Bayesian approach using MCMC methods, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 6(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2014.8.002
  2. Ahmed, A. O. M., Al-Kutubi, H. S., and Ibrahim, N. A. (2010), Comparison of the Bayesian and maximum likelihood estimation for Weibull distribution. journal of mathematics and statistics, 6(2), 100-104. https://doi.org/10.3844/jmssp.2010.100.104
  3. Ait Saadi, H., Ykhlef, F., and Guessoum, A. (2011), MCMC for parameters estimation by Bayesian approach, 2011 8th Int. Multi-Conf. on IEEE, In Systems, Signals and Devices (SSD), 1-6.
  4. Genschel, U. and Meeker, W. Q. (2010), A comparison of maximum likelihood and median-rank regression for Weibull estimation, Quality Engineering, 22(4), 236-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2010.503447
  5. Gibbons, D. I. and Vance, L. C. (1981), A simulation study of estimators for the 2-parameter Weibull distribution, Reliability, IEEE Transactions on, 30(1), 61-66.
  6. Hamada, M. S., Wilson, A. G., Reese, C. S., and Martz, H. F. (2008), Bayesian Reliability, Springer Verlag.
  7. Hao, H. and Su, C. (2014), A Bayesian Framework for Reliability Assessment via Wiener Process and MCMC, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014.
  8. Huang, H. Z., Zuo, M. J., and Sun, Z. Q. (2006), Bayesian reliability analysis for fuzzy lifetime data, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157(12), 1674-1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2005.11.009
  9. Ibrahim, N. A., Adam, M. B., and Arasan, J. (2012), Bayesian survival and hazard estimate for Weibull censored time distribution, Journal of Applied Sciences, 12(12), 1313. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2012.1313.1317
  10. Kim, D. K., Kang, W. S., and Kang, S. J. (2013), A Study on the Storage Reliability Determination Model for One-shot System, Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 38(1), 1-13.
  11. Kim, S. I., Park, M. Y., and Park, J. W. (2010), A Comparison of Estimation Methods for Weibull Distribution and Type I Censoring, Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 38(4), 480-490.
  12. Lee, W. D., Lee, C.-S., and Kang, S.-G. (1998), An Estimation of Parameters in Weibull Distribution using Gibbs Sampler, Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, 3(1), 13-21.
  13. Li, H., Zhang, Z., Hu, Y., and Zheng, D. (2009), Maximum likelihood estimation of weibull distribution based on random censored data and its application, Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety (ICRMS'09), 302-304.
  14. Li, H., Yuan, R., Peng, W., Liu, Y., and Huang, H. Z. (2011), Bayesian inference of Weibull distribution based on probability encoding method, 2011 Int. Conf. on IEEE, In Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering(ICQR2MSE), 365-369.
  15. Lin, J. (2014), An Integrated Procedure for Bayesian Reliability Inference Using MCMC, Journal of Quality and Reliability Engineering, 2014.
  16. Ramakumar, R. (1993), Engineering reliability: fundamentals and applications, Prentice-Hall.
  17. Yum, B. J., Seo, S. K., Yun, W. Y., and Byun, J. H. (2014), Trends and Future Directions of Quality Control and Reliability Engineering, Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 40(6), 526-554. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2014.40.6.526
  18. Zaidi, A., Ould Bouamama, B., and Tagina, M. (2012), Bayesian reliability models of Weibull systems : State of the art, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 22(3), 585-600. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10006-012-0045-2