참고문헌
- 강경희 (2010). 과학영재교육 관련 국내 연구 동향. 한국과학교육학회지, 30(1), 54-67.
- 강호감, 최선영 (2004). 과학영재교육 담당교원의 전문성 개발에 관한 연구. 과학교육논총, 16, 137-160.
- 김경진, 권병두, 김찬종, 최승언 (2005). 과학영재 학교 과학교사들의 영재교육에 대한 신념과 교수활동 유형. 한국과학교육학회지, 25(4), 514-525.
- 김선경, 백성혜 (2011). 중학교 과학 영재 담당 교사의 수업 전략 특징 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 31(2), 295-313.
- 김홍원, 조석희, 이윤식, 박주상 (2000). 영재교육 담당 교원 양성 및 임용 방안에 대한 연구. 수탁연구 CR2000-16. 한국교육개발원.
- 류지영 (2005). 미국 영재교원 양성체제가 한국 영재교원 양성 체제에 주는 시사. 한국교원교육학회지, 22(1), 69-88.
- 박선자, 최경희, 이현주 (2009). 교육청 영재 교육원 과학 담당 교사들의 영재성에 대한 인식. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 9(2), 119-137.
- 박지은, 이봉우 (2012). 과학 영재교육 담당교사의 영재교육 전문성에 대한 인식. 교과교육학연구, 16(2), 587-601.
- 서혜애, 박경희 (2005). 과학 영재 교육 교사 교수 방법 전문 지식 측정 도구 개발. 한국교원교육연구, 22(2), 159-180.
- 서혜애, 박경희 (2010). 중학교 과학영재교육 교사 전문성에 대한 질적 연구. 교사교육연구, 49(2), 171-193.
- 서혜애, 박경희, 박지은 (2007). 과학영재교육 교사 교수방법 전문지식의 수준 분석. 교과교육학연구, 11(1), 1-14.
- 서혜애, 손연아 (2003). 영재교육기관 교수.학습 실태 분석. CR2003-26, 한국교육개발원.
- 심규철, 김현섭 (2006). 지역 영재교육원 과학영재 교육 담당교사의 영재교육에 대한 인식 조사. 한국생물학회지, 34(4), 479-484.
- 이효녕, 손동일, 권혁수, 박경숙, 한인기, 정현일, 이성수, 오희진, 남정철, 오영재, 방성혜 (2012). 통합 STEM 교육에 대한 중등 교사의 인식과 요구. 한국과학교육학회지, 32(1), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.1.030
- 장영숙, 강경석 (1999). 영재교육 담당교사의 자질 향상 및 전문성 개발에 관한 연구. 영재교육연구, 9(2), 1-22.
- 최병연, 이면우 (2008). 영재담당 초임교사의 영재 교육에 대한 신념과 수업 특성. 영재와영재교육, 7(1), 95-114.
- 최호성, 남정희, 박수경, 서혜애, 주동범 (2004). 과학영재학교 운영 실태 분석 및 평가 방안 연구. 한국과학재단.
- 한기순, 이현주 (2011). 바람직한 초등 영재교사의 자질에 대한 교사의 인식: 개념도 접근. 아시아교육연구, 12(4), 171-191.
- Bangel, N., Enersen, D. J., Capobianco, B., & Moon, S. M. (2006). Professional development of preservice teachers: Teaching in the super saturday program. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29(3), 339-361. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320602900305
- Beijaard, D., Van Driel, J., & Verloop, N. (1999). Evaluation of story-line methodology in research on teachers' practical knowledge. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 25(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(99)00009-7
- Black, A. L., & Halliwell, G. (2000). Accessing practical knowledge: How? Why?. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(1), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00045-1
- Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and Quantity, 36(4), 391-409. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020909529486
- Bain, S. K., Bliss, S. L., Choate, S. M., & Sager-Brown, K. (2007). Serving children who are gifted: Perceptions of undergraduates planning to become teachers. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(4), 450-478. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2007-506
- Chamberlin, M. T., & Chamberlin, S. A. (2010). Enhancing preservice teacher development: Field experiences with gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(3), 381-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321003300305
- Chamberlin, S. A., & Moore, A. (2006). Cognizance of gifted education among elementary education professors in MCREL member states. Roeper Review, 29(1), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554384
- Chan, D. W. (2001). Characteristics and competencies of teachers of gifted learners: The Hong Kong teacher perspective. Roeper Review, 23(4), 197-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190109554098
- Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (1988). Education of the gifted and talented (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Deizman, C. M., & Watters, J. (2001). The collaboration of mathematically gifted students on challenging tasks. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25(1), 7-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320102500102
- Feldhusen, J. F., & Hansen, J. (1988). Teachers of the gifted: Preparation and supervision. Gifted Education International, 5(2), 84-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142948800500206
- Gan, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2007). A learning framework for knowledge building and collective wisdom advancement in virtual learning communities. Educational Technology & Society, 10(1), 206-226.
- Hanninen, G. E. (1988). A study of teacher training in gifted education. Roeper Review, 10(3), 139-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198809553109
- Hansen, J. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(3), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629403800304
- Joffe, W. S. (2001). Investigating the acquisition of pedagogical knowledge: Interviews with a beginning teacher of the gifted. Roeper Review, 23(4), 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190109554108
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2007). What predicts teachers' attitudes toward the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 246-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207302719
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman. A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). London.
- Newman, J. L., & Hubner, J. P. (2012). Designing challenging science experiences for high-ability learners through partnerships with university professors. Gifted Child Today, 35(2), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217511436093
- Park, S., & Oliver, S. J. (2009). The translation of teachers' understanding of gifted students into instructional strategies for teaching science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(4), 333-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9138-7
- Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & F. Davision (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press.
- Sternberg, R. J. (1994). A pentagonal implicit theory of giftedness. In F. D. Horowitz & D. Friedman (Eds.), Developmental approaches to identifying exceptional abilities. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Tomlinson, C. A. (2002). Different learners, different lessons. Instructor, 112(2), 21-26.
- Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2005). Acceleration strategies for teaching gifted learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
- Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
- Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 441-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00003-4
- Westberg, K. L., Archambault, F. X., Jr., Dobyns, S. M., & Salvin, T. J. (1993). An observational study of instructional and curricular practices used with gifted and talented students in regular classrooms. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
- Whitlock, M. S., & DuCette, J. P. (1989). Outstanding and average teachers of the gifted: A comparative study. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 33(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628903300103
- Witz, K. (2006). The participant as ally and essentialist portraiture. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 246-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284365
- Yang, M. (2011). Exploring the principles of collaborative learning for realization of collective intelligence. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 23(2), 457-483.