행위가독성(Legibility)을 고려한 인간-로봇 상호작용 기술 동향

  • Published : 2016.07.29

Abstract

로봇의 활동 영역이 사람의 활동 영역과 점점 더 크게 겹쳐지면서 로봇이 사람과 무리없이 공존하는데 필요한 기술에 대한 요구가 심화되고 있다. 행위가독성은 겉으로 드러난 로봇의 행위를 기반으로 얼마나 쉽고 빠르게 로봇의 행위 의도를 판단할 수 있는지를 나타내는 지표로서 로봇과 상호작용하는 사람의 심리적이고 물리적인 부담을 최소화하는데 결정적인 요소로 받아들여지고 있다. 많은 연구를 통해 로봇 행위의 가독성이 높으면 사람이 더 빠르고 명료하게 로봇의 의도를 인지할 수 있고 그 결과 사람의 안전과 심리적 안정이 향상될 뿐 아니라 사람과 로봇 간 협업의 효율도 높아진다는 사실이 밝혀졌다. 이 글에서는 행위가독성의 개념을 소개하고 행위가독성을 향상하는 대표적 연구 사례들을 살펴본다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aibo's History. [Online] http://www.sony-aibo.com/aibos-history/
  2. iRobot History. [Online]: http://www.irobot.com/About-iRobot/Company-Information/History.aspx
  3. K. Dautenhahn, S. Woods, C. Kaouri, M. L. Walters, K. L. Koay, I. Werry, What is a Robot Companion-friend, Assistant or Butler, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 2005, pp. 1192-1197.
  4. F. Eyssel, D. Kuchenbrandt, S. Bobinger, Effects of anticipated human-robot interaction and predictability of robot behavior on perceptions of anthropomorphism, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction. ACM, 2011, pp. 61-68.
  5. C. L. Nehaniv, K. Dautenhahn, J. Kubacki, M. Haegele, C. Parlitz, R. Alami, A methodological approach relating the classification of gesture to identification of human intent in the context of humanrobot interaction, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005. IEEE, 2005, pp. 371-377.
  6. A. Clodic, V. Montreuil, R. Alami, R. Chatila, A decisional framework for autonomous robots interacting with humans, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005. IEEE, 2005, pp. 543-548.
  7. E. A. Sisbot, L. F. Marin-Urias, R. Alami, T. Simeon, A human aware mobile robot motion planner, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 874-883, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2007.904911
  8. A. Kirsch, T. Kruse, E. A. Sisbot, R. Alami, M. Lawitzky, D. Brscic, S. Hirche, P. Basili, S. Glasauer, Plan-based control of joint human-robot activities, KI-Kunstliche Intelligenz, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 223-231, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-010-0043-1
  9. E. A. Sisbot, L. F. Marin-Urias, X. Broquere, D. Sidobre, R. Alami, Synthesizing robot motions adapted to human presence, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 329-343, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0059-6
  10. M. Beetz, F. Stulp, P. Esden-Tempski, A. Fedrizzi, U. Klank, I. Kresse, A. Maldonado, F. Ruiz, Generality and legibility in mobile manipulation, Autonomous Robots, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 21-44, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-009-9152-9
  11. J. Guzzi, A. Giusti, L. M. Gambardella, G. Theraulaz, G. A. Di Caro, Human-friendly robot navigation in dynamic environments, Robotics Automation (ICRA), 2013 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2013, pp. 423-430.
  12. E. A. Sisbot, R. Alami, A human-aware manipulation planner, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1045-1057, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2012.2196303
  13. T. Kruse, P. Basili, S. Glasauer, A. Kirsch, Legible robot navigation in the proximity of moving humans, Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO), 2012 IEEE Workshop on. IEEE, 2012, pp. 83-88.
  14. C. Lichtenthäler, T. Lorenz, M. Karg, A. Kirsch, Increasing perceived value between human robots - measuring legibility in human aware navigation, in Advanced Robotics its Social Impacts (ARSO), 2012 IEEE Workshop on. IEEE, 2012, pp. 89-94.
  15. L. Takayama, D. Dooley, W. Ju, Expressing thought: improving robot readability with animation principles, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction. ACM, 2011, pp. 69-76.
  16. K. W. Strabala, M. K. Lee, A. D. Dragan, J. L. Forlizzi, S. Srini- vasa, M. Cakmak, V. Micelli, Towards seamless human-robot handovers, Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 112-132, 2013.
  17. T. Kruse, A. Kirsch, E. A. Sisbot, R. Alami, Exploiting human cooperation in human-centered robot navigation, 19th International Symposium in Robot Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 2010, pp. 192-197.
  18. H. Admoni, A. Dragan, S. S. Srinivasa, B. Scassellati, Deliberate delays during robot-to-human handovers improve compliance with gaze communication, Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction. ACM, 2014, pp. 49-56.
  19. D. Bortot, M. Born, K. Bengler, Directly or on detours? how should industrial robots approximate humans?, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 2013, pp. 89-90.
  20. F. Dehais, E. A. Sisbot, R. Alami, M. Causse, Physiological subjective evaluation of a human-robot object hand-over task, Applied ergonomics, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 785-791, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.12.005
  21. A.D. Dragan, K.C. Lee, S. S. Srinivasa, Legibility predictability of robot motion, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 2013, pp. 301-308.
  22. C. Lichtenthaler, A. Kirsch, Legibility of Robot Behavior: A Literature Review, 2016.