기술혁신학회지 (Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society)

  • 제19권2호
  • /
  • Pages.280-301
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1598-2912(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-8666(eISSN)
한국기술혁신학회 (Korea Technology Innovation Society)
권호 표지

글로벌 자동차 기업의 특허포트폴리오에 관한 실증연구

An Empirical Analysis on the Patent Portfolio for Global Automotive Companies

  • 박은영 (주식회사 윕스 전략기획실) ;
  • 윤혜선 (주식회사 부영기업) ;
  • 김태영 (삼성전기 선행개발그룹) ;
  • 오동률 (성균관대학교 휴먼ICT융합학과) ;
  • 조근태 (성균관대학교 시스템경영공학과/기술경영전문대학원)
  • 투고 : 2016.02.02
  • 심사 : 2016.04.09
  • 발행 : 2016.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

기업들의 경쟁 환경이 세계시장으로 급속히 확대되고 있다. 이에 글로벌 자동차 기업을 대상으로 한 실증분석을 통해, 기업들의 국제적인 기술수준을 비교할 수 있는 특허포트폴리오 분석 방법을 제시하고자 하였다. 1991년부터 2010년까지 20년간의 삼극특허를 이용하여 국제적 수준의 특허활동을 측정하였으며, 권리적, 기술적, 경제적 측면에서 특허품질을 측정하였다. 그 결과, 미국의 자동차기업인 Ford와 GM은 특허품질이 우수하고, 특허품질의 변화도 크게 증가한 잠재적 리더로 분석되었다. 본 연구는 삼극특허를 기준으로 국적이 다른 글로벌 기업들 간의 국제적인 특허활동을 측정하고, 권리적, 기술적, 경제적 측면에서의 종합적인 특허품질을 삼극특허에 기반하여 일관성 있게 분석하는 방법을 제시한 점에서 연구의 의의가 있다.

The competition environment among companies is rapidly expanding into the world market. Therefore, this study intended to suggest an analysis method of patent portfolio that can compare an international technological capacity through empirical analysis on the global automobile companies. This study measured international patent activity using triadic patent data of 20 years from 1991 to 2010, and measured patent quality from legal, technological and economic aspects. As a result, Ford and GM, automobile companies of America, are analyzed to be the potential leaders with greatly increased patent quality. The significance of this study is in measuring international patent activities between global companies from different countries based on the triadic patent. And, this study suggested methods of analyzing patent quality consistently from legal, technological and economic aspects based on the triadic patent.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 박현우.김기일 (2007), "특허정보를 통한 PMP 연구동향과 기술경쟁력 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 7(9): 117-126.
  2. 조용래.김의석 (2014), "특허 네트워크와 전략지표 분석을 통한 기업 기술융합 전략 연구", 지식재산연구, 9(4): 198-221.
  3. 최강화.김수욱.박지영 (2008), "글로벌 자동차 기업의 품질 경쟁력에 대한 연구 : DEA 접근", 한국경영학회 2008년도 통합학술대회 발표논문집, 1-6.
  4. 한국과학기술기획평가원 (2012), "우리나라와 주요국의 특허 성과 현황 분석", KISTEP 통계 브리프.
  5. Albert, M. B., Avery, D., Narin, F. and McAllister, P. (1991), "Direct Validation of Citation Counts as Indicators of Industrially Important Patents", Research Policy, 20(3): 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(91)90055-U
  6. Chen, Y. S. and Chang, K. C. (2010), "The Relationship Between a Firm's Patent Quality and Its Market Value - The Case of US Pharmaceutical Industry", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(1): 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.06.003
  7. Dernis, H. and Khan, M. (2004), Triadic Patent Families Methodology, OECD.
  8. Ernst, H. (1998), "Patent Portfolios for Strategic R&D Planning", Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15(4): 279-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(98)00018-6
  9. Ernst, H. (2001), "Patent Application and Subsequent Changes of Performance: Evidence from Time-series Cross-section Analysis on the Firm Level", Research Policy, 30(1): 147-157.
  10. Ernst, H. (2003), "Patent Information for Strategic Technology Management", World Patent Information, 25(3): 233-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0172-2190(03)00077-2
  11. Ernst, H. and Soll, J. H. (2003), "An Integrated Portfolio Approach to Support Marketoriented R&D Planning", International Journal of Technology Management, 26(5-6): 540-560. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2003.003422
  12. Fabry, B., Ernst. H., Langholz, J. and Koster, M. (2006), "Patent Portfolios Analysis as a Useful Tool for Identifying R&D and Business Opportunities - An Emprical Application in the Nutrition and Health Industry", World Patent Information, 28(3): 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2005.10.004
  13. Griliches, Z. (1990), "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey", Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4): 1661-1707.
  14. Gudrun, L. and Michael, K. (2009), "SME Tailor-designed Patent Portfolio Analysis", World Patent Information, 31(4): 273-277 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2008.12.003
  15. Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M. and Vopel, K. (2003), "Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights", Research Policy, 32(8): 1343-1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5
  16. Lanjouw, J. O., Pakes, A., and Putnam, J. (1998), "How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Applications Data", Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(4): 405-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00081
  17. Liu, Y., Hseuh, P., Lawrence, R., Meliksetian, S., Perlich, C. and Veen, A. (2011), "Latent Graphical Models for Quantifying and Predicting Patent Quality", KDD'11 Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 1145-1153.
  18. Malackowski, J. E. and Barney, J. A. (2008), What Is Patent Quality? A Merchant Banc's Perspective, Les Nouvelles.
  19. Mansfield, E. (1986), "Patents and Innovations: an Empirical Study", Management of Science, 32(2): 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.2.173
  20. Narin, F., Noma, E. and Perry, R. (1987), "Patents as Indicators of Corporate Technological Strength", Research Policy, 16(2-4): 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(87)90028-X
  21. OECD (2008), Compendium of Patent Statistics.
  22. OECD (2013), Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard.
  23. Putnam, J. (1996), "The Value of International Patent Rights", Yale University Press, Connecticut, NJ.
  24. Schankerman, M. (1991), "Measurement of the Value of Patent Rights and Inventive Output Using Patent Renewal Data", STI Review, 8: 101-122.
  25. Squicciarini, M. (2012), Measuring Patent Quality and Radicalness: New Indicators, OECD.
  26. Squicciarini, M., Dernis, H. and Criscuolo, C. (2013), Measuring Patent Quality: Indicators of Technological and Economic Value, OECD.
  27. Wagner, R. P. (2009), "Understanding Patent Quality Mechanisms", University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157: 2136-2173.