The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of micro CT and cross-section technique for evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate crowns

전부 도재관의 변연 및 내면 간극에 대한 micro CT와 절단 시편 측정법의 비교

  • Ko, In-Seok (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Jeong-Mi (Dental Laboratory, Wonkwang University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Cho, Hye-Won (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Wonkwang University)
  • 고인석 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김정미 (원광대학교 치과병원 중앙기공실) ;
  • 조혜원 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2016.05.03
  • Accepted : 2016.06.20
  • Published : 2016.07.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adaptation of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by CAD-CAM (computer aided design-computer aided manufacturing) and heat-press technique to compare two different measurement methods in assessing fit of the ceramic crowns: micro CT and cross-section technique. Materials and methods: A prepared typodont mandibular molar for ceramic crown was duplicated and ten dies were produced by milling the PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate) resin. Ten vinyl polysiloxane impressions were made and stone casts were produced. Five dies were used for IPS e.max Press crowns with heat-press technique. The other five dies were used for IPS e.max CAD crowns with CAD-CAM technique. Ten lithium disilicate crowns were cemented on the resin dies using zinc phosphate cement with finger pressure. The marginal and internal fits in central buccolingual plane were evaluated using a micro CT. Then the specimens were embedded and cross-sectioned and the marginal and internal fits were measured using scanning electronic microscope. The two measurement methods and two manufacturing methods were compared using Mann-Whitney U test (SPSS 22.0). Results: The marginal and internal fit values using micro CT and cross-section technique were similar, showing no significant differences. There were no significant differences in adaptation between lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD-CAM and heat-press technique. Conclusion: Both micro CT and cross-section technique were acceptable methods in the evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate crown. There was no difference in adaptation between lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD-CAM and heat-press technique except occlusal fit.

목적: 본 연구는 수복물의 적합도를 계측하는 두 가지 측정방법을 평가하기 위해 CAD-CAM (computer aided design-computer aided manufacturing)과 열가압 소성법으로 전부 도재관을 제작하고 micro CT와 cross-section technique으로 전부 도재관의 적합도를 비교하고자 하였다. 재료 및 방법: 하악 제 1대구치 레진 치아를 전부 도재관을 위한 지대치를 형성하고 PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate) 레진 블록을 가공하여 10개의 시편을 복제하였다. 복제한 레진 다이의 인상을 채득하고 모형을 제작하여 5개는 열가압 소성법으로 IPS e.max Press (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) 도재관을 제작하였다. 다른 5개의 시편은 CAD-CAM 가공법(Ceramil motion 2, Amann Girrbach, Koblach, Austria)을 이용하여 IPS e.max CAD 도재관을 제작하였다. 각 레진 다이에 전부 도재관을 인산아연 시멘트(Fleck's zinc cement, Keystone industries, Gibbstown, NJ, USA)로 손가락 압력에 의해 합착하였다. 변연 및 내면 적합도를 측정하기 위해서 합착된 시편 10개를 먼저 micro CT로 촬영하여 협-설 시상면의 영상정보를 획득하였다. 그 후 절단 시편을 만들어 주사전자현미경으로 micro CT와 동일한 지점의 간극을 측정하였다. SPSS 22.0 프로그램을 이용하여 각 측정 지점에서 제작 방식별, 측정 방식별로 Mann-Whitney 검정 방법을 통해 유의차 검증을 시행하였다. 결과: Micro CT와 주사전자현미경으로 측정한 변연 및 내면 적합도는 유사하였으며, 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 두 가지 제작법의 도재관은 변연 및 내면 적합도에 유의한 차이가 없었다. 결론: CAD-CAM과 열가압소성으로 제작한 전부 도재관은 적합도에 차이를 보이고 있지 않으며, Micro CT와 주사전자현미경을 이용한 측정 방식 모두 임상적으로 이용 가능할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:4-9.
  2. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:10-5.
  3. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:389-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60124-3
  4. Seghi RR, Daher T, Caputo A. Relative flexural strength of dental restorative ceramics. Dent Mater 1990;6:181-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(90)90026-B
  5. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:478-84.
  6. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009;28:44-56. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.44
  7. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of allceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113:174-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00197.x
  8. Contrepois M, Soenen A, Bartala M, Laviole O. Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:447-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.003
  9. Moon BH, Yang JH, Lee SH, Chung HY. A study on the marginal fit of all-ceramic crown using CCD camera. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998;36:273-92.
  10. Groten M, Girthofer S, Probster L. Marginal fit consistency of copy-milled all-ceramic crowns during fabrication by light and scanning electron microscopic analysis in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:871-81. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00592.x
  11. Rahme HY, Tehini GE, Adib SM, Ardo AS, Rifai KT. In vitro evaluation of the "replica technique" in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:25-32.
  12. Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, Kern M. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:587-92.
  13. Pelekanos S, Koumanou M, Koutayas SO, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Micro-CT evaluation of the marginal fit of different In-Ceram alumina copings. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4:278-92.
  14. Neves FD, Prado CJ, Prudente MS, Carneiro TA, Zancope K, Davi LR, Mendonca G, Cooper LF, Soares CJ. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1134-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.028
  15. Gardner FM. Margins of complete crowns-literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:396-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90072-5
  16. Council on Dental Materials and Devices. Revised American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association Specification No. 8 for zinc phosphate cement. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;96:121-3. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1978.0032
  17. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  18. Gulker I. Margins. N Y State Dent J 1985;51:213-5, 217.
  19. Moldovan O, Rudolph H, Quaas S, Bornemann G, Luthardt RG. Internal and external fit of CAM-made zirconia bridge frameworksa pilot study. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 2006;61:38-42.
  20. Kydd WL, Nicholls JI, Harrington G, Freeman M. Marginal leakage of cast gold crowns luted with zinc phosphate cement: an in vivo study. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:9-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90411-4
  21. White SN, Kipnis V. Effect of adhesive luting agents on the marginal seating of cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:28-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90235-G
  22. Davis DR. Comparison of fit of two types of all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:12-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90098-4
  23. Abbate MF, Tjan AH, Fox WM. Comparison of the marginal fit of various ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:527-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90270-9
  24. Pimenta MA, Frasca LC, Lopes R, Rivaldo E. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic and metallic crown copings using x-ray microtomography (micro-CT) technology. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:223-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.002
  25. Keshvad A, Hooshmand T, Asefzadeh F, Khalilinejad F, Alihemmati M, Van Noort R. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques. J Prosthodont 2011;20:535-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00745.x
  26. Mormann WH, Schug J. Grinding precision and accuracy of fit of CEREC 2 CAD-CIM inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:47-53. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0025
  27. Mously HA, Finkelman M, Zandparsa R, Hirayama H. Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:249-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.017
  28. Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for allceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:557-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.015
  29. Rungruanganunt P, Kelly JR, Adams DJ. Two imaging techniques for 3D quantification of pre-cementation space for CAD/CAM crowns. J Dent 2010;38:995-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.08.015
  30. Krasanaki ME, Pelekanos S, Andreiotelli M, Koutayas SO, Eliades G. X-ray microtomographic evaluation of the influence of two preparation types on marginal fit of CAD/CAM alumina copings: a pilot study. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:170-2.

Cited by

  1. Marginal and internal fit of all ceramic crown using the replica technique and the triple-scan protocol vol.55, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2017.55.4.372
  2. 지르코니아 블록과 CAM 종류에 따른 코핑의 변연적합도와 기계적 특성 비교 vol.39, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2017.39.2.75